Jump to content
M1152

Oregon sheriffs won't enforce new gun law

Recommended Posts

this should be interesting:

Oregon sheriffs won't enforce new gun law: ‘Infringes on Second Amendment’

'There’s just no way possible for us to enforce that and nor would I simply because it's an infringement on our Second Amendment,' says sheriff

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oregon-sheriffs-enforce-new-gun-law-infringes-second-amendment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that didn’t take long.  Moments ago, a judge in Oregon blocked enforcement of Oregon’s Ballot Measure 114.  Judge Richard Raschio placed a temporary restraining order on the law which would have taken effect Thursday, December 8th.  Guns Owners of America and the GOA Foundation are the organizations behind this along with Gliff Asmussen and Joseph Arnold.

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-court-blocks-oregons-ballot-measure-114/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good. This needs to be struck down. As does NY/NJ’s draconian gun laws. 
 

Keep donating to GOA and the other organizations that are fighting for all of us. Keep calling, emailing, and writing your reps to express your displeasure. 
Keep assembling peacefully at state houses, and showing ‘them’ we won’t tolerate violations to our constitutional RIGHTS! 
 

I know that we all work for a living, and it’s difficult to get involved, but we all must make the effort in some way. 
Every effort to oppose this tyranny helps. NEVER QUIT FIGHTING. The stakes to our freedoms are too great. 

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the article:

“Magazine capacity restrictions and permitting requirements have a proven track record: they save lives!" Rosenblum said in a statement. "We are confident the Oregon Constitution — like the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution — allows these reasonable regulations."
 

Prove it. The data from the Clinton AWB showed  it didn’t make any difference. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Displaced Texan said:

Prove it. The data from the Clinton AWB showed  it didn’t make any difference. 

But feelings, bro!

What "they" ignore is that the majority of "firearms violence" is committed with handguns by a certain demographic of urban residents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, CMJeepster said:

From the article:

"Sadly, these state gun laws, and whichever law the federal government tries to pass, will only make potential criminals out of otherwise law-abiding gun owners, ensuring that those with no respect for the law are the only ones with access to firearms."

Is it possible that they are trying to make the law so ridiculous that it deserves no respect?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Mr.Stu said:

Is it possible that they are trying to make the law so ridiculous that it deserves no respect?

"They" don't know what they're doing.  "They" are just pandering to their donors, like Bloomberg, to get the scary inanimate objects out of the hands of law-abiding citizens.  "They" don't want to admit to the fact that the majority of "gun violence" is committed by a certain urban demographic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...