Jump to content
82flh

receipts for your guns in NJ

Recommended Posts

so i went thru receipts to make sure i had 1 for each gun/rifle

im missing one for a tp9sfx is there a place to trace serial number since i cant remember

who i bought it from?...it was online purchase

also in NJ do they seize guns without proof of purchase?

i been scrambling trying to find the dam receipt

thanks in advance guys!

god bless

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You will only be arrested/charged for breaking any of the numerous NJ statutes.

There is no statute that says you must keep a receipt for any firearm acquired. I have transferred guns to friends with no money changing hands at all - no receipt to retain.

So long as you complied with the law when you acquired the pistol you're fine. Assuming you acquired it while a NJ resident so you will have executed a Permit to Purchase a Pistol (and form of register). A copy of that will have been sent to your issuing PD as well as the State Police. You also got a copy, but there is no penalty for losing it.

Buying the pistol online is irrelevant as it would have been sent to an FFL in NJ and they would have done the background check  before transferring it to you.

What you can be arrested/charged with is possessing it in circumstances prohibited in the statutes. Where you obtained it is secondary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, 82flh said:

so i went thru receipts to make sure i had 1 for each gun/rifle

im missing one for a tp9sfx is there a place to trace serial number since i cant remember

who i bought it from?...it was online purchase

also in NJ do they seize guns without proof of purchase?

i been scrambling trying to find the dam receipt

thanks in advance guys!

god bless

I don't think the receipts are that important.  If you bought it here, they have all the details already.  If you brought it with you in a move, inherited it, or bought it face-to-face back when it didn't have to go through an FFL, it's still legal, though admittedly harder to prove (but that burden should be on the state).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no guys....im still in TN moving back to NJ...i bought them here legally

i dont know if NJ requires receipts for people out of state...and of course the shitbags in NJ tell you nothing!...but m sure they'll be quick to seize anything without proof of purchase ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(Edit - II neglected to read you bought it in TN... maybe disregard :D )
More than receipts, it might be more important to hold onto the exercised handgun permit. (Feel free to educate me if that's not the case!)

The eligibility paperwork for long guns would probably be good to have as well, though I imagine not as much as the pistol permits.

Edited by Lawnmower2021

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it’s a legal firearm in NJ (ie: not an NFA item, not specifically named in the statute, and/or qualifies for the NJ AWB) and it was bought legally in the state you were living in prior to the move here, you can bring it to NJ with no paperwork required or needed.

If you wish, you can contact your local PD and do a VOLUNTARY registration to acquire NJ paperwork for each firearm as appropriate for the type (pistol vs rifle/shotgun), but again - that is voluntary and not compulsory.

Once here all NJ regulations apply to future purchases, transports, ammo restrictions, etc…

Do not make it harder than it has to be.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is one situation where having receipts for handgun transfers could save you grief:

If you acquired handgun(s) in NJ, those handguns are registered with NJSP through the transfer process.

If you continue to live in NJ, but sell one or more handguns outside of NJ, then it would be prudent to keep records of those sales.

If you are ever subject to firearm confiscation (say, due to domestic violence or red flag order), the police are going to come to your door with a list of a handgun(s) for you to surrender.  If you do not surrender every handgun on that list, or provide evidence as to why the handgun is no longer in your possession, then you can expect a search warrant to get executed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Hope a small clip doesn't break the vibe of pictures :P    
    • Any insight on the quality of this barrel? Looks like the use an FN in this set up.   https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-16-chf-1-7-m4-carbine-556-prem-classic-ar15-upper-assembly-no-bcg-ch.html
    • Exactly all the points cited. Unfortunately, all of this sounds like "common sense" to people who don't know anything about guns, gun laws, or home protection. It is similar to telling people to keep their fire extinguishers in a locked safe at all times. Would that make sense? Absolutely not! Allowing a minor to access a loaded gun is already a crime! The cost of safes is not a minor point at all. Any additional cost that could lead to making guns prohibitively expensive is a win in these politicians' books. In NYC, if I remember correctly, not locking your guns correctly can carry a jail sentence of 30 days. Meanwhile I've seen people let out of central booking with essentially a "stay out of trouble" for carrying guns illegally. I remember once some family members were attacked in NY and called the police. The police told them it's a good thing they didn't fight back or they'd get arrested too! That is exactly what would happen here. The DA would say, "Well, you had all the time in the world to unlock your gun and your ammo, so your life was NOT in danger." On the chance that you do survive a violent home invasion. Oh it make me sick to my stomach.  
    • My best shooting Garand is a FG with a VAR barrel.
    • Frankly, the DELAY that all of these new roadblocks would cause if someone was smashing through your front door is the most egregious part of this. As @45Doll alluded, it's like they actually WANT to protect the criminals breaking into people's homes even if it means that the innocent home owners die as a result (as they're scrambling to try to protect themselves and their families). That's just sick. And I say that with no hyperbole. These folks aren't proposing this bill out of ignorance. They're not doing it because they don't understand, for instance, how home invasions happen in only seconds. I used to think it was ignorance - I afforded them the benefit of the doubt. But, after years of watching stupid bill after stupid bill - all targeting the law-abiding gun owner and never targeting the criminals - I've regrettably come to the conclusion that they propose these things because they hate gun owners and what they represent, plain and simple.  So, in light of that, I hesitate to focus on this next admittedly more minor point... but I didn't see it mentioned in the ANJRPC write-ups, so I'll throw it out there. The bill is talking about "firearms" in general, so both handguns and long guns. Well, how many people can afford locked gun safes/containers that are sized for long guns?  That's why many people avail themselves of various types of locking devices - like cable locks, trigger locks and similar (including those wall-mounted locks that clamp around the trigger). Well, I'm pretty sure those would not qualify as a "safe" or a "container" which is the wording specified in the bill. So, therefore, this bill also seems to eradicate entire classes of locking devices, doesn't it? The most affordable types, too! It seems like it's clearly discriminating against a gun owner of lesser economic means. Yet another aspect of this bill that seems ridiculously punitive towards the law-abiding gun owner.  These people have lost their minds. There needs to be another lawsuit obviously.
×
×
  • Create New...