chic013

Thank you. I shall do the same.

Thanks. I figured it would not be an issue. To your point, my only concern is a subjective TSA inspector not fully aware the FTX is not a true hollow point, per se and flagging it.

Hi All, I will be heading to Dallas next month out of EWR. Just checking to see if I'm okay to travel with Critical Defense ammo. (9MM FTX). American Airlines web page does not indicate a restriction, so I would guess I'm fine. I've traveled prior but packed ball ammo. This will be my first flight trip with the FTX ammo. Thanks for any tips or comments.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio/2019 The site states that audio from the weeks hearings are posted by end of week. Check in periodically to see when it hits.

I like the Taser Pulse. Nice feel, very light and is very much like my Glock 43 as far as size, so very concealable. Yes, it's pricy but as noted by others, you can legally carry it and it is at least something in the way of an insurance policy for personal defense while outside the home. The plus model has the ability to send your location via your smartphone to LE should you ever need to deploy it.

Welcome fellow UHGC'r....

Agree. However, Roberts needs to follow the Constitution. And must do so with strict scrutiny in our case. It is not supposed to be about wrestling with any personal views or outside noise. The 2A is clear and States within the union that attempt to usurp it must be stopped. I get your sentiment and I too feel he is the wildcard, but being on the high court, Roberts need to put that stuff aside and rule based on law. Hopeful on my end here and for us all.

I will read the response brief shortly, however, I agree with your assessment. I'm very optimistic that the true rule of law will be interpreted appropriately. My wish is for Justice Kavanaugh to write the opinion and stick it solely into the chest of one Cory Booker, who made a mockery of his confirmation hearing. No way Kavanaugh forgets Booker and payback/karma will be rightfully bestowed.

Very good assessment. I agree 100%.

Still infringement regardless. There is no inference of “need” in the 2A let alone “justifiable need”. They can cite all the cases they wish but the fact remains that NJ has instituted a de facto ban on carry and should be struck down. I think cert will be granted and Grewal et al will not prevail.

This Friday is the day for NJ to respond. Should be interesting.

I think there is some merit to this. Toss the anti-2A crowd a "bone" to keep them at bay. I watched the recent rally and was happy to hear him restate his 2A position. Hopeful for good things to come for us. Keeping the faith.

I’d have to think that can get what they wish now. If I’ve read the ruling right. If the law was found to be unconstitutional as I am understanding then any limitations are same. Time for NJ to get this case going or updated citing this ruling

Yep. Saw this. Can this be used to help our NJ case? CA Federal court ruling. Does the federal level have more weight in other states that have the same ban or restrictions?

Yes, very common. Stay the course.