Supreme Court poised to drop another bombshell ruling after Roe v Wade

[Downtownv 1,774]

Supreme Court poised to drop another bombshell ruling after Roe v Wade

June 28, 2022 | Terresa Monroe-Hamilton | Print Article

Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Gab

 

It seems overturning Roe v. Wade may not be the biggest decision to come down from the Supreme Court as its ruling on West Virginia v. the Environmental Protection Agency could strip the government and alphabet agencies of their unfettered powers.

The case asks whether pressing policies that have an impact on the lives of all Americans should be made by unelected bureaucrats or by Congress. The ruling could decide that governing by executive agency fiat is unconstitutional, according to Fox News.

The case takes direct aim at President Biden’s climate agenda and involves the Clean Power Plan. That plan was put in place under former President Barack Obama in his efforts to combat climate change. If the plan had been implemented it would have cost roughly $33 billion per year and reordered the nation’s power grid. Two coal companies and the state of West Virginia sued the EPA alleging the plan was an abuse of power.

 

more here:

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/06/28/supreme-court-poised-to-drop-another-bombshell-ruling-after-roe-v-wade-1255492/?utm_campaign=bizpac&utm_content=Newsletter&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_source=Get Response&utm_term=EMAIL

 

This would strip the alphabet depts of making rules laws w/o congress ie the ATF, FBI and DHS.

[JackDaWack 2,895]

I saw this earlier, and I wondered if the ATF has been holding off on the new rules specifically because of this case. 

 

[Krdshrk 3,877]

This would be a wonderful thing - Basically - disband the ATF and all the other alphabet boys!

[diamondd817 826]

Would this stop NJ bureaucrats (shitbags) from writing administrative code?

[Displaced Texan 11,731]

It won’t disband them, but it WILL put a kibosh on their power to make shit up as they go along. 
 

This will probably be THE most impactful decision of our lifetimes. 

[Scorpio64 5,147]

1 hour ago, Krdshrk said:

Basically - disband the ATF

It's doubtful BATFE will be disbanded.  They do some legitimate work in R&D and are the best agency in the world when it comes to investigating firearms crimes and explosions.  It should be an apolitical organization with no regulatory power.

Actually, the F&E should be divested from the rest of the vice tax units.  Firearms have noting to do with taxes, alcohol or tobacco.  Guns are not a vice, they are a right.

[JackDaWack 2,895]

3 hours ago, Krdshrk said:

This would be a wonderful thing - Basically - disband the ATF and all the other alphabet boys!

Disband is a bit much, but it would stop them from rewriting the statutes however they like. 

[H2oVento 64]

12 hours ago, Scorpio64 said:

It's doubtful BATFE will be disbanded.  They do some legitimate work in R&D and are the best agency in the world when it comes to investigating firearms crimes and explosions.  It should be an apolitical organization with no regulatory power.

Actually, the F&E should be divested from the rest of the vice tax units.  Firearms have noting to do with taxes, alcohol or tobacco.  Guns are not a vice, they are a right.

"It should be an apolitical organization with no regulatory power."    That is spot on

[JackDaWack 2,895]

57 minutes ago, H2oVento said:

"It should be an apolitical organization with no regulatory power."    That is spot on

Well, the SCOTUS turned away the bumpstock Ban.... maybe this is why.  Not that it would help NJ or Maryland.

[EdF 323]

16 hours ago, Krdshrk said:

This would be a wonderful thing - Basically - disband the ATF and all the other alphabet boys!

The point isn't to disband them but to limit them to the letter of the law.  

Few realize that law passed by congress often contain language like, "the Secretary of Health and Human Services will determine . . . "  This passes the implementation and details of a bill off to an appointed department head who then passes the decision on to career bureaucrats.  Often, these bureaucrats do not even have the same goals as congress intended.  Congress gets to skirt responsibility.  The hope is that the court will require congress to spend more time hammering out details.  

[CMJeepster 2,777]

On 6/28/2022 at 3:16 PM, Downtownv said:

Supreme Court poised to drop another bombshell ruling after Roe v Wade

June 28, 2022 | Terresa Monroe-Hamilton | Print Article

 

Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Gab

 

It seems overturning Roe v. Wade may not be the biggest decision to come down from the Supreme Court as its ruling on West Virginia v. the Environmental Protection Agency could strip the government and alphabet agencies of their unfettered powers.

The case asks whether pressing policies that have an impact on the lives of all Americans should be made by unelected bureaucrats or by Congress. The ruling could decide that governing by executive agency fiat is unconstitutional, according to Fox News.

The case takes direct aim at President Biden’s climate agenda and involves the Clean Power Plan. That plan was put in place under former President Barack Obama in his efforts to combat climate change. If the plan had been implemented it would have cost roughly $33 billion per year and reordered the nation’s power grid. Two coal companies and the state of West Virginia sued the EPA alleging the plan was an abuse of power.

 

more here:

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2022/06/28/supreme-court-poised-to-drop-another-bombshell-ruling-after-roe-v-wade-1255492/?utm_campaign=bizpac&utm_content=Newsletter&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_source=Get Response&utm_term=EMAIL

 

This would strip the alphabet depts of making rules laws w/o congress ie the ATF, FBI and DHS.

Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissions (yahoo.com)

[JackDaWack 2,895]

15 minutes ago, CMJeepster said:

Supreme Court limits EPA in curbing power plant emissions (yahoo.com)

I'm gonna wait for a more formative write up, but it seems the opinion is incredibly narrow in scope to administrative rules. 

[CMJeepster 2,777]

2 minutes ago, JackDaWack said:

I'm gonna wait for a more formative write up, but it seems the opinion is incredibly narrow in scope to administrative rules. 

Yeah, I wasn't expecting much from it.

[Displaced Texan 11,731]

Unfortunately SCOTUS ruled that the Biden admin can end the Trump ‘remain in Mexico’ policy. 
 

This is bad. 

[Downtownv 1,774]

On 6/30/2022 at 11:07 AM, Displaced Texan said:

Unfortunately SCOTUS ruled that the Biden admin can end the Trump ‘remain in Mexico’ policy. 
 

This is bad. 

They Shit the Bed on that one.