Jump to content
Raven

Welding muzzle, best option ?

Recommended Posts

In the eyes of the ATF, if properly installed, it is no longer a threaded barrel. That is not the goal of NJ law. Does the stock still have all its parts to collapse? Indeed the muzzle device and the stock are related. They are both related to compliance. And to be compliant they need to be "permanently" altered/attached. To accept the method of permanently altered/attached for one and not the other is illogical. The state makes no reference in statute to the atf guideline. It makes little sense to follow a guideline that has nothing to do with permanently attaching one part to another. Again the ATF rules are to make 2 parts into one part. And truth be told half the pin and weld jobs done in NJ do NOT pass the atf definition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the eyes of the ATF, if properly installed, it is no longer a threaded barrel. That is not the goal of NJ law. Does the stock still have all its parts to collapse? Indeed the muzzle device and the stock are related. They are both related to compliance. And to be compliant they need to be "permanently" altered/attached. To accept the method of permanently altered/attached for one and not the other is illogical. The state makes no reference in statute to the atf guideline. It makes little sense to follow a guideline that has nothing to do with permanently attaching one part to another. Again the ATF rules are to make 2 parts into one part. And truth be told half the pin and weld jobs done in NJ do NOT pass the atf definition.

 

 

 

stocks can be pinned.. mags can't.. so kind of unsure.. LOL 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now the mags did have an extra stipulation placed upon them. But as we all agree clear as mud in NJ! I cant actually find the original statement that said they had to be permanently altered in a way the mag is destroyed if an attempt to reverse it was made.

 

 

its not actually part of any written law AFAIK.. its in a letter that speaks to the intention of the law... 

 

and the clear as mud statement was kind of my point all along.. not clear.. so err on the side of caution.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are relying on the ATF Standard for permanently attaching muzzle devices, then let's compare apples to apples. In other words, do what the manufacturers did for 16"+ barrels during the Federal Ban from 1994 til 2004, and still do today for restricted States. Some pin, some pin/weld.

 

Sent from an undisclosed location

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...