Jump to content
sroc112

Is this upper NJ compliant?

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, sroc112 said:

Yup i did eye the colt uppers on brownells but looks like all the front sight posts have the bayonet lug. Trying to avoid the hassle of somehow removing the lug.

The bayo lug is the easiest part to remove - I've dremeled one off and ground down the surface, then hit it with a blue pen to protect the bare metal.

 

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RUTGERS95 said:

not a single documented instance of commission of a crime using it pre or post law.  This law and the stock pin screams jury nullification

It’s a stupid law that makes absolutely ZERO sense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Displaced Texan said:

It’s a stupid law that makes absolutely ZERO sense. 

agree!  if i were on a jury for this I would say it's a law akin to black only water fountains whereas it's an immoral, wrong, and undue burden on the liberties of man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally seperate question since we are on the topic of legality: and my apologies, as mentioned i have been out of the loop a while. Off the forum and not in the market for new guns over the last couple years. 

Regarding magazine - is it legal to own the hex mag ar magazines that are a 10 round capacity in a 30 round shell? Since they come directly from the manufacturer structured to accept only 10 rounds? I know wording in current ban states it must be permanent and a pin is not acceptable. Not exactly sure how hexmag restricts them to 10 max.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, sroc112 said:

Totally seperate question since we are on the topic of legality: and my apologies, as mentioned i have been out of the loop a while. Off the forum and not in the market for new guns over the last couple years. 

Regarding magazine - is it legal to own the hex mag ar magazines that are a 10 round capacity in a 30 round shell? Since they come directly from the manufacturer structured to accept only 10 rounds? I know wording in current ban states it must be permanent and a pin is not acceptable. Not exactly sure how hexmag restricts them to 10 max.

Totally legal!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I don’t know what you mean either. As long as the mag does not hold more than 10 rounds, it doesn’t matter what the mag body is…it could be a drum. As long as it doesn’t hold more than 10. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sroc112 said:

Thats why i qiestioned if they were legal under current ban. Since the wording essebtially states permanent and not temporary, pin not being acceptable. 

Take the 10 round limiter out and see how well that hexmag feeds without it and youll see why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, sroc112 said:

Any insight on the quality of this barrel? Looks like the use an FN in this set up.

 

https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-16-chf-1-7-m4-carbine-556-prem-classic-ar15-upper-assembly-no-bcg-ch.html

FN make great barrels.  A lot of people get hung up on CFH vs Button Cut as there are advantages to both.  I'm not a psa fan as many know so I'd look at Aero for the same set up but should be fine, just make sure the front site post is aligned as psa is notoriously known for this being an issue. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, sroc112 said:

Any insight on the quality of this barrel? Looks like the use an FN in this set up.

 

https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-16-chf-1-7-m4-carbine-556-prem-classic-ar15-upper-assembly-no-bcg-ch.html

That would be a great price if it came with a CH/BCG. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sroc113, I have a buddy that is an FFL and he ordered this for me a month ago from PSA....https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-16-mid-length-5-56-nato-1-7-nitride-13-5-lightweight-m-lok-moe-ept-rifle-w-mbus-sight-set.html  He pinned and welded a muzzle brake, and pinned the stock and now NJ compliant.  Ran 100 rounds through it and so far no issues.  Just have it shipped to an FFL that can make it NJ compliant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...