bbk

Great options already posted, and here is another if you're interested. If you are considering a 14.5" barrel (carbine or mid-length gas systems), consider BCM. They have options on all of their 14.5" uppers where they will pin a muzzle device to make the upper a non-NFA item (if you were to put it on a lower). You would have to do your own research into the muzzle devices, but plenty of their options have been considered good to go for NJ. Pro-tip: Of the two gas-lengths, there are more options with the mid-length 14.5" uppers. I would also recommend choosing an upper without a front sight post/block since those have the bayonet lugs on them. You can forget that previous sentence if you have someone in mind that can shave the lug off for you of course. I personally have an NJ-compliant upper that I ordered directly off their site without any modifications needed. To boot, BCM is a reputable manufacturer.

Its good on Sig to address the issue, as its happening. While I'm actually starting to shift away from striker-fire pistols as a whole for my purposes (CCW), I'm with HE 100%. IMO, it shouldn't matter what you do-- the pistol is defective. And that defect is dangerous, bottom line. The only people who are making it a pissing contest are the ones wanting to. Everything else is just facts.

Indeed a great post. I've done a few long distance trips out west, notably in and through Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and Texas. While OC is not as common as I thought it would be at first, the communities and law enforcement had a much deeper understanding and appreciation for firearms. The times I would see someone walking around open carry, nobody was dropping babies and running-- or even batting an eye at that. With that said, I did see my fair share of pretty shoddy carrying techniques (mostly pistols jammed into a pocket, and either printing or looking like it was about to fall out). I even saw a gentleman who's pistol straight dropped out of their pocket onto the floor-- and didn't notice until someone else tapped him on the shoulder. Living in CA though, while I was fortunate enough to get my CCW (there's been a huge resurgence as of late with many county sheriffs issuing), I still am very much about deep concealment. I plan on some more trips this winter, and potentially a cross-country. While I carry probably 75% of the time (work has me at a lot of gov facilities and universities where I can't), I've become much more use to it. Still, I haven't winter carried yet, and while its usually cool enough to wear a light hoodie or jacket at the least year-round, I'm interested how that will change things.

Working with a few team guys, I can attest to the fact that they all advocate IDPA, and use it as a learning tool. We also have had a few competition shooters come in and give instruction. So, there is definitely merit to heavy hitters learning a thing or two from match shooters. But as many have said, intention of execution is two different stories, and is comparing apples to oranges. Shane pointed out a great point of how the operational world is starting to utilize tips that started out from match shooting, like red dots on secondary systems-- but not for the same reasons (i.e. target acquisition and speed). Red dots on pistols are being adopted in spades because of their ease of use with NVGs. In the end, its all good training-- everything else is stick measuring.

Believe it or not, CCW issuance has been trending up here in CA where I'm at currently (NorCal). I thought I was going from bad to worse coming out here, and in ways I have (I opted to not play the AR games), but I have my CCW in CA and NV, which works out as I'm constantly traveling around the two states for work and play.

Teraflops, all the rage. Early tech specs are pointing to Project Scorpio (Microsoft) being "better" than PS4 Pro, but one has to consider the licensing/exclusives and community as well. One advantage to Microsoft games now and moving forward is that if you purchase them for Xbox or PC, you get them for both. Do I need multiple copies of one game? Nah, but its cool (and the saves are cross-platform). In the end, I am a PC guy though, not because I am an elitist, but because I prefer a mouse and keyboard, and its where my friends game.

I agree with Apple's stance on the matter. If it was an algorithm software, or something more brute-force that targeted the passcode issue, I would argue otherwise. But creating a backdoor that would undermine the security for the entirety of iOS that powers all of the Apple mobile devices? That is a ridiculously powerful and scary skeleton key, especially in an age where the cyber battlefield is pretty much even across allied and foreign nations and agencies, as well as private security companies, and private citizens (all of whom are engaging in white/grey/black hat). There is an exponentially larger impact here, and as much as I want whatever information is on that phone available for authorities, there is a way to do this without jeopardizing the security of over 700 million+ devices (many of which are in use by major companies, DOD civilians, military, and other users that have access to highly sensitive information). As for Apple having any responsibility or duty to do this-- in fact, just like telecommunication companies eventually pushed back, private companies with this type of influence and power have a responsibility, just as much as any private citizen, to keep our government in check. Nothing good will come out of this if Apple caves and is forced to create this back door.

Sure, defend against those who wish to kill us-- I have no qualms about that, as I partook in that act myself as a servicemember. However, the illogical and illegitimate aspect is when Americans/Westerners demonize Islam and Muslims as a whole. THAT is my issue.

You have to be careful with transliterations of the Qur'an. There are maybe only a handful (if that) English transliterations that are actually respected. The majority of the versions you find in public bookstores aren't really accepted. And the other risk you run is taking things out of context. Like the Bible, which I've read (NIV and KJ), anything can be taken out of context and bastardized. Same reason why white-supremacy groups and WBC aren't really taken all that seriously-- why is Islam not given the same thought? Because extremists (who the overwhelming majority of Muslims will speak out against) are victimizing innocents? Reserve your hate for those who commit the act, and not the misinterpretation they do it in.

Nobody knows the actual reasons for this violence, so, conclusions now are purely speculation. To say that this is a matter of Islamic extremists is wholly useless. Reaching that conclusion is not far-fetched, sure, I can agree with that-- but to state it as a fact is wrong. And no, Islam doesn't state that people should "convert or die," or to even attack infidels. So, read the Qur'an or talk to an Imam or a scholar before misstating things.

You guys spewing about this being a religious war, first get the legitimate facts on what you are berating. Also, if you want to take the discussion there, go beyond the American perspective, and attempt to see the global aspect of things. I say these things because you guys risk sounding like idiots in a public forum.

I've been following that imgur/crowd-source since Monday... it's seemed far more provoking and informative than anything on the telly

I had the Vortex 1-4x PST for a few years, and I really, really *wanted* to like it. The Vortex was not, like many variable power scopes, a true 1x-- more like 1.1-1.3x. Was this a huge deal? No. The deal breaker for me was that it was heavy. I figured I'd sack up and just deal with it, but after a series of progressively challenging training courses-- there is just something miserable about lugging around a 10-12lb rifle. This is relevant because side-by-side, shooting the rifle with the 1-4x was just as fast and maneuverable, with both-eyes open shooting, as with an RDS. But factor in exhaustion, and the fine motor skills deteriorate much faster. As for the cheek weld and getting scope shadow, its something that can be trained past. What I did was put a small piece of red duct tape exactly where my cheek weld should be, and I practiced until I got it down. Once I did that, I theory-crafted and trained irregular positions until I was comfortable. Its preference. I don't think you could go wrong with the 1-4x, just don't underestimate how the littlest of weight gained can throw you off entirely.

Now that I've had sufficient time with my PRO, its a tough call between a PRO and T1. Like HE said, if the two were priced the same, I'd go with the T1-- but for the value, a PRO hands-down. A PRO vs. Vortex? I couldn't honestly say as I've only fired a friend's who had a Vortex. Seems well enough for range purposes; but I'm not sure how robust the Vortex is long-term. I have nothing against Vortex (owned some of their glass), I just can't judge that specific product. In a vacuum though, I'd take my PRO over most products on the market in a heartbeat.

I feel for you. I'm the same age, going through the same problem. Even with professional experience and VP, and a Bachelors, there is still difficulty in getting into certain career fields. Maybe I'm being too selective, but I would rather be a nomad then be stuck in a cubicle all day for the foreseeable future (I turned down a sales/office position recently). The way I see it, I just have to keep grinding, and the opportunities will come. What I keep reminding myself is to not get tunnel vision in the process, and always keep in mind alternative options. Having recently finished school, I'd rather not jump into my pursuits for a JD/MA as I'd rather work; but I can't dismiss the notion entirely as it would be a disservice to myself. Just keep your chin up, we'll make it through just fine as long as we keep pushing forward.

Troy Battle Sight Rear Fixed. I've run the Magpul MBUS before, and while they're not bad by any means, I prefer fixed sights (even though I run an Aimpoint). I bank on the fact that all gear, even Aimpoints, will ultimately take a huge dump at the exact they're needed-- Murphy's Law. Its light, sturdy, and I can still accomplish a 1/3 co-witness if I want. My FSB is stock.

I've attended CCS 1&2, as well as CPS 1&2, with Chris and MDTS multiple times, and the level of training, professionalism, and legitimate real-world application is incomparable. If I wasn't as busy myself, I'd be right there on the line with you-- have fun and bring a note book!

They did just that when they claimed their first "nuclear test"...

Nice, I've been curious about the Magpul handstop kit. I personally don't need one as I've got my reference down pat, but the design concept is intriguing. I am curious though, what light is attached to that switch?

Eh, speculation is speculation. Until there is confirmation of higher levels of radiation in the soil/air in the test site, the North Koreans could have just blown up another few hundred thousand pieces of dynamite for all we know. And even if they did manage to do a nuclear test, its as meaningful as their threats they made last week... about something... which I'm sure was important for some reason or another then too. One thing that the North Koreans can do quite well is rattle the sh-t out of their saber.

Ah, Shore Shots catching the back-end again. Honestly, I don't care much for their business, but I don't hold anything against them for what they did here. And, ultimately, no one on this forum (or anywhere in the world for that matter), with the exception of the couple and Shore Shots, really know the truth of the matter... so, why are we still commentating? Now, some of the comments by Shore Shots on their FB page/post are pretty stupid. The logic of attacking someone's response by dredging up past history is illogical and quite juvenile. Still, I don't really care, and, beyond literal actions, they don't register anymore on my radar as there are far more reliable and personable FFLs out there that I'd rather give my money.

Blue Forces Gear VCAS as well. I attach mine to my rifle similarly to High Exposure, with the two attachments as close to the center of balance as possible. The front QD mounts to the rear QD slot on the left-side of my Daniel Defense Omega rail. The rear QD is mounted to the right-side of my Tango Down PR-16A4 sling attachment (I have an old Sully stock on my rifle [has no QD slots]). I mount this way so that the rear attachment does not interfere with my cheek-weld, and so that when I transition strong to weak-side, or to my pistol, it just feels more natural. The way I've always learned is that there are arguably only one or two situations where a rifle should ever "hang," and is the reason why I really avoid using that term when discussing slings, or using it as a criteria to judge a sling.

I grew up and live in this town. I was actually in the area when the police and choppers came blazing to the scene. Needless to say I was a bit shocked as we're just small-town folk, and the most excitement we get is the occasional driver pulled over for speeding or making a right at a no-turn-on-red light. Word spread pretty quickly, and as soon as I heard I reached out to a LEO friend who confirmed the above (as well as my mother who was teaching at WWP-HSN). Sitting at the coffee shop in town tonight, plenty of people were talking about how it was duck hunters by the pond behind the elementary school off in the woods. The elementary, middle, and high school in Plainsboro (the other set of schools are in West Windsor-- its a joint school district) are all clustered together, with Plainsboro pond and the woods/marshes located behind the middle and elementary school. I wouldn't go as far as to say Plainsboro is a conservative town. The difference is that the farmers have had the majority of influence going back to when the town was founded, and often they can be seen going around their property with shotguns over their shoulders. My speculation is that because of their influence, Plainsboro does not have a No-Discharge law (while West Windsor does). Either way, no harm, no foul-- just a bit of nerves it seems.

I don't know about that. If accusations are true, that the former Mr. Kyle was conducting an outreach program for Vets with PTSD, and that the suspect is a Marine with PTSD-- this reflects poorly on the leadership. For the same reason why suicides across the services (notably in combat zones and those coming back from combat zones) has risen dramatically; and also for the same reasons of why PTSD is not really taken that seriously by the core leadership within said leadership and even with the VA. Remember that it was the leadership that denied wholeheartedly to award Purple Hearts for PTSD. Heck, personally, going back to when I had separated (2008), PTSD still wasn't taken that seriously. The whole unit had quarterly briefs, but there was no real standardized training for NCOs on what to look for when assessing. Maybe its a machismo thing, but PTSD is a legit issue that is still ignored as much as the case of rape within the ranks is these days. And because of that, the powers that be will probably sweep it all under the rug and blame all of this on something else (like gun violence), but not necessarily use this to target vets... because if they do that, they are essentially legitimizing the argument that gun violence has more to do with access compared to the actuality of violence that the presence of guns purport. To me, this is essentially the same argument that has been made in many cases, notably with the Newtown tragedy.

Woah, what? I possess no tinfoil hats, but Noveske and now Mr. Kyle? (Given this is true) ETA: Source: http://www.khou.com/...-189539281.html ETA2: I don't want my initial comment to be misread-- I'm not citing any kind of conspiracy, nor am I even alluding to the idea. Just that the community/industry has lost two larger-than-life individuals in such a short time. SOFREP had a short post up briefly regarding the incident, but its seemingly disappeared. The site may be experiencing some crazy traffic...