The question is then the following, rather than spend thousands more on buying ruggedness that you will never likely use, is the gun owner better off buying a "good enough" optic and investing the difference in ammo and training instead?
Without a doubt, yes. Though I wouldn’t use such a unmeasurable term like “ruggedness” as the example. That’s a spectrum from “flimsy” to “bombproof” where the buyer is going to have to pick a point that is “good enough” for them.
When 'Good' is Good Enough
in New Jersey Gun Forums
A blog by Maksim
Posted
Without a doubt, yes. Though I wouldn’t use such a unmeasurable term like “ruggedness” as the example. That’s a spectrum from “flimsy” to “bombproof” where the buyer is going to have to pick a point that is “good enough” for them.