almach5
Members-
Content Count
6 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
N/A
Community Reputation
2 NeutralAbout almach5
-
Rank
Forum Dabbler
- Birthday November 30
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Home Range
RTSP Randolph
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
NJ LAWMAKERS ANNOUNCE PLANS TO DESTROY RIGHT TO CARRY
almach5 replied to M1152's topic in Pending Legislation Discussion
We are in the WRONG state. For example - this is the requirements for North Carolina. Seems more than reasonable: "In order to qualify to carry a hand gun concealed in North Carolina, you must hit a silhouette target from distances of 3, 5, and 7 yards (ten rounds each)." No firing from the knees, no 25 yards, no weak hand, nothing. What am I missing here??? -
almach5 started following NJ LAWMAKERS ANNOUNCE PLANS TO DESTROY RIGHT TO CARRY and Carry Insurance?
-
I also have an $1m umbrella policy - I expect that to suffice here in NJ.
-
NJ LAWMAKERS ANNOUNCE PLANS TO DESTROY RIGHT TO CARRY
almach5 replied to M1152's topic in Pending Legislation Discussion
Hi 124gr9mm. I just sent an email query to the Judge’s court clerk asking the above. I’ll post what the result is, once I get a response. Thanks again. -
NJ LAWMAKERS ANNOUNCE PLANS TO DESTROY RIGHT TO CARRY
almach5 replied to M1152's topic in Pending Legislation Discussion
Hey 124gr9mm, that is the way I was taking it - I received mine from the Passaic County Court back in December, limiting me to the two firearms I qualified with. In my case, I do not have to carry my court order per the Judge, but he did state that any future changes must occur at the PD level. Not sure how I would get an order nullifying my limitation at the PD level… -
NJ LAWMAKERS ANNOUNCE PLANS TO DESTROY RIGHT TO CARRY
almach5 replied to M1152's topic in Pending Legislation Discussion
Another follow up that I am trying to corroborate. A staff at Reloaderz in Wayne NJ advised that the CCW now covers any firearms that you own, whether you previously qualified with another weapon or not. I did a quick search and could not find any laws or updates referring to this change. Does anyone have the citation where I can see this (if indeed it is true)? Personally, I would only CCW a firearm I qualified with - just in case and just my personal choice. Thanks to all… -
NJ LAWMAKERS ANNOUNCE PLANS TO DESTROY RIGHT TO CARRY
almach5 replied to M1152's topic in Pending Legislation Discussion
OK, here’s a follow up question for the group. I was told by somebody whom I trust, that the TRO is selectively enforced, or not enforced, depending on the municipality. Is it really the discretion of the municipal police department whether or not they are going to follow the law as written by Mr. Murphy vs. the instructions in the TRO? For example, the ability to carry in one’s own vehicle, versus removing any ammunition and magazines, and locking a firearm in the trunk and storing the ammunition in a separate locked container. Seeking an absolute here, not conjecture, as it might mean the difference between legal CCW versus a potential arrest for brandishing.