Jump to content
DirtyDigz

Co-witness iron sight "windage" to red dot?

Recommended Posts

I put a red dot optic on a G19 with stock sights, took it to the range and then "zeroed" the red dot and was getting hits very close to point of aim.

I then bought some "suppressor height" iron sights and put them on.  Haven't been back to the range yet.

Right now, when I line up the irons, the "previously zeroed" red dot is off to the right per image below (red circle is approximate position of the red dot):

image.thumb.png.7c61e9a9d33bf77c089d58695561f677.png
 

Which way should I drift the rear sight, left or right, to bring the irons in alignment with the red dot?

My brain just won't work right when I'm trying to think this through.  I'm thinking the red dot is to the RIGHT of the current irons alignment, so I need to drift the rear iron LEFT, but the more I think about it the more confused I'm making myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not do that.

Your irons and your dot may not cowitness. That’s OK!

Go to the range. Leave the dot off and shoot the irons. If necessary, make windage adjustments until you are happy with the results.


Then turn the dot on and shoot the dot. If necessary, make appropriate adjustments until you are happy with the results. Then leave it alone!

Don’t move stuff without verifying it has to move.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

• Machining on the housing of the dot could be off

• Placement of mounting holes in the slide or on the dot could be machined incorrectly 

• Alignment of the glass in the housing could be off

•  Machining of the mounting pocket in the slide could be off

• Bosses/lugs could be off

• Front sight placement hole could be off

• You could have an undiagnosed eye issue

• Bad mounting plate (if you are using one)

Those are just a few. There are dozens of interfaces between the optic and the slide and the irons and the slide that could have variances near the extreme end of acceptable tolerances, or even outside accepted tolerances. Combine a couple of those inconsistencies and when the errors are stacked, weird shit happens!

I have some dot guns that are right on, the dot sits precisely at the tip of the iron sight. Others are higher or lower, left or right.

Now, this will really make your head hurt - you may have different zeros now, but that may change over time. In a year, as your ability with the dot gets better, you may even see your zero change to be closer to irons, as you are not having to dial in corrective windage or elevation changes to compensate for other deficiencies.

In the end, all that matters is: You hit what you are aiming at right now.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, High Exposure said:

• Machining on the housing of the dot could be off

• Placement of mounting holes in the slide or on the dot could be machined incorrectly 

• Alignment of the glass in the housing could be off

•  Machining of the mounting pocket in the slide could be off

• Bosses/lugs could be off

• Front sight placement hole could be off

• You could have an undiagnosed eye issue

• Bad mounting plate (if you are using one)

Those are just a few. There are dozens of interfaces between the optic and the slide and the irons and the slide that could have variances near the extreme end of acceptable tolerances, or even outside accepted tolerances. Combine a couple of those inconsistencies and when the errors are stacked, weird shit happens!

I have some dot guns that are right on, the dot sits precisely at the tip of the iron sight. Others are higher or lower, left or right.

Now, this will really make your head hurt - you may have different zeros now, but that may change over time. In a year, as your ability with the dot gets better, you may even see your zero change to be closer to irons, as you are not having to dial in corrective windage or elevation changes to compensate for other deficiencies.

In the end, all that matters is: You hit what you are aiming at right now.

 

One more thing...that "zero parallax" optic...isn't. 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will also say this - unless you are a solid 300 5X B8 shooter at 25 yards, don’t zero at the 25. It is an exercise in frustration.

Zero at the 10 (there is less than an inch difference vertically between a 10 and 25 yard zero). You will save time, ammo and frustration by going to the ten, and getting the best zero you can. If you’re shooting well, back up in 5 yards increments and adjust windage. 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, High Exposure said:

I will also say this - unless you are a solid 300 5X B8 shooter at 25 yards, don’t zero at the 25. It is an exercise in frustration.

Zero at the 10 (there is less than an inch difference vertically between a 10 and 25 yard zero). You will save time, ammo and frustration by going to the ten, and getting the best zero you can. If you’re shooting well, back up in 5 yards increments and adjust windage. 

Yup, going to use the "25 zero at 10 yards" target recommended in the videos you linked:

 

KC Pistol_Rifle 10yd Zero Target (1.5 Mount) V2.pdf

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you are a 1” group at 25 yard shooter, that target is just going to get you chasing your zero all day long with no confidence in it when you run out of ammo.

Use a standard B8 (download and print them out) and keep them all in the 10 ring at 10 yards (all in the X if your feeling froggy) and that is sufficient. Then walk back and confirm. I like to confirm at 15, 20 and 25yards.

If they are all in the black, and evenly distributed, at 25 I’m happy. I may make a windage adjustment during confirmation if I see I am favoring left or right of center.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...