Jump to content

MrSurfboard

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    273

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Posts posted by MrSurfboard

  5. Posted

    33 minutes ago, DirtyDigz said:

    This needs to be hammered back at the legislators.  Is L.E. excluded from the requirement?  For what reason?  Is there any scenario in which a police officer could fire their weapon and an investigator would NOT want the expended cartridge to be traced back to a particular service weapon?

    (Not that I believe microstamping is legitimate, but this is a great counter argument to the real intent of the legislation, and ties in the progressive "the police are oppressors/enablers of systemic racism" narrative).

    You can bet your bottom dollar LE will be exempt. As there are no production handguns that employ micro stamping, and there probably won’t be as it doesn’t work, that would be the only way cops could get new guns 

    1 hour ago, samiam said:

    I think expanding the list of so-called "destructive devices" is at least as important. When is the last time that list was expanded? If this becomes standard practice, why wouldn't these ass-clowns just keep expanding it? The ammo paperwork burden is pretty damned important, too. Regarding the microstamping, maybe a manufacturer could add the stamp to existing handguns that are shipped back to them. Yeah, that would suck big-time, and is a flagrant 2A violation (not that these assholes give shit one about that) and wouldn't work if the manufacturer was no longer in business, but it could make the difference between being "allowed" to keep your handgun, or not. The "over-50" redefinition of "destructive device" is an outright ban on certain firearms, including one I happen to own.   

    As I read it, micro stamping would only apply to new handguns sold in the state. So there would be no requirement for existing guns to have it. Yet 

  6. Posted

    2 minutes ago, contigo100 said:

    There trying to run us out of town, simple as that! Your deluding yourself if you think Sweeney will be our savior or if you thought all of the new NJ gun owners would have changed anything, it won't! These bills will pass in the next 60 days and we are looking at least 3 more waves before Murphy leaves office. He passes a wave of gun bills AT LEAST ANNUALLY.. There are able to pass laws faster than we can file lawsuits, it's really simple they throw 100 jabs while we can only throw 1 uppercut! The anjrpc and nj2as will be unable to stop this continued onslaught of bills aimed squarely at the legal NJ gun owner. There sending us a message COMPLY OR LEAVE THE STATE! The upcoming SCOTUS ruling will not affect any of the proposed bills. I try to ignore the people who say "you will never be able to carry NEVER" but, lately im thinking they may be right. NJ law enforcement have never been our friends and are actually the biggest threat to gun owners as they are the sole enforcers of these draconian laws. Think some LEO will take it easy on you when your FID expires! think again!

    And with Sweeney gone, there will be nothing in the senate to keep these bills from coming to the floor 

  14. Posted

    On 1/18/2018 at 8:07 AM, JimB1 said:

    Fact is Dems have been waiting for this for 8 years or more, it doesn’t matter what nj2as or any other group does, the only thing that may slow them down is legal action or previously judged items like 7 round magazines. That may stop the 5 round magazine thing in favor of 10 which has not been successfully fought in MA so they have no fear of passing it here where 5 is a gamble. 

    I have no confidence at all in nj2as or any other group to do anything to stop or even slow this legislatively. If they show tangible results in the coming months, my opinion may change but for now, I doubt this is anything other then an ad to solicit money. 

    Also, for all the people banging the NRA, (all the “I’ve been a member for 200 years and they haven’t done squat for NJ!” stuff :) ) You know just being a member does nothing for gun rights political and legal fights right? By law, dues cannot be used for political lobbying since that is not the NRAs mission statement or allowed because of their tax status, that’s why they created the NRA-ILA. It has separate funding for political action and legal defense. If you are concerned about legal and political issues, that is the place to put money not the NRA general donations, that money can only go to education, safety programs and sporting... (and apparently a ton of mailing and ads :huh: ) but that is national level stuff though they do back things when they get to federal court from states. For real state specific issues, you need to support the ANJRPC. 

    That said, I doubt they can do anything legislatively at this time either, the NJ legislature has been chomping at the bit for years, they aren’t going to waste this opportunity to push anything and everything they can with a yes man in the Gov seat.

    -Jim

     

    I agree.  NJ will soon take the crown as the state with the most restrictive gun laws in the nation. 

    Here is my take at what we’ll see

    10 round mag limit

    complete “assault weapons” ban with no grandfathering or exceptions

    internet ammo sales ban

    More disqualifications under 2C:58-3

    Smart gun mandate 

    Probably much, just can’t think of anymore right now 

  16. Posted

    2 hours ago, Old Glock guy said:

    Silly question, but before they further restrict 2A rights, shouldn't they be required to show how it will make the public safer?  Specifically, adjustable stocks, pistol grips, flash hiders, bayo lugs, mag limits are all a bunch of BS that will protect no one.

    Just asking rhetorically, because I realize I'm preaching to the choir here.  

    Gun laws have nothing to do with safety. They are designed to slowly erode gun ownership until all guns are illegal to own. 

    • Like 2

  18. Posted

    4 hours ago, John Boy said:

    And if they don't, any semi auto rifle or shotgun with a forearm (hand guard) will be illegal in the definition of 'assault firearm'... as a Remington 1100 or a Remington 7400, etc, even the  Contender Thompson Sub Machine Gun  https://images.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=A0LEVvuD22BaNk0A3jInnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTByMjB0aG5zBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzYw--?p=Contender+Thompson+Sub+Machine+Gun&fr=yhs-mozilla-002&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002

    I think that’s the intent of the law 

    • Like 1

  21. Posted

    On 12/29/2017 at 9:25 AM, jackandjill said:

    ----

    While she was searching for her license, officers spotted a concealed weapons permit, according to a press release.

    An investigation revealed Gracey had the handgun in her purse, authorities said.

    ---------

    Lets hope a competent lawyer would have it thrown out, unless the law abiding answered questions fully and honestly. We will see. 

    Why would it be thrown out? After seeing the CC permit, the officer probably followed up with “are you carrying a Weapon?”  If she said yes, game over, good collar. 

  22. Posted

    In my opinion, there is a gulf of difference between Allan's case and this one.  Allan was basically ignorant and got caught in the shitty fly trap NJ is.  The CO otoh was almost certainly aware of the laws here and willfully diregarded NJ law because he felt he is "special".  Honestly, I feel bad for the guy because as a CO he is under real and constant threat from inmates or their homies.  He should be able to carry legally. 

    I doubt it, he probably thought he was covered under LEOSA. 

×
×
  • Create New...