Jump to content

Downtownv

Premier Member
  • Content Count

    1,282
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10
  • Feedback

    100%

Everything posted by Downtownv

  1. There are some big 2a cases finally being heard,we can only hope they rule on constitutionality and politically.
  2. Remember he serves at the Gov's disgression, although I don't care for him, many of the Troopers, like him.
  3. Jack is a RINO so not going anywhere. Like Biden he's got a plan, where was it all these years?
  4. Sadly, No. There are lots of people that think his tryanny kept them safe. The Unions are in his hip pocket. He's one ugly basturd that insults the NJSP by wearing their gear daily.
  5. Well this contradicts your article: After Democrats Go After The Supreme Court – Amy Coney Barrett Turns The Tables On Them By Adam Casalino|September 13, 2021 Share What’s Happening: Democrats had a total meltdown after the Supreme Court refused to block a Texas pro-life law. Since that time, they have renewed calls to pack the Supreme Court. They can’t stand that the court sometimes rules against their agenda. So, their only “solution” is to poison the court’s authority through court packing, so it will only give them verdicts they like. So much for democracy, huh? But they just got a rude awakening by one top justice. Democrats whine and complain that the court is pushing politics. But Amy Coney Barrett just blasted them, saying “No… you do that.” From Fox News: “My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks,” Barrett said, according to the Louisville Courier Journal. “The media, along with hot takes on Twitter, report the results and decisions… That makes the decision seem results-oriented,” Barrett added, according to the Courier Journal. “And here’s the thing: Sometimes, I don’t like the results of my decisions. But it’s not my job to decide cases based on the outcome I want.” ACB humiliated Democrats when she revealed that the Supreme Court is not made up of “partisan hacks.” Their decisions are not swayed by what might happen. Instead, they rule based on the law and Constitution. This might be upsetting news to Democrats, who seem to think conservative judges are as political as many liberal judges. But a good justice, regardless of political leaning, does not focus on partisan motives when deciding cases. They make decisions based on what the law says and whether or not a case has any merit. Barrett explained they are not trying to figure out what the results would be outside the court. She even admitted she doesn’t always agree with the outcomes. But that doesn’t matter. What matters is the law and the Constitution. Democrats seem to think they can bend our laws any way they like. All to get the results they want. Their desire to pack the court is proof of that. They don’t get the outcome they like, so they try to cram the court to have their way. But if what Coney says is true, even court-packing won’t satisfy Democrats. Even good liberal justices should rule based on the law, not results or outcomes. Democrats might ram the court with 20 justices, but that doesn’t mean they’ll get their way. Then what will they do? Rip up the Constitution? Oh, wait, they’ve tried to do that many times before. Key Takeaways: Amy Coney Barret blasted Democrats, saying justices are not “partisan hacks.” She claimed the SCOTUS justices rule on “judicial philosophy” not on possible outcomes. This comes as Democrats renew calls to pack the Supreme Court. https://thepatriotjournal.com/supreme-court-dems-acb/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=pjnewsletter
  6. Sadly, This jackass will will handily. So this could be something that makes you feel both Happy and Sad.
  7. Where's creepy Joe's right Hand!!!!!!
  8. What are you talking about Joe loves sniffing, groping and nipple pinching young children despite the fact they are wearing Trump Gear!
  9. NJ Gov Talks Tough On Guns, But SCOTUS May Have The Last Word By Cam Edwards | Sep 13, 2021 9:30 AM ET Governor Dooooshe Bag⬇︎⬇︎⇩ Chris Pedota/The Record via AP, Pool New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy is bolstering his gun control bona fides ahead of Election Day in November, but no matter how much he sings the praises of the state’s draconian gun laws, the Supreme Court is getting ready to deal with several cases that could have a huge impact on the Second Amendment rights of residents. Murphy recently held campaign appearance in which the issues of gun control and the privilege of owning and carrying a gun (don’t dare call it a right in New Jersey) were front and center. About 200 or so people were in the audience and the governor was joined on the podium by, among others, Reps. Donald Payne Jr. and Mikie Sherrill, Assemblyman Lou Greenwald, who trekked up from south Jersey, and Fred Guttenberg, whose daughter was killed in the Parkland, Fla. mass shooting in 2018. More than an outing to show support for gun laws, this was a time to slam Republican candidate Jack Ciattarelli, who has questioned some of the state’s gun regulations. “We don’t want to go backward on this issue,” said Greenwald. contending that when it comes to guns, Ciattarelli may turn the state into Florida or South Dakota. Those states are not normally mentioned in the same breath, but both have outspoken Republican governors. Those following this campaign know that Republicans often criticize Murphy for allegedly wanting to turn New Jersey into California. Now Democrats have their own states to play with. Murphy joined in on the criticism, saying that Ciattarelli wants to make it easier for people in certain professions to carry concealed weapons. One of those professions is Realtor. “You would have to tell me what the heck that means,” Murphy said. Murphy can ask the Republican candidate himself when the pair meet for a debate two weeks from now, but I’ll take a stab at it. New Jersey is one of the handful of states around the country that still have a “may issue” carry law in place, which means that the average citizen can’t obtain a permit to carry regardless of their circumstances. It sounds to me like Ciattarelli believes that working in certain professions that carry an increase risk of violent assault should be seen as “good cause” to receive a permit. While Ciattarelli isn’t calling for the adoption of a “shall issue” system, the Supreme Court might not leave it up to the next governor or the New Jersey legislature to decide on any changes to the permitting process. The Court will hear oral arguments in a case dealing with New York’s “may issue” laws in November, and when the nine justices gather for their first conference of the fall term on September 27th, they’re set to consider accepting a number of other 2A-related cases, including two lawsuits challenging New Jersey’s carry laws and its ban on so-called large capacity magazines. In Russell v. New Jersey, attorney Evan Nappen and plaintiff Reb Russell II are asking the Court to decide the following questions: 1. Whether the Second Amendment protects the right to carry arms outside of the home for self-defense. 2. Whether the government may deny lawabiding citizens their exercise of the right to carry a handgun outside of their homes by conditioning the exercise of the right on showings of need. Russell is substantially similar to the New York case already accepted by SCOTUS, so it’s possible that the Court will keep ahold of this case until the justices have issued their decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which is expected to come down next May or June. The second case, known as Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs v. Bruck, takes on New Jersey’s mag ban, which not only made it illegal to purchase a new magazine that can hold more than ten rounds, but made it a crime for those who lawfully purchased a magazine to continue to possess it. Attorney Paul Clement, who’s also representing the NYSPRA in its upcoming Supreme Court fight, is the attorney of record in the ANJRPC litigation, says the case provides SCOTUS with the opportunity to address two serious questions about the New Jersey ban. 1. Whether a blanket, retrospective, and confiscatory law prohibiting ordinary law-abiding citizens from possessing magazines in common use violates the Second Amendment. 2. Whether a law dispossessing citizens without compensation of property that was lawfully acquired and long possessed without incident violates the Takings Clause. So, while Phil Murphy may be running against Jack Ciattarelli, the biggest threat to the governor’s anti-gun agenda is actually the Supreme Court and not the Republican gubernatorial candidate, who is promising moderate reforms like including a grandfather clause in any new gun control legislation and the aforementioned improved access to carry permits for those in some dangerous professions. Actually, I suppose the biggest threat to Murphy’s agenda is the Constitution itself, especially if the Court grants cert to either of the New Jersey cases its set to consider in just a few weeks. https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2021/09/13/nj-gov-talks-tough-on-guns-but-scotus-may-have-the-last-word-n49865
  10. This needs no explanation - and is a fun read, no matter your gender. Men Are Just Happier People! What do you expect from such simple creatures? Your last name stays put. The garage is all yours. Wedding plans take care of themselves. Chocolate is just another snack. You can never be pregnant. You can wear a white T-shirt to a water park. You can wear NO shirt to a water park. Car mechanics tell you the truth. The world is your urinal. You never have to drive to another gas station restroom because this one is just too icky. You don't have to stop and think of which way to turn a nut on a bolt. Wrinkles add character. Wedding dress - $5,000. Tux rental - $100. People never stare at your chest when you're talking to them. New shoes don't cut, blister, or mangle your feet. One mood all the time. Phone conversations are over in 30 seconds flat. You know stuff about tanks. A five-day vacation requires only one suitcase. You can open all your own jars. You get extra credit for the slightest act of thoughtfulness. If someone forgets to invite you, he or she can still be your friend. Your underwear is $8.95 for a three-pack. Two pairs of shoes are more than enough. You almost never have strap problems in public. You are unable to see wrinkles in your clothes. Everything on your face stays its original colour. The same hairstyle lasts for years, maybe decades. You only have to shave your face and neck. You can play with toys all your life. One wallet and one pair of shoes - one colour for all seasons. You can wear shorts no matter how your legs look. You can 'do' your nails with a pocket knife. You have freedom of choice concerning growing a moustache... You can do Christmas shopping for 25 relatives on December 24 in 25 minutes. No wonder men are happier! NICKNAME · If Laura, Kate, and Sarah go out for lunch, they will call each other Laura, Kate and Sarah. If Mike, Dave and John go out, they will affectionately refer to each other as Fat Boy, Bubba, and Wild man. EATING OUT · When the bill arrives, Mike, Dave and John will each throw in $20, even though it's only for $32.50. None of them will have anything smaller and none will actually admit they want change back. When the girls get their bill, outcome the pocket calculators. MONEY. A man will pay $2 for a $1 item he needs . A woman will pay $1 for a $2 item that she doesn't need but it's on sale. BATHROOMS · A man has six items in his bathroom: toothbrush and toothpaste, shaving cream, razor, a bar of soap, and a towel . The average number of items in the typical woman's bathroom is 337. A man would not be able to identify more than 20 of these items. ARGUMENTS · A woman has the last word in any argument. .. Anything a man says after that is the beginning of a new argument. FUTURE · A woman worries about the future until she gets a husband . A man never worries about the future until he gets a wife. MARRIAGE · A woman marries a man expecting he will change, but he doesn't. A man marries a woman expecting that she won't change, but she does. DRESSING UP · A woman will dress up to go shopping, water the plants, empty the trash, answer the phone, read a book, and get the mail. · A man will dress up for weddings and funerals. NATURAL · Men wake up as good-looking as they went to bed · Women somehow deteriorate during the night. OFFSPRING · Ah, children. A woman knows all about her children. She knows about dentist appointments and romances, best friends, favorite foods, secret fears, and hopes and dreams. · A man is vaguely aware of some short people living in the house. THOUGHT FOR THE DAY. A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing! So, send this to the women who have a sense of humour .... and to the men who will enjoy reading
  11. Carry on, my wayward Son....
  12. I called this establishment whio requires proof of the (non vaccine) vaccine. I asked him if he will provide me with a copy of all of his employees vaxx cards. He told me he will not and I asked then why do i need to show you mine. He suggested I don't come. You may want to call him as well he was very arrogant and I expext he's getting lots of calls! https://www.ruthiesbbq.com/ Ruthie's Bar-B-Q & Pizza in Montclair is requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination for indoor dining. WATCH: Will you dine at a restaurant that requires proof of vaccination? Tony Caputo is live. Potential customers are reacting to a decision to only allow vaccinated customers to dine inside the restaurant.
  13. Subject: Fw: Sign Language Virus-free. www.avg.com
  14. Hello. Hi, table for two, please. Sure, and your name. Rodger Great. And do you and your guest have your vaccination cards? We do. Can you tell us who our server will be? Um, looks like Brad will be your server tonight. Great. Can you show us Brad's vaccination card? Um... And also, can you provide me with proof that Brad is not a carrier of HIV, Hepatitis A or B, or any other communicable diseases? Um... Also, we would prefer not to be served by someone who is on or uses recreational drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, meth, fentanyl, etc, so if you could provide us with Brad's most recent tox screen, that would be great. Um... Let me get the manager for you. That would be great, thanks. On second thought, I'll need that info on everyone who works here, thanks for complying! Guess what’s good for the goose is good for the gander…
  15. This is better than "Who's on first" because it's not only complicated, it's a fact. COSTELLO : I want to talk about the unemployment rate in America. ABBOTT : Good Subject. Terrible Times. It's 5.6%. COSTELLO : That many people are out of work? ABBOTT : No, that's 23%. COSTELLO : You just said 5.6%. ABBOTT : 5.6% Unemployed. COSTELLO : Right 5.6% out of work. ABBOTT : No, that's 23%. COSTELLO : Okay, so it's 23% unemployed. ABBOTT : No, that's 5.6%. COSTELLO : WAIT A MINUTE. Is it 5.6% or 23%? ABBOTT : 5.6% are unemployed. 23% are out of work. COSTELLO : If you are out of work you are unemployed. ABBOTT : No, Obama said you can't count the "Out of Work" as the unemployed. You have to look for work to be unemployed. COSTELLO: BUT THEY ARE OUT OF WORK!!! ABBOTT : No, you miss his point. COSTELLO : What point? ABBOTT : Someone who doesn't look for work can't be counted with those who look for work. It wouldn't be fair. COSTELLO: To whom? ABBOTT : The unemployed. COSTELLO : But ALL of them are out of work. ABBOTT : No, the unemployed are actively looking for work. Those who are out of work gave up looking and if you give up, you are no longer in the ranks of the unemployed. COSTELLO: So if you're off the unemployment rolls that would count as less unemployment? ABBOTT : Unemployment would go down. Absolutely! COSTELLO : The unemployment just goes down because you don't look for work? ABBOTT : Absolutely it goes down. That's how it gets to 5.6%. Otherwise it would be 23%. COSTELLO : Wait, I got a question for you. That means there are two ways to bring down the unemployment number? ABBOTT : Two ways is correct. COSTELLO : Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job? ABBOTT : Correct. COSTELLO : And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking for a job? ABBOTT : Bingo. COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and the easier of the two is to have people stop looking for work? ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like a Democrat. COSTELLO: I don't even know what the hell I just said! ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like Biden.
  16. This weeks thing to ponder. VIDEO-2021-07-27-11-24-15.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...