-
Content Count
7,896 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14 -
Feedback
100%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Forms
Calendar
Blogs
Gallery
Company Directory
Everything posted by JackDaWack
-
I did not apply under "this section", as it was legislatively amended after the fact. I did not get my permit under the current (Dec 2022 rev.) 2c:58-4, that's the entire point of ex post facto. You can't change any part of a law and have it apply retroactively. It makes no difference if it's adding or amending sections, subsections, paragraphs, subparagraphs or clauses. A section is not simply defined by its nomenclature, it's inclusive of everything found within it. By your standards, the legislator could just change sections to anything they want and claim they always existed... That's not even a different argument, it's the entire argument.
-
NJ BPU Meets Today To Ban Your Gas Stoves
JackDaWack replied to 45Doll's topic in General Discussion
They did this with EPA wood stoves, regulate the hell out of them.. drive up costs.. Although I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to outright ban new construction -
NJ BPU Meets Today To Ban Your Gas Stoves
JackDaWack replied to 45Doll's topic in General Discussion
What else does decarbonization mean? -
Supreme Court has ruled on ex post facto laws, many of us have our permits prior to the passage of and/or when the laws went into effect. "A person who obtained pursuant to this section" doesn't apply to people who obtained them when that law didn't exist. Even better, the NJSP refer to the requirements as "interim" Indicating its not even "established", as it can change based on that language. It would seems the State is not doing itself any favors.
-
We're still missing the point. The law doesn't allow for them to revoke an approved license unless specific conditions are met. There is no retroactive statute on qualifications. My quals were done under the letter of law, and reviewed by a chief of police and Judge using the then current NJSP directives. It's not probable that my chief of police would even rescind my license without a statutory reason. I can just see how many people would end up in the cross hairs of a civil rights violation. I dont think my town would be willing to bet millions of dollars in lawsuits to revoke a handful of licenses.
-
Gun ForHire Radio #635 What a sh*t show the State of NJ is! Still waiting for “interim” qualification direction. As soon as we have it so will you. All GunForHire Alumni will be taken care of 100% so please hang tight! We got you, you have my word
JackDaWack replied to gunforhire's topic in Gun for Hire
Nappen is a fear mongerer. When have you seen him stand up to the state on his own accord? -
No, it's not law. I checked the laws, and cannot find where it says a current permit holder needs to requalify under these new standards. Matter of fact, I plan on being proactive in this respect and will be doing 2 things if this comes to fruition. 1. File a criminal complaint against whom ever attempts to illegally void my permit. 2. File an ethics complaint against the NJ AG to have him either remanded or disbarred for an illegal attempt in knowingly limiting my civil rights.
-
No problem, I will sue the state for fraud and violation of my civil liberties. Watch how fast they drop the charges. I have the resources. My permit was not issued with contingencies of qualifications to retain within the 2 year period, by law. This is purely scare tactics, from a legal standpoint none of this holds water for people with issued permits. The law does not give them power to void our permits under these conditions.
-
The only thing I can find that says you need to requilfiy is Evan Nappan... of course. If it ends up being true, Everyone who has a permit should go down to their PD and file a criminal complaint for fraud against the NJ AG(cost you nothing to do it). We paid money for a 2 year permit, and they were issued by them. Anything less than 2 years constitutes fraud by the state since these permits cost money.
-
Gun ForHire Radio #635 What a sh*t show the State of NJ is! Still waiting for “interim” qualification direction. As soon as we have it so will you. All GunForHire Alumni will be taken care of 100% so please hang tight! We got you, you have my word
JackDaWack replied to gunforhire's topic in Gun for Hire
At what point do we start filing ethics complaints against the NJ AG and get this guy disbarred? -
Gun ForHire Radio #635 What a sh*t show the State of NJ is! Still waiting for “interim” qualification direction. As soon as we have it so will you. All GunForHire Alumni will be taken care of 100% so please hang tight! We got you, you have my word
JackDaWack replied to gunforhire's topic in Gun for Hire
At what point do we start filing ethics complaints against the NJ AG and get this guy disbarred? -
Are you trying to get the state to pay for it? Anyone can pull an inground tank for about 2k if it's not leaking and it's a clean pull, permits and inspections and critical. I have not seen any requirements to install another tank above ground and used for a period of time. I think the state runs a program to "move" the tank from under ground to above ground.. some restrictions apply because they don't want to fund people removing the tanks for alternative fuel sources which would eat away at the funds primary purpose. I've done a few projects requiring permits around the house, your best bet it to just call the building and permitting department in your town and ask them for any and all information on removing an inground tank.
-
List of NJ Businesses posting 'No Guns' signs
JackDaWack replied to 10X's topic in Current New Jersey Gun Laws Discussion
I have very little issue with anyone, just a matter of curiosity. I dont particularly care, but continuity on a forum and active threads is important as a function of reading threads. If you feel the disruption is warranted, you do you brother. -
List of NJ Businesses posting 'No Guns' signs
JackDaWack replied to 10X's topic in Current New Jersey Gun Laws Discussion
What's the purpose of posting here when you're purging your account? -
You have to be nucking futz to open an FFL with out at least a LLC. I thought there was no regulations on 02 and 03 SOT as an 01 or 07 FFL. You can still sell and bid on state contracts for NFA and sell to LEO and transfer out of state stampable items? As an 07, you would need a NJ manufacturer license, too.