Jump to content

intercooler

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    1,820

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    100%

Posts posted by intercooler

  21. Posted

    The Supreme Court decision in Caetano does not allow for carrying of stun guns. Basically it was just guidance for the Mass. Supreme Court that the complete ban on possessing stun guns is unconstitutional. The only issue answered by the decision is that bearable arms not in existence at the time of the writing of the Second Amendment are covered by the Second Amendment, nothing else. So states can still place all kinds of limits on stun guns as long as they don't outright ban them. Things will change and change soon, but this case changed nothing. There weren't even oral arguments in the case.

     

    Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

    aaahhhem, awb not legal then is it...

    here is why:

     

    As the libs have struggled to take away freedom, they created a classification of weapons...clearly this implies that they have BANNED  bearable arms by a category. it's the same as a stun gun basically

    oh boy, I see where this is going

  22. Posted

    That may be the case here in Sussex county. But this is state code, and it trumps all local or county regulations. Even though the county regulations may be stricter slightly. This code is adopted state wide. Every building on every property in the state, is subject to the plumbing code.

     

    e6a6f52059bd02b7ab8333169fcd93dd.jpg

    the town has to adopt the uniform code...it can be modified at the pleasure of the governing body

    the one you are showing also EXCLUDES it based on the proximity of sewer.

  23. Posted

    It's state law. If sewers are available you MUST hook up. No choice in the matter.

    no. This is a law in Sussex county set by the Freeholders and SCMUA, IF there are existing sewers within a certain distance.

     

    The towns can require it, but there are plenty that don't.There are other "safeguards" such as the famous Wantage  law that basically requires a new septic install with a change of ownership.

  25. Posted

    1) sounds illegal, but i'm sure there's some little known technicality that lets them do this.

    2) probably just another way around raising property taxes. they probably figure if they can't raise property, they'll just find a way to add a new tax(by adjusting usage lower) and use that money

    its legal..they had a meeting and passed an ordinance or amendment

     

    it's not likely that they are doing it as you think. The MUA likely raised the rates significantly that they could not absorb the cost anymore.

     

    You now have an EDUCATION ON WHAT HAPPENS  when you don't go to meetings or make sure you vote in Municipal elections...

    this is the EXACT reason I ran for my town council.

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...