ny law

[revenger 473]

https://www.newsmax.com/us/supreme-court-new-york-gun-law/2023/01/11/id/1103951/

 

this has todays date on it.    can anyone explain this and what is going on.

[Mr.Stu 1,918]

NY passed the CCIA (Concealed Carry Improvement Act) which was challenged in Federal District Court in a case known as Antonyuk.

The District Court issued a TRO to block many parts of the CCIA.

NY appealed to the 2nd Circuit to put a stay on the TRO and the 2nd Circuit granted the stay. That effectively put the CCIA back into full effect.

The Antonyuk legal team submitted an emergency request to SCOTUS to vacate the stay on the TRO which would have restored the TRO to block parts of the CCIA.

SCOTUS today issued an opinion that they don't want to vacate the stay, so the CCIA is still in full effect.

[revenger 473]

so whats next ?    cause NJ will probably try same shit

[DirtyDigz 1,812]

2nd circuit is now “on notice” from SCOTUS that SCOTUS is watching, so 2nd circuit better start moving quickly on adjudicating the appeal instead of just sitting on it.

NJ’s cases are in the 3rd circuit, different set for judges, no guarantee that an appeal by NJ would result in a stay for the current TRO, but it’s possible.

[ESB 247]

36 minutes ago, DirtyDigz said:

2nd circuit is now “on notice” from SCOTUS that SCOTUS is watching, so 2nd circuit better start moving quickly on adjudicating the appeal instead of just sitting on it.

I thought the same until they refused to Vacate the Stay on the TRO.  Vacating the Stay would have put the 2nd Circuit on notice, but SCOTUS did not do that. 

[DirtyDigz 1,812]

37 minutes ago, ESB said:

I thought the same until they refused to Vacate the Stay on the TRO.  Vacating the Stay would have put the 2nd Circuit on notice, but SCOTUS did not do that. 

SCOTUS did indeed put them “on notice” - if the 2nd cir doesn’t act in a “reasonable time”request intervention from us again: