Leaderboard

First I will take followed by PM. FFL transfer in bayville. You pay 50.00 transfer fee. To buyer of M1. I have a ammo can of 4 bandoliers in clips. Hard to find. This HRA garand is brand new, USGI parts and new gauging 51 barrel. From CMP with DOCS. CMP is running out of M1s. Not taking any new orders. Rifle is SPF ammo is 250.00 https://imgur.com/a/x6wuNIa

I actually just did mine last month at Hudson Farms. The whole session lasted about an hour. While I was given a gun I was unfamiliar with (Remington 1100) the proctor walked me through the operation just fine. I fired a grand total of three rounds as that's how long it took me to hit a clay. It was a very pleasant experience other than the cold wind LOL. They just want to see that you know how to safely handle the shotgun and follow instructions if/when prompted. Personally Ms. Peel I don't think you have anything to worry about it.

Durability is one factor to use concrete over wood. The concrete won’t warp or rot. But, more importantly, the concrete doesn’t move, wobble, shift, bounce or shake. This makes a much more stable platform to shoot from. This is very helpful when zeroing optics and/or shooting for accuracy. Wooden benches would move too much and impart to much instability to the shooter and rifle.

Anyone surprised that this story was dropped like a hot potato after this vile person's background was revealed?

We are all a test case.

Should have stopped and said hi. You may have been surprised who was there.... Uh oh! Fudd alert!!

No need to comply with unconstitutional executive orders. No need at all.

Yep! This is a HUGE misunderstanding today. Think of it as, "A well-regulated clock keeps the most accurate time". That definition of the word, in fact, is the reason that the most accurate type of pendulum clocks at the time came to be called "Regulators"... because they were, in fact, in good working order and thus "well-regulated". I laugh/cringe when I see people think it means "regulations" in a legal/paper-sense. I mean think about it - it doesn't even make common sense! Look at the length of the founding documents - they were incredibly short. At that time, this current level of regulatory madness wasn't even a thing. If the Founders were reincarnated today, their mouths would be agape to learn that a single bill is often hundreds of pages long, if not over 1,000 pages. That is entirely a development of modern times.

There's a theory that all the earlier rhetoric from the left about packing the court was to intimidate the conservative justices. The message is "if you follow the constitution and we don't like it, we'll just add enough justices that your vote won't ever count again".