Fred2

Do you know something about civilization coming to an end that you're not sharing with us?

Now we have to push for a Stand Your Ground law.

this looks like the important part. (b) Each applicant shall demonstrate a thorough familiarity with the safe handling and use of handguns by indicating in the space provided therefor on the application form, and on any sworn attachments thereto, any relevant information. Thorough familiarity with the safe handling and use of handguns may be evidenced by: 1. Completion of a firearms training course substantially equivalent to the firearms training approved by the Police Training Commission as described by N.J.S.A. 2C:39-6j; 2. Submission of an applicant's most recent handgun qualification scores utilizing the handgun(s) he or she intends to carry as evidenced by test firings administered by a certified firearms instructor of a police academy, a certified firearms instructor of the National Rifle Association, or any other recognized certified firearms instructor; 3. Completion of a course or test in the safe handling of a handgun administered by a certified firearms instructor of a police academy, a certified firearms instructor of the National Rifle Association, or any other recognized certified firearms instructor; or 4. Passage of any test in this State's laws governing the use of force administered by a certified instructor of a police academy, a certified instructor of the National Rifle Association, or any other recognized certified instructor.

Based on #2, why should we require anything other than a back ground check? and I even question that.

I just saw this note from a legal type, regarding the ruling. It applies to NY, so states that push (Maryland) will have to have someone sue the state because the state law is unconstitutional based on this ruling. The state will lose, but it will take someone to follow through to do it. Some states have already said as much. (That their laws are unconstitutional but it will take someone going to court to change it). A smart legislator would push to amend the laws to match the ruling. We won’t see that.

What is the course of fire, and target that you have to hit?

What exactly does this mean? We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Constitutional carry?

Or just polish out the stamp?

Anyone interested in a bunch of of old catalogs? Located in Morristown, and you can pick them up here. Will trade for beer. This is about 89 POUNDS of catalogs Contains Issues: 14-26 (27 is missing) 30-39 (3 copied of 34) 40-41 (42 is missing) 43-49 50-54 (55 is missing) 56-59 60-64

and who is the bastard love child of Fidel Castro

The root cause of the problem is that people litter. Banning bags to stop litter is the same as banning guns to stop people from getting shot.

That looks like it was for real! https://thehistoryace.com/the-amount-of-hours-medieval-peasants-worked-per-week/

I looks like these guys are playing fast and loose with the financials. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/1791-management-sends-letter-to-black-rifle-coffee-company-brcc-demanding-they-brew-up-an-action-plan-to-address-serious-allegations-of-corporate-governance-failures-and-code-of-conduct-violations-301549388.html

This was be best comment on the article This is the end of the generation who thought they could get rich doing absolutely nothing...