Jump to content

Soju

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    2,258

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by Soju

  1. Posted

    It doesn't mean what a literate logical person would think it means. As already stated, "justifiable need" is better defined as "have political connections".

     

    It truly is as simple as that.

     

    NJ wants you to be a victim. They need people to rely on them, government. Anything to the contrary is either made illegal, or met with hostility. So things like defending yourself? That is right out. Call a cop. If the criminal trying to kill you fails they will respond in time to finish the job. 

  3. Posted

    So it's legal outside, and it's legal in your "apartment".. but if we allow it in our common spaces it will be a war-zone?

     

    Thank you! I'm glad somebody understands. 

     

    I mean, you are of course safe inside your own home/apartment or whatever, because it's your home. And outside you are safe, because that is where the police are to protect you. But these common areas, no police, no safety of your own home, equals war-zone. I don't know if you spend much time in DE, but like 90% of all crime takes place in common  spaces. Death traps. You add more guns to the mix, it gives Syria a run for their money.

  4. Posted

    Incorrect.

     

    Shawn titled the thread "Crazy Censorship" alluding to the fact that it was purposeful and done by an entity looking to change or delete people's speech.

     

    If he said "hey, this is weird", "check this out" or "You cant text the word 'Obama'", different story altogether, but that wouldn't have been enough drama.

     

    ETA: I just tried it and it "Obama" was not deleted.

    You mean like he did?

     

     

     

     

    I don't know why but try it

     

    I don't know. Thought its weird. I had someone tell me today. I tried it. I then tried on my wife's phone. Same thing.

     

    Apple says its a glitch

     

     

    :scratchhead:

  5. Posted

    Whats an       phone.  Wait...... and       phone.    What the hell!!        must be watching me!

     

    Who sounds like the loon now? All he said was that it happens, and he doesn't know why, but it is weird. No claims of anything like what you are saying. And he is right. I did it too my text too. It is weird. I don't know why it happened. This is both true, provable, and no conspiracy. In fact, the only 'conspiracy' I see is you claiming that it is one. Ironic?

     

     

    The radio waves must have bounced of the foil and got lost in the atmosphere. 

  6. Posted

    I just tested it. Obama was indeed deleted.

     

     

    Stop it.  You make a thread called "Crazy Censorship" in which you claim Obama cannot be sent via text message.   :rolleyes:

     

    Well it turn out that it's true, so.........

  7. Posted

    Not odd. A lot of people don't know how things work. I've seen people petition the White House on that silly website for all kinds of things the POTUS has no authority to do like change state gun laws. You can start a petition there for anything. It doesn't have to be legal or make any sense. People do all kinds of stuff contacting politicians to do stuff they don't have the authority to do.

     

    What I'd like to see is an investigation to prosecute any of Kessler's goons who interfered with people entering the town hall (if they did do that) for civil rights violations.

    That's a good point. I guess it really isn't odd at all, more stupid than anything.

     

    Also, yes, if people really did interfere and prevent people from entering, that is certainly a big issue. I'm not sure I believe those claims however...

  10. Posted

    No, read on.

     

     

     

    Law enforcement is a state function of the National Guard. The governor sending in the National Guard is not a violation of Posse Comitatus. Done all the time in natural disasters and riots. sending in federal troops would be a violation.

    You didn't find it odd people were petitioning the white house for use of the PA National Guard instead of the Governor of Pennsylvania? Maybe I'm just weird then. I found that odd.

  11. Posted

    I'm just going to post this quote from the article here..............

     

     

    In the meantime, a petition at WhiteHouse.gov asking the Pennsylvania National Guard to “remove Kessler and his thugs” is gaining support. The petition has accrued nearly 1,000 signatures since being posted several days ago.

     

    See anything strange? 

  12. Posted

    Guy tries to upgrade and maintain property.

     

    Town tells him no unless he pays them for permits.

     

    Guy has no money for all these permits, is unable to maintain property.

     

    Town tells guy he has to keep the property maintained or they will take his property.

     

    Guy is forced to spend money fighting town just to keep property, goes broke.

     

    Town takes guys property.

     

    Guy goes to town to kill those who took his property.

     

     

    Had those who worked for the town had any human decency, instead of stringing this guy out for every nickel and dime he had, could have just gave him the permits required to maintain his property and this all would have been avoided. The guy has a place to live. The town doesn't have to deal with him. Everybody goes on their merry way. Greed. Greed and power. Doing the right thing has no part in things these days it would appear. 

  13. Posted

    If he was not working... He can say whatever the hell he wants...

     

    True, and he did. Doesn't mean things don't have consequences. You know that.

     

    Many jobs, especially one where you are in the public eye, the employer has the ability to reprimand people for conduct done outside of work. This is reality.  Agreement is not conditional. 

     

    For the record, I'm not supporting action against him. I'm not supporting him calling people cock sucking libtards. I'm stating the reality of things. To represent a reprimand as unreasonable itself is unreasonable.

     

    The 1st Amendment states 'Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech'. It doesn't say that you have the freedom to not be fired from your job. 

  15. Posted

    which would be entirely unreasonable.. since being a law enforcement officer should not negate your right to speak your mind.. especially when the content of your statement is I support the constitution and have a problem with those that dont.. 

     

    I agree. It would be unreasonable if that is all he said. But I'm guessing if he is fired it would be for the calling certain politicians and other people libtards, cocksuckers and telling them to go eph themselves...part of his videos. There aren't too many jobs where you can tell someone they are a cocksucking libtard and expect them not to fire you...

  19. Posted

    I'm amazed at some of the movies you guys think qualify for 'worst movie you've paid to see'! Sure, some of those movies weren't very good, but some of them, you must have had some insanely misplaced expectations for. I can't imagine what you are expecting movies like Half Baked, Sucker Punch (which was awesome BTW), Blood Valentine 3D, The Last Airbender, Water World, and Blood Beach to be like. These movies aren't exactly suppose to have riveting plots to them...

  21. Posted

    because imagine how many people will realize that these statist bastards actually don't have their best interests at heart when they found out they they've been willfully manipulated.

    Probably not many. What is that saying I think someone posted here recently? "It is easier to fool somebody than to convince them they have been fooled." Or something like that.

  22. Posted

    The pointing of a firearm at a suspected danger area by a LEO is considered "Constructive Force". It is on par with giving commands such as "Show me your hands" or "Don't move". It is the lowest Use of Force there is and has been such or decades. As long as as it is "reasonable" - and covering an unknown in a danger area while searching for a terrorist that has just shot it out with police and detonated explosives is most assuredly "reasonable" and is 100% in policy.

    I actually agree. The issue is, this only holds true when select individuals do it. If someone who isn't a LEO or government agent points a firearm at someone they think might be a threat, they get to go to jail for brandishing or unlawful use of force. The same standard does not apply.

×
×
  • Create New...