Spartiati

Won’t be heard until next session in the fall.

NY briefing has not been stayed yet. In fact the petitioners have requested that the motion be denied. Would be great if SCOTUS denied the motion and said nice try NY. As for NJ the court will now schedule it for conference. Should be soon. I would think it will go to conference within next couple weeks. Then it’s just a matter of how many conferences it takes for them to make a decision...

Agree it was somewhat obvious but wouldn’t call it cowardly. No reason to allow SCOTUS to review this as the law was stupid to begin with and by allowing people to transport really doesn’t bring on much risk to the public. They know this would have been a lost cause. So it’s a fight not worth taking as SCOTUS will likely finally strike down the use of lower levels of scrutiny.

Smart move from the left..They are working together across the country to try and limit impact to other jurisdictions. Will interesting to see what SCOTUS does here.

Thanks for providing the details!

Don’t know what the “official” capacity is but I’ve done 1000 cases at a time no problem.

Indeed it should! Great build.

Thank you Tony!

I will not be attending....

Have some reloading supplies I'd like to sell. 1. 5 Boxes of Federal Premium Small Rifle Match Primers (1000/box) - NO. GM205M - $30 per box 2. 1 Box of Frontier Metal CMJ Bullets 9mm 115gr RN (1000 count) - $70 3. 1 Box of Frontier Metal CMJ Bullets 10mm/40 S&W 180gr RNFP (500 count) - $100 4. 2 Boxes of Sierra .22cal .224 dia 77gr HPBT Match King 9377 7"-8" twist barrels only (500 count) - $100 per box (50 rounds used in one of the boxes) 5. 1 pound of Winchester WSF Powder - $25 (I have an open bottle with about a 1/4 pound that I will include in the price) Pick-up only in Scotch Plains, NJ.

Looking to sell my brass tumbler. Fantastic heavy duty machine works great. I am selling as I am no longer reloading. Asking $250, pick-up only. Located in Scotch Plains, NJ.

Unfortunately the 9th circus will swoop in and present a strained argument for how it is constitutional...

What video? I don’t need to watch a video I read the opinion. The opinion is that the law is not constitutional because it is an impossible burden in the home. It doesn’t say a thing about the fee. Read the opinion. This will do nothing in NJ.

Read the opinion regardless of whether or not it goes to SCOTUS it doesn’t challenge NJ regime except you can’t require in FID in the home which we already have.

That’s not the argument. Has nothing to do with fees. The judge is only saying it is unconstitutional to require the ID to possess in the home. This will not help us.