While I'm not surprised they passed on all the carry and feature ban lawsuits I can't understand how they did not take up the CA microstamp law. The technology does not exist so how can it be required.
I figured this would be a nice safe case to take and strike down a clearly unconstitutional law that would only affect the people of CA.
I can see NJ or some other commie state passing a "smart gun" law banning the sale of any gun that does not have the technology even though the technology does not exist. Why wouldn't they? The defendant's who file to block the law would have to invest thousands of dollars in the suit and spend years litigating it and maybe the Supreme court will hear the case or maybe not. Or maybe by then the technology will exist and they will moot the case.
I'm afraid after this round of cases I feel those of us that live in the commie states are doomed till we leave, but even then we will have to choose wisely where to go. Virginia has fallen and PA and FL are not far behind.