Jump to content

Spartiati

Members
  • Content Count

    434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
  • Feedback

    83%

Everything posted by Spartiati

  1. Ah ok, was in and out working and listening, that makes a lit more sense.
  2. Couldn’t agree more. Cai was much better prepared today. I think her argument that just because there wasn’t a law on the books doesn’t mean the founders wouldn’t have prohibited regulation of the kind gave Blumb some pause, but in the end SCOTUS was clear we have to go by what was there not by what could have been. Jensen was a disaster. Schmutter ok but did’t hammer down on the point that all of the states historical references are off base. The last attorney who presented for the legislature was also a disaster, but he was successful in getting Bumb to go down the balancing of interests which is a no no. I think he was even surprised Bumb went there. Will be interesting to see how this comes out. Was really surprised how few question or challenges Bumb had for the State, she kind of just let them talk. Hoping she just has her mind made up but from her order where she chastised the state for not answering her questions in their brief was surprised there wasn’t more heat on the state, not that there wasn’t any hut I didn’t get the sense the State was knocked of balance. Jensen and Scmutter had a lot of awkward pauses when pressed by Bumb.
  3. Sotomayor didn't decline to hear the case, she chose to bring it to all 9 justices who then declined to intervene because the second circuit hadn't, and still hasn't, issued an opinion on the matter. The 3rd circuit would first have to issue an opinion with a stay before Alito and the court would intervene.
  4. Alito would be the justice at the SCOTUS that would review an appeal to a 3rd circuit order. We aren’t there yet. Basically Bumb is saying you agreed to the tine table, if you appeal I’m putting my pencil down. On appeal to the 3rd by the state my guess is the 3rd will say they are not touching it until Bumb rules on the PI which is based on timing the State already agreed to.
  5. It was addressed, however the judge felt the Plaintiff’s didn’t have standing. So no judgment made as of yet on the constitutionality.
  6. I actually feel sorry for Cai, it must suck to have to be the face of the state on this. Above is summary seemed like here responses were those of someone who knows she has no chance. Can’t wait for the transcript.
  7. Couldn’t agree more. There’s only so much people can take. The AG office knows this is not defendable and are tired of looking like morons in court. So instead the state will take unlimited tax payer money hire outside counsel who are trained to say anything for money.
  8. Next is TRO for the other sensitive areas contained in Siegel and was just filed with Bumb, may or may not need another hearing for that. After a ruling is made on that a date will be set for injunction hearing.
  9. Funny how the law is so bad even the Biden judge agreed with the Bush judge.
  10. Are you an attorney? I am, thanks for the lesson though. Is your desire to see the TRO stayed? If so, why are you here? I suppose to keep us all grounded in our expectations. Thanks for that...
  11. Anthony has indicated the consolidation into Koons, that means it is Bumb's case now. This is exactly what we wanted.
  12. I agree, an opinion has already been written, why recreate. Also I don't know if folks are familiar with Williams she is not left wing. Her jurisprudence is quite centered. In fact Dem's really didn't want her on the bench.
  13. They won’t appeal. This was a unanimous court decision. SCOTUS wont touch until the 2nd here’s arguments and issues a ruling.
  14. Agree, SCOTUS not going to go out on a limb just yet when the 2nd hasn't even heard arguments yet for the injunction. The message is clear from Alito though the 2nd needs to move their asses.
  15. NJ submitted their response on 12/30. The hearing for Injunction is scheduled for Jan 5th.
  16. This is the Second Circuit Appeals court which is based in NY. That Stayed the Injunction but not fully. NY can’t enforce churches and Airports, read the opinion. This is also temporary until the Second Circuit hear’s oral argument which will occur within 2 months….
  17. It’s a temporary stay until the 3 judge panel in the 2nd circuit reviews the motion. They will then come back and either really stay the injunction, at which point defendants will appeal that to SCOTUS, or they will deny the motion for stay. All this maneuvering is just to determine whether NY can enforce the law while it moves through the legal system. Once the decision is determined on stay the case will then be scheduled to actually be heard at the district court.
  18. Honestly, I hope and pray ANJPRC is looking to challenge the entire framework of NJ firearm law which imbedded in this bill not just the sensitive place, for instance FID, Pistol Permits (All that is required in majority of states is NICS for these two), 30 day rule, excessive fees, excessive penalties, excessive delays as a result of all this non-sense, there is absolutely no history or tradition of it. This is a real opportunity to get rid of all of this in one lawsuit. I just hope they make sure they have lined up the right Plaintiff's so that there is Standing on all these violations of the constitution.
  19. Well, the day has finally arrived. Picked up my PTC today from Scotch Plains PD in Union County. App was submitted on 8/15 so little over 2 months.
×
×
  • Create New...