AR Discussion
All your AR specific questions here.
2,474 topics in this forum
-
- 129 replies
- 36,967 views
-
- 17 replies
- 27,800 views
-
- 20 replies
- 22,084 views
-
- 50 replies
- 13,696 views
-
- 14 replies
- 8,937 views
-
- 2,967 replies
- 469,795 views
-
- 27 replies
- 84,867 views
-
- 71 replies
- 49,344 views
-
- 12 replies
- 45,171 views
-
- 30 replies
- 36,371 views
-
- 81 replies
- 34,969 views
-
- 19 replies
- 29,511 views
-
- 40 replies
- 25,337 views
-
- 214 replies
- 23,406 views
-
- 27 replies
- 22,071 views
-
- 306 replies
- 20,683 views
-
- 33 replies
- 20,365 views
-
- 32 replies
- 20,026 views
-
- 21 replies
- 19,752 views
-
- 24 replies
- 18,692 views
-
- 77 replies
- 18,401 views
-
- 24 replies
- 18,384 views
-
- 22 replies
- 18,211 views
-
- 19 replies
- 18,178 views
-
- 321 replies
- 17,590 views
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Topics
-
-
-
Supporting Vendors
-
-
Posts
-
-
-
-
By Grima Squeakersen · Posted
Have you done any research into the cost and licensing requirements to run a repeater? We own some mountainous acreage in a very rural part of Virginia RIdge and Valley country that serves as vacation place and potential SHTF retreat. We get mediocre cell phone coverage (US Cellular only) and nothing else. I have thought of putting an antenna tower up the hill a ways (we own nearly to the top of the ridge. I wouldn't do it just for Ham or GMRS radio, but if I could get expanded cell coverage, and/or satellite internet (Dish or Starlink) as well, from one tower, I might go for it. ==== sorry, didn't intend to hijack the thread ==== -
By Grima Squeakersen · Posted
The biggest problem with this announcement is that the FBI has proven itself to be completely untrustworthy, but it is the agency charged with keeping the public informed about such developments. So, this is something that Wray and the FBI want us to believe, because they are convinced that is in their best interests that we do so. But how much objective truth is there to it? Are Biden's enviro-Nazi puppeteers planning to sabotage the internet and what is left of our petrochemical production capability and somehow false flag attribute that attack to the Chinese? Unlikely, but it's terrible and damning that I even need to seriously consider that possibility. It's a dilemma. Reminds me of an old Star Trek TV episode where Kirk short-circuits some robotic adversary by telling it, "I always lie. Listen very carefully. I am lying to you..." Personally, I'll wait until I see some corroboration of this from something that I regard as a trusted source (and those are few and far between these days) before I buy it.
-
-
