NJ Prepared
NJ Prepared is a new section dedicated to those who are interested in practical prepping - UNRELATED TO FIREARMS . We are not looking for political discussions or tin foil hat conspiracy's. This is a place to share what knowledge you have and exchange information with fellow members who wish to learn what it takes to get through a disaster. Whether natural or man made. Gear reviews, Food Storage, First Aid etc... This section will hopefully help teach us the skills and knowledge needed to keep yourself and your family safe during times of distress in the state or country.
206 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 2,104 views
-
- 3 replies
- 2,174 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2,169 views
-
- 10 replies
- 3,781 views
-
- 9 replies
- 3,225 views
-
- 9 replies
- 3,881 views
-
- 25 replies
- 4,423 views
-
- 22 replies
- 3,561 views
-
- 15 replies
- 3,681 views
-
- 1 reply
- 2,655 views
-
- 4 replies
- 2,699 views
-
- 2 replies
- 2,571 views
-
- 40 replies
- 5,671 views
-
- 5 replies
- 2,218 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1,644 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1,803 views
-
- 16 replies
- 3,783 views
-
- 107 replies
- 9,007 views
-
- 8 replies
- 2,607 views
-
- 12 replies
- 3,005 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2,187 views
-
- 6 replies
- 3,088 views
-
- 26 replies
- 5,407 views
-
- 14 replies
- 2,938 views
-
- 19 replies
- 4,469 views
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Topics
-
-
-
Supporting Vendors
-
Posts
-
-
-
-
By Grima Squeakersen · Posted
Have you done any research into the cost and licensing requirements to run a repeater? We own some mountainous acreage in a very rural part of Virginia RIdge and Valley country that serves as vacation place and potential SHTF retreat. We get mediocre cell phone coverage (US Cellular only) and nothing else. I have thought of putting an antenna tower up the hill a ways (we own nearly to the top of the ridge. I wouldn't do it just for Ham or GMRS radio, but if I could get expanded cell coverage, and/or satellite internet (Dish or Starlink) as well, from one tower, I might go for it. ==== sorry, didn't intend to hijack the thread ==== -
By Grima Squeakersen · Posted
The biggest problem with this announcement is that the FBI has proven itself to be completely untrustworthy, but it is the agency charged with keeping the public informed about such developments. So, this is something that Wray and the FBI want us to believe, because they are convinced that is in their best interests that we do so. But how much objective truth is there to it? Are Biden's enviro-Nazi puppeteers planning to sabotage the internet and what is left of our petrochemical production capability and somehow false flag attribute that attack to the Chinese? Unlikely, but it's terrible and damning that I even need to seriously consider that possibility. It's a dilemma. Reminds me of an old Star Trek TV episode where Kirk short-circuits some robotic adversary by telling it, "I always lie. Listen very carefully. I am lying to you..." Personally, I'll wait until I see some corroboration of this from something that I regard as a trusted source (and those are few and far between these days) before I buy it.
-
-
