Made in America
Sign in to follow this
Followers
0
Forum for discussion and sharing of American made goods and provided services
31 topics in this forum
-
- 4 replies
- 179 views
-
-
- 41 replies
- 6,305 views
-
- 2 replies
- 5,046 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2,180 views
-
- 11 replies
- 3,870 views
-
- 3 replies
- 3,264 views
-
- 9 replies
- 3,485 views
-
- 16 replies
- 6,575 views
-
- 10 replies
- 6,769 views
-
- 8 replies
- 13,004 views
-
- 10 replies
- 5,942 views
-
- 12 replies
- 23,965 views
-
- 0 replies
- 9,560 views
-
- 26 replies
- 6,300 views
-
- 11 replies
- 7,422 views
-
- 5 replies
- 14,179 views
-
- 1 reply
- 7,794 views
-
- 0 replies
- 6,413 views
-
- 24 replies
- 24,746 views
-
- 7 replies
- 18,911 views
-
- 27 replies
- 9,885 views
-
- 1 reply
- 6,150 views
-
- 15 replies
- 7,134 views
-
- 0 replies
- 5,186 views
-
- 1 reply
- 5,408 views
Sign in to follow this
Followers
0
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Topics
-
-
-
Supporting Vendors
-
-
Posts
-
Yes I understand that & will obviously abide by it. I am not stupid. I mentioned with the lawsuits going around there was a stipulation that as long as your qualified to carry you shouldn’t be restricted to 1 gun. I will let everything play out & see what happens down the road. It seems each county is making up their own rules which is unconstitutional as per 2nd amendment. im not even going to ask about qualifying with another gun and having it put on my permit yet. They have an attitude when you speak with them. They act like they’re doing you a favor. I have a Glock 26 which is great. It’s just the point I brought up about the restriction placed on my permit when an adjoining county gives no restrictions. It’s all good!!! -
By Cheflife15 · Posted
Unfortunately, Lots of things are unconstitutional. With that said, respectfully, I'm happier knowing a guy who can't hit a target more than a couple feet away isn't blasting away next to my wife and kid. Part of being a responsible gun owner is knowing how to handle the gun you carry. There is nothing keeping you from shooting the current gun you have with better profiency. Dry fire, take a class, practice. That should be your focus. -
By Frank Thomas · Posted
Under Bruen, the US Supreme Court ruled any gun law has to be ". . . consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation." Being an expert shooter with a tiny handgun or requiring liability insurance or banning carry in your car or at the public park, all may have some benefit, but all have no "historical tradition." So unless the Supreme Court reads " high level of proficiency," in the 2nd Amendment, it's really unconstitutional to require such a test, imho. It's a good idea to shoot accurately. But it's not Constitutional and will be rejected by the US Supreme Court at some point, imho -
By Malice4you · Posted
Seeing how they want you to provide proof your gun is yours for a NJ carry permit, there's one. And I just read about one of the other dumbass states, I believe Illinois or Cali, recently tried to pass some BS requiring proof of ownership (prior to enactment of said BS) within 4 days, or they could sieze and/or destroy the gun(s). I don't recall specifics, but found the link somewhere on this forum. -
Plenty of people think the government shouldn't be requiring it. However, you won't find many arguing against having, and maintaining, a high level of proficiency with the weapon you'll be carrying.
-
-
