Remington Woodsmaster 750 in .243

[JackOTrades 0]

Newbie, first post.  Anyone have thoughts/input on the Remington 750, specifically in .243?  Googling results in a lot of negative comments including; unreliability and even barrels wearing out.  But do these comments apply to the 750 or more to the previous models?  I might be interested in purchasing one (cash or through trade) but wanted to pick some brains first.  Thanks.

[Gunnz 49]

I have a 7400 in .270 and never had any problem with reliability. Only issue is seating the mags (when they are full), It is hard to get them to lock in.

But, haven't even shot the rifle in 10 years, so my memories could be incorrect.

Otherwise, it's a great looking rifle.

[JackOTrades 0]

Were the mags original or aftermarket?  Hmmmm, concerning, heck it looks like Remington discontinued the entire Woodsmaster lineup, the 750 being the last - were the issues too much to overcome for both Remington and buyers?

[Gunnz 49]

Stock mag that came with the rifle. It went in fine if you would put a little effort into it.

But at 5am in the woods when your trying to be as silent as possible there were times when I wasn't sure if it was seated properly.

Did take down a few deer with it. Not sure of the 243, but the 270 is my favorite hunting round.

[JackOTrades 0]

Age is making me head to .243 direction.  Joints have started to hurt, particularly the shoulders not to mention the eyesight isn't what it used to be.  .243 is supposed to be a good caliber anyway, as long as you aren't elephant hunting.  I guess nobody has a 750 in .243.  NJGF's marketplace doesn't have ANY items.

[Gunnz 49]

Not a lot of hunting rifles come through the market class here, I think there is another great site: newjerseyhunter ?

[JackOTrades 0]

Thanks - will check it out.