Jump to content
Shawnmoore81

Assault weapons not protected

Recommended Posts

It'll be banned before it hits the shelves as long as democrats are in charged

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't forget the NJ.com article about the sun being charged as a weapon dealer.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This would be the equivalent of defining the 2A to only apply to muskets.

 

According to this ruling it doesn't apply to muskets because they were used by the military.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an interesting take on the judges duking it out in-house, this is a copy/paste from a post on the Beretta forum:

 

What's really going on is one part pissing match and one part predetermined result.

The district court originally ruled in favor of the state.

On appeal, in front of the usual three judge panel, Maryland's AWB was struck down, as it should have been, under a strict scrutiny standard of review. The 2-1 vote saw Judge King, the author of yesterday's nonsense, as the lone dissenter in the three judge panel. In his original dissent, he went on at length moaning about mass shootings. The majority opinion was written by Judge Traxell, who wound up leading the four vote dissent yesterday.

So, King gets clowned at the three judge panel level. He calls for an en banc review by all 14 judges of that appellate circuit because it only takes one.

He has to get his moonbat opinion to stick, so he made up a test explicitly rejected in Heller, and totally at odds with Miller, and using the wrong standard of review. No problem, there are nine other Clinton/Obama gun grabbers on the panel. Presto changeo, a 10-4 gun grabber decision.

Unfortunately, unless Gorsuch gets confirmed, and ideally Kennedy retires this summer so Trump gets a second 2A supporter onboard, the 4th circuit asshattery is going to stand because Roberts and Kennedy are 2A squishes and the four libs on the court are hardcore antis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/02/john-boch/proposed-executive-order-designating-rifles-militia-purposes/

 

So the national attention this is getting may generate an EO to protect ARs, perhaps even un-neutering NJ rifles until more permanent changes can be made.

We need a functional, constitutional Supreme Court.

Sooner vs later.

 

We were not a fan of EOs last yr, they shouldn't be our crutch this yr.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, EO's do not carry the power of law. 

Passing the bills we need through congress and getting as many conservative judges appointed to Districts, Appellate and the Supreme Court should be our focus.

This will ensure our legacy for the next 15-20 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...