argetni

$65.99 for a 6 pack right now at gunmagwarehouse

Nothing is going to go in our favor. I sold all my 15 rounders on MeWe in a few hours and didn’t lose a cent on them. Easier to do it now before the market is flooded. I’m stuck in NJ for at least another 12 years so might as well suck it up I figure. I already have 10rd mags on the way for all my guns and still have a few bucks in my pocket. Hopefully NJ will stick to 10 since it follows the lead of CA which all the leftists masturbate to as their role model for gun grabbers. No gun crime in CA. Lol

Hex Mag 10/30 are $65.99 for 6 mags. Best way to comply and still have the "look" at least.

Well no prison time, but 10k fine EACH and you become a criminal. It even says they will make lots of money from the fines. Disgusting.

So it looks like reading the PDF we can keep the 15s and block them to 10 "legally", the question is how. Perhaps PK90 can offer a service, help some behind enemy lines and make some $$$.

Me too Still loving the 25 or so Paul mags I have

Yes I need to know if I should place a giant order for 15 rounders or not.

Sure is I paid $399

Per Evan Nappen Carrying Stun Guns and Tasers in NJ: This was posted by my friend and colleague Daniel Schmutter, an excellent attorney, regarding whether we can now CARRY tasers and stun guns. I agree with his legal analysis. Under NJ law, weapons are frequently governed by multiple statutes at the same time. So for example, there are per se prohibitions under 2C:39-3 for weapons such as switchblade knives, dirks, daggers, and stilettos. Then there is also the general prohibition in 2C:39-5(d) on possession of weapons under circumstances not manifestly appropriate for such lawful uses as it may have. Even though a dirk is subject to the per se prohibition of 2C:39-3, it is almost certainly also subject to the more general prohibition of 2C:39-5(d). So if, tomorrow, the legislature repealed the per se prohibition of dirks from 2C:39-3, a dirk would still be a weapon and therefore subject to the more general prohibition found in 2C:39-5(d). So now applying that to stun guns. Stun guns were previously per se illegal under 2C:39-3(h). The result of the lawsuit is that 2C:39-3(h) was stricken as unconstitutional. So it is no longer per se illegal. But a stun gun is still a weapon under 2C:39-1(r), and so it is almost certainly subject to the more general prohibition of 2C:39-5(d), that is, under circumstances not manifestly appropriate for such lawful uses as it may have. The lawsuit did nothing to change this, nor do the new proposed regulations. We know that under State v. Kelly, self defense does not count as a "lawful use" under 2C:39-5(d). The term "weapon" is very broadly defined under NJ Law. Thus, many items that fit the definition of "weapon" also have non-weapon uses, such as a baseball bat. So the idea is that the closer you are to possessing a weapon for its non-weapon purpose (like possession of a baseball bat at a baseball game), the better off you are under 2C:39-5(d). So now applying this to stun guns, its hard to imagine carrying a stun gun in public for a non-weapon purpose. Without such a non-weapon purpose, carrying around a stun gun poses a very substantial risk that you could be charged with violating 2C:39-5(d). So, I think folks would take a huge risk carrying around a stun gun.

This was posted to the Firearms NJ FB group http://files.constantcontact.com/ec763256301/953eff8f-9574-4793-ad8a-46cf3457cb21.pdf

Sweet when can I come over? I'll bring food and brews.

Madness, I hear people in South Jersey talking about shooting on their own property....must be nice!

My co-worker has a backyard range in Chester, NY. Can I bring my NJ Legal AR with 10rd mag(only have one of these sad things) to his house to shoot?

I ordered 4, 10rd mags for my 92FS so you know what I think