Jump to content
Midwest

Rhode Island: Draconian Gun Control Legislation Proposed

Recommended Posts

Rhode Island: Draconian Gun Control Legislation Proposed

 

 

http://libertycrier.com/lawmakers-rhode-island-unleash-long-list-anti-gun-bills/?utm_source=The+Liberty+Crier&utm_campaign=0a80e78178-The_Liberty_Crier_Daily_News_3_3_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_600843dec4-0a80e78178-285044409

 

A number of bills includes ending shall issue carry, assault weapons ban patterned after NY state's SAFE ACT, magazine limits and would affect .22 caliber rifles, 10% tax on ammunition with money possibly going to the Brady Bunch (no this isn't April 1st).

 

"

These bills are nearly identical bills to those that stalled in the state Legislature last year, however, anti-gun lawmakers relentlessly continue to focus on law-abiding citizens rather than target criminals.  As a result, cities like Providence continue to suffer under the scourge of crime.

No committee hearings have been scheduled, but these bills have been assigned to the Judiciary Committees in their respective chambers.........."

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rhode Island is not really a shall issue state. It is a hybrid shall issue/may issue, It depends who issues the permit from what I can gather...

 

 

http://www.usacarry.com/rhode_island_concealed_carry_permit_information.html

 

  • Shall Issue for Attorney General
  • May Issue for Local Authorities
  • Permits Issued to Residents or to individuals who own a resident or business in RI
  • 21 years of age required
  • Valid for 4 yeras
  • $40 for New and Renewals
  • 90 Day Processing Time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Rhode Island is not really a shall issue state. It is a hybrid shall issue/may issue, It depends who issues the permit from what I can gather...

 

 

http://www.usacarry.com/rhode_island_concealed_carry_permit_information.html

 

  • Shall Issue for Attorney General
  • May Issue for Local Authorities
  • Permits Issued to Residents or to individuals who own a resident or business in RI
  • 21 years of age required
  • Valid for 4 yeras
  • $40 for New and Renewals
  • 90 Day Processing Time

 

 

 

Interestingly enough it works the other way around. You are more likely to get a permit from a local authority than the RI AG. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is obvious that they are trying to create an anti gun area in the entire North East

 

it looks that way

 

 

They were trying to get that Universal Back Ground passed in New Hampshire and I believe it was shot down (pun intended). Even Gabby and her "UBC tour" couldn't persuade them.

 

Maine could go constitutional carry or...it might get worse for conceal carry there according to the OP.

 

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?p=9389166

 

"We once again have a chance at getting Constitutional conceal carry in Maine. That's the good news..

 

The BAD news is that if we don't get it, our whole process of conceal carry will change dramatically for the worse.

 

Basically, MAJORITY report on LD-222 would eliminate the town's ability to grant conceal carry, instead going through the all might state in one centralized database (bad)."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In a country where decisions are dictated by logic and experience instead of teeny-girly-like emotion, you'd think this sort of legislation would be laughed out of committee. Gun crime has fallen 45-50% since Florida took the bold first step in 1987 to allow concealed carry. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Im not sure, but  if the Brady campaign isnt affiliated with the gov. can they take tax money and give it to them . 

 

SEIU, Acorn (in the current presentation), and other Union and "Public Interest" entities will be spending billions of federal dollars on the 2016 election. They will spend more federal tax dollars than any total spending on any campaign to date.

 

Yes, they can tax money and give it to them. They can tax money and give it to whomever they want to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My ancestors settled Rhode Island and Providence Plantations in the early 1630s.   They would be appalled at this BS - shame on you, Rhode Island.

 

 

Silence

I find it interesting that gun homicides are at the lowest point since 1964, despite record gun sales in the past 5 years. Why do they push this even though gun violence has been dropping steadily the past 20 years, despite there being more gun owners.

 

I think we all know why.....and it ain't about safety.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By oldguysrule649
      Given the very challenging times we are experiencing especially here in NJ, I am taking the liberty of reposting something here that I had posted in the 1st Amendment section three years ago.  The broader membership, including the many new forum members that have joined since that time, might benefit from reading it.  It as relevant today, if not even more,  than it was then.  In the many recent threads on the new laws just passed, there is lots of discussion about what the government can or cannot due, might or might not due, or could do if they had the will, etc.   I feel it is important to be reminded of history and what ACTUALLY HAPPENED as a point of fact.   As has often been said, if we ignore history we are destined to repeat it.   My post was as follows:
      Recently finished reading “Gun Control in the Third Reich-Disarming the Jews and Enemies of the State” by Stephen P. Halbrook.  
      I strongly urge anyone who values our freedoms to read it.  Despite the title, it actually covers the period from the birth of the Weimar Republic in 1918 thru the Nazi regime in 1938 and the “Night of Broken Glass”.  
       For me, what is most striking about this book are the parallels between what took place then, and the gun rights challenges we face in the present times.  
       To name a few examples taken directly from various sections of the book:
      • Vague firearms laws that were harshly enforced 
      • Decree(s) requiring the surrender of all firearms and ammunition else punishment of X years in prison 
      • During the timeline covered by  the book;  possession of a firearm or ammunition was also punishable by being arrested, shot on the spot, or being sent to concentration camps.
      • Entire populations being designated as “undesirable” or “unreliable” and banned from possession of firearms. This included not only the Jews but also anyone labeled, for example, as a gypsy or a communist.
      • Forced Registration.   Before Hitler came to power, the government assured that these records would be protected and remain private.  Guess what.  Subsequently the Nazi’s later took control of these records and used them to further confiscate and persecute gun owners.
      • Mass confiscations
      • Needing to convince the local authorities of your need for a firearm and obtain their approval (sound familiar?)
      • Manufacture and importation of arms severely limited.
      • Preventing sporting clubs from providing instruction or training to their members.  Later,  such clubs and associations  were banned and/or  taken over by the government.
      • Massive police raids, house to house searches, and confiscation of “military” weapons from civilians.
      • Need for a license to acquire a firearm or ammunition whether the transaction is commercial or private.
      • Trade in firearms prohibited at annual fairs, shooting competitions,and other events.
      • Government officials and police exempted from most of these onerous laws.
       And so on. 
      As has often been said; “History Repeats Itself”.    This is more than reason enough for us to remain ever vigilant to protect our 2nd Amendment Rights.
       
       
    • By NJGF
      I have linked to an excellent article that outlines the "gun control debate".
      It should provide lots of good information that can be used when discussing gun control.
       
      Understanding the gun debate, part 1
      By Massad Ayoob
      http://www.backwoodshome.com/understanding-the-gun-debate-part-1/
    • By 9X19
      http://newjersey.news12.com/news/orlando-shooting-sparks-new-debate-on-gun-control-and-ownership-1.11916595
      Just voted no for more restrictions.
    • By HBecwithFn7
      There is now a White House Petition activated to stop the above bill (HR 4269) - The Assault Weapons ban of 2015/2016. 
       
      It needs 100,000 signatures by 01/16/2016. It has only 5557 as of this writing. Passing it along so all can sign. Please pass this onto other 2A forums.
       
      White House Petition - Stop the Assault Weapons Ban of 2015...
    • By Midwest
      Puerto Ricans can now carry firearms without a permit and the firearms registry has been eliminated.  And there are no more licensing requirements to purchase. From what the article says, it looks just regular Federal Law takes precedence. This has all the makings of a landmark victory.
       
      I posted this here because it is current gun law and perhaps it might have bearing (or influence) on New Jersey in some way in the future. The politicians in NJ can't keep all these outdated and draconian gun laws in place and keep denying the right to carry without it legally coming back and biting them in the ass sometime in the future (in my opinion). Congratulations to our friends in Puerto Rico.
       
      http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/saf-lauds-puerto-rico-court-victory-for-gun-rights-300102214.html
       
       
       
      "A surprising victory for gun rights in Puerto Rico has eliminated the firearms registry and licensing requirements to purchase and carry in the Commonwealth, the Second Amendment Foundation has confirmed.

      As of now, according to Sandra Barreras with Ladies of the Second Amendment (LSA), the group that brought the lawsuit, "there is no regulation to purchase or carry (and) all purchases will be handled in accordance with federal firearms regulations." LSA is affiliated with SAF through the International Association for the Protection of Civilian Arms Rights (IAPCAR)."
       
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...