Njgunowner

http://www.assaultweapon.info/ Send this to your anti pals, might explain a few things to them in way they might even understand.

At which time they'd say, " Thanks, our super strict laws here in NJ had everything to do with the lower gun crime and if we enact more we can reduce it further!" Politicians love to spin things. As Mcbethr and others have said, these guys aren't there to be lectured on the 2nd amendment and they'll just zone out if that's what your plan is. They're interested in ideas that people will support, whether pro or anti and that's probably the best way to approach it.

It's illegal to make it a requirement to not have firearms to lease property, that's already been well established by courts and law. Second, the ones you see on TV have a warrant already. No police officer is going to enter a property without a warrant when camera's are rolling, unless it's staged.

If he had 30 round magazines as the police are saying, he broke the law. We may not like the law, but it's still the law.

The laws of this state aren't a big hidden secret and he's in trouble. However, a landlord does NOT have the right to allow police entry into your home except in an emergency. In this case, he's lost the guns. He'll never be able to retrieve them as they aren't legal for him to own being prohibited. He SHOULD however be able to have the case dropped for an illegal search and seizure.

$400-500 I think.

Saw this while cruising the web, thought I'd post it for anyone looking but not finding. http://www.jgsales.com/-p-5887.html

I got my form letter today, I feel so included

You don't have to sell anything at a loss. But if you are buying a gun with the intention of turning it around in a quick sell, you're technically pushing your luck. NO ONE, ATF included, is going to care that you bought and sold a few rifles. They aren't going to care if you made $10,000 in profit (though the Tax collectors might). You can't be SEEN as being the business of selling firearms. Lots of people buy a gun, decide they don't like it or want something else, and sell it 2 weeks later. It happens, the ATF knows it. just keep it reasonable. If the ATF finds your name in a FFL's log book 50 times, he's probably going to wonder what's going on. Most guys who get nailed, are buying and selling at gun shows. The ATF usually has an agent or two roaming these things, and if they notice the same guy keeps buying a table and shows up with new guns to sell show after show, they're probably going to start asking questions. Also if you keep showing up 3 times a week for a few months to ship out guns from your FFL, he might notify someone. Long story short, don't be too paranoid. NO ONE cares about 2 or 3 guns, heck they probably wouldn't notice 20 a year. Just don't get in the habit of buying a gun with the idea of turning it around for a quick sell. It could get habit forming

25-50 yards was referring to maximum range, not it only works if they're between 25-50

Just be glad we don't still have Corzine, we'd be hosed already.

Negative, if you are buying and then reselling guns as means of creating money/aka profit for yourself you NEED a FFL license. Probably has more to do with taxation and accountability than anything. You sell 5 guns a year, no one is going to pay attention. You sell 50, you'll probably get a visit from the ATF unless you can convince them you were just disposing of a private collection you've owned for a few years and no longer wanted. You CANNOT be in the business of selling firearms without a FFL period. If you are buying guns and reselling them to make money, you ARE in the business of selling firearms.

Sales for profit specifically refers to someone who is trying to sale firearms as a business, or even as a side business. If you are going out and buying firearms with the specific purpose of reselling them for profit you would be in violation of the law. If you are simply reselling a firearm you bought for your own use and are just taking advantage of the current price increases, that would fine.

That isn't how politicians work. If that were the case they'd drop it to protect their careers. More likely the crying from the people who WANT more restrictions is louder and those are the people they are trying to appease.

Yep, I'd have taken that deal too

I came really close to a Stag Model 3, they're nice rifles.

Not a reloader... yet. I've considered it, but not a high priority right now.

I've got about 600 rds so I'm ok for a while

That leatherwood doesn't look bad, hows the clarity?

Arrives tomorrow.

Hehe, some ranges require the silly things so might as well hold on to it.

Bought this a couple of weeks ago I guess. Neat rifle, easy to clean and disassemble, looks well built. Waiting for the weather to get a little nicer before I take it out. Has a nice feel to it. I need to find a decent optics set so I can try out those 200m shots (the orange thing is a barrel block that came with it)

Welcome to form letterville.

The NRA screwed the pooch on that add, anyone who thinks different is kidding themselves. It pandered to their base and alienated a whole bunch of people who weren't before. The NRA needs to remove the top 5 people there and get some non frothing at the mouth types who can communicate intelligently and not embarrass the gun owning community. Long story short, they need to stop pitching adds to the hillbilly/rednecks and target the middle class. That's where the voting power is.

The funny thing is, I wouldn't oppose universal background checks for example. In most states you really don't know who you are selling to most of the time. I'd propose a trade, ditch NJ's FID BS and require NICS checks for all purchases. Never going to happen though sigh.