mggtz

They should all turn themselves in for treason.

True, someone showed me that and we all know how strange and confusing NJ firearm laws are.

2. Any firearm manufactured under any designation, which is substantially identical to any of the firearms listed in paragraph 1 above. As used in this definition, the term "substantial" means pertaining to the substance, matter, material or essence of a thing and the term "identical" means exactly the same. Hence, a firearm is substantially identical to another only if it is identical in all material, essential respects. A firearm is not substantially identical to a listed assault firearm unless it is identical except for differences that do not alter the essential nature of the firearm. The following are examples of manufacturer changes that do not alter the essential nature of the firearm: the name or designation of the firearm; the color of the firearm; the material used to make the barrel or stock of the firearm; the material used to make a pistol grip; and a modification of a pistol grip. This is not an exclusive list. A semi-automatic firearm should be considered to be "substantially identical," that is, identical in all material respects, to a named assault weapon if it meets the below listed criteria: i. A semi-automatic rifle that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine and has at least two of the following: (1) A folding or telescoping stock; (2) A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon; (3) A bayonet mount; (4) A flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor; and (5) A grenade launcher; http://www.state.nj.us/njsp/info/pdf/firearms/062408_title13ch54.pdf

I have gone to Starbucks while in uniform and have received coffee or whatever I have ordered free multiple times.

http://www.lifeproof.com/

Great video...We also need to get rid of ALL the ridiculous "Assault Firearm" unconstitutional provisions in NJ gun laws as well..!

“N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4c provides reasonable gun control limitations on a person’s ability to carry a firearm in New Jersey, which is ‘clearly within the police power of the State and must be accepted by the individual though it may impose a restraint or burden on him.’” Are they serious???? Completely unacceptable. The right to keep and BEAR arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. How do judges come to these decisions? They should be ashamed of themselves.

In In re Matter of Denial of Application of George J. Downing Permit to Carry, No. A-5108-09 (App. Div. April 25, 2011), George Downing appealed the trial court’s denial of his application for a carry permit. The trial court ruled that he failed to prove “a justifiable need to carry a handgun,” as required by N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4c. Downing did not challenge the trial court’s factual determination on appeal, and he conceded that the statute did not restrict the possession in one’s own home of firearms. Instead, he challenged the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4c, arguing that its limitation on who may carry a firearm in the State violated the Second Amendment of the federal Constitution. Downing relied on District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), to support his position. The Appellate Division first noted that Downing’s basis for requesting a carry permit was “generalized fears for personal safety,” which does not rise to the level of N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4c’s “justifiable need to carry a handgun.” The Appellate Division then found that Downing had not proven that N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4c was unconstitutional. The court explained that the statutory provision did not in any limit the use of handguns or firearms within the home, which was the type of restriction found to be unconstitutional in McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. __ (2010), and Heller. Concluding its analysis, the Appellate Division reasoned that “N.J.S.A. 2C:58-4c provides reasonable gun control limitations on a person’s ability to carry a firearm in New Jersey, which is ‘clearly within the police power of the State and must be accepted by the individual though it may impose a restraint or burden on him.’” Accordingly, the Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s ruling. http://www.keepandbeararms.com/

Yes you can OC in Philly ONLY with a ccw. Under PA law, one can not carry, open or concealed, in a city of First Class, which is Plhilly with out first obtaining a CCW.

On Andrew Wilkow today, he said that the police down there where thinking of filing excessive force charges against her for firing to rounds at the intruder. Absolutely ridiculous..!

The militia, or the adult male population at the time in which the colonies had militia laws that required every man between the ages of 16 and 60 to procure their own firearms and ammunition to be kept for emergencies.

DOH, oh well..they don't care what we say anyway....they are stuck in libetardia anyhow.!

Done..!

This is what I wrote to Assemblyman Louis D. Greenwald facebook page: Mr. Assemblyman, please explain how the proposed AB3807 in anyway helps anyone. So, instead of introducing a bill that would be helpful, you are trying to introduce that would be unhelpful? Criminals are going to commit crimes BECAUSE they are criminal and do not care about the law anyway. Please introduce a bill t...hat would help the cause of limited government and protection of individual liberties, moreover, laws on the books that one can stand your ground in self defense and concealed carry laws that mirror the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania would be the start. The people of New Jersey deserve better from elected officials and are entitled to their rights endowed from their creator as free men from birth.

Then when it is all finished the NJSP would arrest everyone for unlawful possession of a weapon and possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose.....Seriously, they probably would...!