Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/25/2023 in all areas

  1. 3 points
  2. 3 points
  3. 2 points
    I'm not sure about that. As lackluster the campaign run by Ciatterelli seemed to me, I wonder what the outcome would have been if not for the "legitimate" voting process.
  4. 2 points
    Now who is going to run Bartertown?
  5. 2 points
    I suspect this guy is not a concealed carry permit holder; if he was Papa Smurphy would have had all media outlets carpet bombing the state with alarmist nonsense about the dangers posed by legal gun owners.
  6. 1 point
    IIRC, the "old" law didn't specify open vs concealed, it was simply a carry permit. I believe that has now changed with the new law and only concealed is permitted.
  7. 1 point
  8. 1 point
  9. 1 point
    Maybe somebody can come up with an option that attaches to the shoulder and not the gun. A pad with a plastic insert that directs the end of the tube. / / | | \ \ something like that. think of it round, like a funnel to direct/slide the end of the buffer tube into the center. make is rainbow colored and see if they want to make that illegal.
  10. 1 point
    NJ AG Platkin is whining: https://www.nj.com/news/2023/05/njs-appeals-ruling-that-dismantled-conceal-gun-carry-restrictions.html Non-paywalled archive.ph link: https://archive.ph/Rc24N#selection-191.1-195.224 Good.
  11. 1 point
    If anyone wants to watch 2000 Mules, I think you will find it interesting. I know I did. PM me for instructions on how to view it for free.
  12. 1 point
    Yes. That is our only recourse now. That and federal law such as national reciprocity.
  13. 1 point
    It is kinda weird that the early drop box ballots are the very last to be counted. It is very convenient for fraud.
  14. 1 point
  15. 1 point
    Sounds remarkably like the middle of the night vote drops in Atlanta and Milwaukee in '20.
  16. 1 point
    Just a quick reminder that registration is open for Phillipsburg IDPA this Sunday. Register here: https://practiscore.com/phillipsburg-idpa-may-2023-sunday/register
  17. 1 point
    didn't we all go to bed with citeralli having a rather comfortable lead, then suddenly when we woke up it had pretty much reversed? kinda fishy like?
  18. 1 point
    Of course he isn't. No one who went through that rigamarole to get his permit would whip it out for a traffic merge problem. And besides that, just look at his face. I would have denied the permit just on the basis of his photo.
  19. 1 point
  20. 1 point
    Yeah, I get it. But about 90% of NJ's population don't own guns. Our only hope is the courts, not elected officials. Don't hope that the electorate will suddenly start voting for Constitution-respecting politicians. That ship sailed long ago, if it ever even existed in this state.
  21. 1 point
    Yup. This is an important distinction. The NJ Govt may not be doing what you think is right for your interests, but like it or not - the Gov we have here is the Gov that was elected by the majority of NJ residents. They are doing the work that the “majority”of NJ residents want done. You just happen to be in the minority in this state.
  22. 1 point
  23. 1 point
    "They" have different rules. "They" don't want you to own firearms, let alone carry them.
  24. 1 point
  25. 1 point
    The thing that bothers me most about this litigation is that no-one is challenging the notion that vetted, law-abiding, permit holders are a danger to other members of the public. We are not. We carry for self defense against attacks from lawless, violent people. Some of us are also prepared to defend others from such people. Lawless, violent people are neither inclined or allowed to obtain permits. Yes, there are particularly vulnerable people who sometimes congregate in specific locations, but almost all also venture elsewhere. Why should they be deprived of protecting themselves, or being protected by others that are vetted, law-abiding permit holders just because they are in a group at a given location? NJ says there are dozens of "sensitive locations". If all these places are so sensitive, why does the State not deploy the same level of security as they do for their own legislative chambers and court houses? Clearly most of these places are not really that sensitive. This should be the test for whether a given place is really "sensitive". Is there historical precedent that the State found that it was necessary to deploy security measures to each one? One bug bear for me is the schools prohibition. I drop and pick up my kid at school daily due to the bus run going past their mother's house, not mine. There are cops guarding the school building and controlling entry to the building. There is no security for the grounds, driveway and parking areas. This is similar to the curtilage Judge Bumb called out around residential property. Why are we not allowed to carry during drop-off and pick-up? Even the Federal Gun Free Schools Act exempts carry permit holders.
  26. 1 point
    Make no mistake, the people we call leftards, the useful idiots are not the same as the ones pulling the strings.. The puppeteers are very intelligent and well educated in psychology, sociology, political science and a few other disciplines. They know how to manipulate, just like Goebbels did. Do not underestimate them. Trannies on beer cans is something nobody saw coming, and yet, here we are. That does not happen without systemic social programming.
  27. 0 points
    sounds that way. all the utubers are saying that. constructive possession........and it ain't looking like they're gonna stop this before it happens
  28. 0 points
    https://deadline.com/2023/05/tina-turner-dead-obituary-rock-soul-singer-was-83-1235378614/ Wow! She was a real powerhouse artist. Sad!


  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...