Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/13/2021 in all areas
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
2 pointsKULAK ARMS charges $25 ...I won't use any other FFL..Rich has been great to me over the years!!
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointAs to gravel, before I paved, I dumped about 10 yards on mine over the years. 20 yards is a LOT of material. You say big driveway, how big in feet? 100 feet long 32 feet wide? 200 feet long, 16 feet wide? That is indeed a big driveway. Most truck drivers will try to spread it out as they pull away, but you tend to end up with one big pile and a few other small piles. Expect to rake a lot. You also need air clearance. No wires or trees up there. The cost is not bad for that amount of gravel, but it seems like a lot to me. As to shingles, just make sure they are good quality architectural and not 3 tab. 3 tabs tend to blow off whenever there is a hurricane that comes through. Timberline(GAF) shingles are really what you should get. Contractors in your area I can't help you with.
-
1 pointYour hand and arm will be below the ejection port so you should not be getting hit at all... unless maybe you're shooting indoors and the brass is reflecting off a divider.
-
1 pointAnother option may be to change platforms and pick up a Tavor. Being a bullpup design, there is less weight forward of your strong hand and I believe that can be configured for left hand ejection.
-
1 point
-
1 pointRemington ammo facility back online and running 24/7. Definitely will help. https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2021/4/12/big-green-is-back-remington-ammo-plant-working-247#.YHRKpqPnotc.facebook
-
1 point
-
1 pointMr. Heller is very friendly and interesting to talk to - had a short conversation with him in person at the Wash D.C. rally a couple of years ago. If you can't attend, consider just donating to the D.C. Project. They're an outstanding countering voice to the Moms Demand Action activists.
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointI think we should name the ffls and their prices. Nothing wrong with helping forum members save money.
-
1 pointEh, though I disagree with him on a few salient points... it does sound like this guy is FINALLY figuring out what many of us figured out a long time ago >>> though there are undoubtedly some well-intentioned people among the rank and file of gun control groups, the leadership of those groups absolutely don't give a DAMN about saving lives! They're all about power and control and adhering to political orthodoxy. The violence interruption programs that he cites in his op-ed DO, in fact, have proven effectiveness... because they focus on the PERSON, not the TOOL. For example, I've long promoted the programs developed by the criminologist David Kennedy which rely on community-led efforts to pull kids out of gang life. They have an excellent track record. However, by their very nature, those programs can't help but shine a bright light on the politically uncomfortable aspects of gun crime - like the wildly disparate crime rates (by demographics), the family dysfunction/absentee dads that helps spawn criminals, the abundance of "repeat offenders" and the broken justice system that puts them right back on the street to re-offend. The gun control movement (which tends to be overwhelmingly progressive in its political affiliation) doesn't want to touch those issues with a 10-foot pole. But, if they were actually concerned about saving lives, they'd be all over those issues! And ironically, they'd find themselves on common ground, I think, with many independents and conservatives.