Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/23/2023 in all areas

  1. 3 points
  2. 2 points
    They were labelled "cop killer bullets". It was recycling the same con that the politicians have been using for decades. Create a scary boogeyman that the lazy, uninformed voter will take on face value. Present yourself as the savior that will slay the boogeyman. Get voted in again. Rinse, repeat. They have done it over and over again and the dumb voters keep buying it. Covid, ebola, Trump, China, the Russians, global warming, ozone layer, acid rain, commies, gun owners, AR-15s, murder hornets, etc. You get the idea.
  3. 2 points
    I think it’s more like the laws are written by nitwits that don’t know how bullets work and someone decided HPs were scary
  4. 1 point
  5. 1 point
    3rd circuit has requested responses to NJ's emergency request for a stay: Somewhat encouraging. In the 7th circuit, they issued a stay of the PI in Illinois' AWB immediately without asking for responses. Looks like we get to continue carrying until at least 05/30...
  6. 1 point
  7. 1 point
    "They" don't want you to own guns let alone carry them.
  8. 1 point
    so they're calling all of us criminals. and they're trying the "well they did it, so you should too" argument.......
  9. 1 point
    NJ filed its appeal to the 3rd circuit last night in attempt to reverse the Preliminary Injunction: Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal: https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/6681/attachments/original/1684805839/Koons_v_Platkin_Motion_for_Stay_Pending_Appeal.pdf?1684805839 Uncontested Motion to Expedite Appeal: https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/6681/attachments/original/1684803483/Koons_v_Platkin_Motion_to_Expedite.pdf?1684803483
  10. 1 point
    I guess it is just the legal ones that are the problem.
  11. 1 point
  12. 1 point
    Is that Zelensky's garage?
  13. 1 point
  14. 1 point
    Winchester 223 Remington Ammo 55 Gr FMJ 1000 Rounds - Ammo Deals (targetsportsusa.com) $460/1000 w/free shipping from TargetSportsUSA but with their membership its $423.20 free shipping. Winchester's 20% rebate would make it $338.56 shipped or $0.338/round.
  15. 1 point
  16. 1 point
  17. 1 point
    Thank you, Anthony! I listened to it all - my notes: Still the beginning of the case. There's still a lot to fight for until we get the final ruling. NJ is appealing the PI to the 3rd circuit, but the case is still not complete. Judge Bumb still needs a factual record - additional discovery and evidentiary hearing. The court can potentially change their mind and take away places to carry (though it's not likely). We could potentally get more places allowed to carry. The judge has not expressed an opinion either way. Regarding private property - there are 2 different types of people: invitees and licensee. A licensee is someone who has explicit permission. An invitee has implied permission. For example a Burger King - nobody has to tell you that you have permission to enter. It's implied permission and considered the default rule. The state attempted to change the default rule that says if there is not explicit permission that you're not allowed. The state even tried to put in an Amicus Curaie brief arguing the that the state gets to take the decision from the actual private property owner if they're not there to grant explicit consent. Judge Bumb saw through that and struck it down as it would be a flat out ban on carry. The court made a distinction of property held open to the public. The 3 types are: Commercial property open to the public, Commerical property not open to the public, and private property. Commercial property open to the public - for example a Burger King. They can kick you out, but you cannot be charged as a trespasser just for entering the property. Commercial property not open to the public - EG a Warehouse, Office, etc - you need to have credentials to enter - a key card, etc. You still need explicit permission to enter. Residential property is not open to the public, but the court refers to the curtailage - the walkway, the driveway, the front steps, the yard... The UPS driver has to walk up to the door to deliver a package. They have no way of getting permission without going up and knocking on the door. So the same way a Burger King is open to the public, the curtailage of a property is open to the public. If you have to unlock a door, swipe a card key, etc - it's not open to the public. We got more out of the PI than the TRO. The court concluded that the injury claimed was not likely to arise in the short time frame. This is why we got more in the PI vs the TRO. Regarding Dr's offices - Schmutter disagrees with the opinion however we have plenty of time to sway the court to our position that it's a single prohibition that covers the whole thing vs getting access to only a select list of medical facilities. If you're likely to go to one of the medical facilities listed and a member of ANJRPC (or for that matter CNJFO, FPC, SAF, etc) - email [email protected] - you can provide an affadavit and can provide assistance to the case to demonstrate standing. We did not get wildlife refuge's covered in the PI as the case does not have anyone demonstrating standing that they are planning on going to one of these places and can't carry. Dan will be putting out a call and listing all of the places so that we have more support to provide standing. There is a 2 gun limit on the firearms you can carry. If there are more guns in the car - there is a distinction on what you're carrying vs not carrying. The state will be requesting appealing the PI - requesting a stay pending appeal - which would stop the PI ruling until the appeal is ruled on. If the stay is granted to the state - the law would go back into effect nullifying the PI, and all restrictions would go back into affect. Pay attention to what happens to this. Mag ban case - the 3 cases have been combined for discovery - The Mag ban case, ANJRPC's Assault Firearm case, and FPC's Assault Firearm case. The 3 cases are combined for discovery - exchanging reports, evidence, etc. The schedule has been set - Discovery wraps up and file dispositive motions by September, and will be heard by the court in October. The motions have the potential to resolve the cases in entirety. There is the possibility that the cases may be resolved in October.
  18. 1 point
  19. 1 point
    STOP drinking bud lite.
  20. 0 points


  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...