Jump to content
Xtors

Biggest NJ gun ban ever: How was this missed?

Recommended Posts

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-new-jersey-has-enacted-the-largest-gun-ban-in-us-history/

Our friends at Ammoland, who are based in the gun rights hell that is New Jersey, have uncovered what appears to be a little-known aspect of a gun control law that passed and was signed into law last June. They’ve just published an article by attorney Evan Nappen who has read the law closely and discovered that — intentionally or not — it’s actually the biggest gun ban ever enacted in these here United States.

The bill was ostensibly intended to outlaw firearms without serial numbers. It outlawed homemade guns, 3D printed guns, even possession of the files for running a 3D printer or CNC machine for making firearms. It even outlawed slingshots, fer Chrissakes.

And like so many laws that are enacted at all levels of government, this one was poorly written. And as a result, it’s incredibly broad.

I talked to Mr. Nappen this afternoon and he tells me the law is quite clear that for a firearm to be legal in New Jersey, it has to have a serial number and the serial number must have been imprinted by a federally licensed firearm manufacturer.

That means your Daisy BB gun — which under the state’s idiotic laws is considered a firearm — may have a serial number on it, but Daisy isn’t a federally licensed gun maker. As a result that Red Ryder in your kid’s closet now makes you a felon.

The implications, however, are far wider than that. Think of every pre-1968 firearm owned by New Jersey residents. The Garand that Gramps brought home from the war in Europe? Felony. The duck gun that your uncle bought in 1955 and left to you in his will…you’re now a felon.

Under the state’s God-awful gun laws, air guns, pellet guns, CO2 guns, muzzleloaders and black powder guns are all considered firearms. If they don’t have serial numbers that were imprinted by a federally licensed gun maker, they’re illegal. Technically that Canik TP9 that’s made in a factory in Turkey…but now one that’s federally licensed by the US government…is also banned. Yeah.

More at link.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm not sure this was ever missed. as far as i've lived in this stupid state bb guns have been considered firearms. if you bought a nice gammo or daisy pellet gun from gander mountain back in the day you've been a felon for many years now. congrats for just realizing it...

just do a basic search of this forum and you'll see results talking about nj classifying pellet and bb guns as firearms as far back as 2009...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Indianajonze said:

i'm not sure this was ever missed. as far as i've lived in this stupid state bb guns have been considered firearms. if you bought a nice gammo or daisy pellet gun from gander mountain back in the day you've been a felon for many years now. congrats for just realizing it...

just do a basic search of this forum and you'll see results talking about nj classifying pellet and bb guns as firearms as far back as 2009...

That’s true, but even with that idiotic rule one could possess a BB gun if you had a FPID.  Now, since the BB gun does not have a serial number printed by a “firearms manufacturer” possession of one is a felony.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't about a bb gun being a firearm.  That was one example but not the point.  The point is that half the guns owned in NJ are illegal now because every firearm manufactured before 1968 did not have a serial number.  Guns last a long time.  Lots and lots of pre '68 guns around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, maintenanceguy said:

because every firearm manufactured before 1968 did not have a serial number. 

Not entirely true.  They weren’t required to have a serial number, but many, perhaps most, did.  

And it’s a rare military arm that wasn’t serialized by 1900 or so. 

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My interpretation for pre-1968 firearms is that It's not that they don't have a serial number; it's that they don't have a serial number issued by a federal firearms licensee, which didn't exist prior to 1968.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im guessing the answer to this may be "no," but i will ask it anyway....

Would firearms importers like Century arms international qualify as federally licensed if the firearm has a "foreign" serial number, but has a "Century Arms" stamp on it meaning it was available/processed through them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, father-of-three said:

Would firearms importers like Century arms international qualify as federally licensed if the firearm has a "foreign" serial number, but has a "Century Arms" stamp on it meaning it was available/processed through them?

No, not according to the article. the serial number must be registered with a federally licensed manufacturer. (Not importer)  - "This would include most modern imported rifles, shotguns, pistols, and revolvers, plus foreign firearms, and military surplus firearms from countries around the world, if these companies were not federally licensed manufacturers (e.g., Lugers, P-38s, Mausers, Arisakas, Enfields, SKSs, Carcanos, Webleys, Norincos, Mosins, etc.)."    See full article on Ammoland here https://www.ammoland.com/2023/05/new-jersey-politicians-enact-largest-gun-ban-us-history/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't missed, IMO.  Many were aware of this as soon as the "ghost gun" law passed.

AFAIK NJ hasn't been prioritizing prosecuting "improperly serialed" firearms outside of ghost guns and I haven't heard of anyone outside of a "ghost gun" maker being prosecuted for it.

I don't expect this to be law for much longer (say 2-3 years), because the "ghost gun" law is going to be challenged once some of the lower hanging fruit (AWB/Mag limits) litigation is resolved.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, DirtyDigz said:

I don't expect this to be law for much longer (say 2-3 years), because the "ghost gun" law is going to be challenged once some of the lower hanging fruit (AWB/Mag limits) litigation is resolved.

yes some time around the turn of the next century the way things have been going. everyone in this forum will be dead and buried when this one is resolved

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://gun.lawyer/episode-135-largest-gun-ban-in-usa/

So, this law, this absurd law, is turning uncountable numbers of New Jersey citizens, honest law-abiding citizens into potential felons. Facing New Jersey’s typical draconian and outrageous penalties for technical violations of the law, as New Jersey is famous for. Think about how many guns here are covered. It is the largest gun ban that I am aware of in United States history if you think of how many guns come under this law. As we speak, this law is on the books. If you want to read the actual law, I’ll give you the statute. It’s N.J.S. 2C:39-3 subsection n. That’s on the possession prohibitions. N.J.S. 2C:39-9 k., which are the other prohibitions that are at a second- degree level, even more severe. You can see in the 39-9 law, that’s where you’ll also find all the other “Ghosts Gun” prohibitions and 3d printer and all that kind of stuff, all thrown in there.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/25/2023 at 9:07 PM, almiz111 said:

So NJ gun shops have and have had  a bunch of inventory on the shelf that is illegal?   

Sounds like it.

Any shop with a Mosin or similar older used guns are at risk...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, DirtyDigz said:

I'm curious why Nappen is choosing this moment to blow this up.

This has been law for >4 years now.  I'm guessing it's either part of some strategy for a new suit, or he's trying to drum up business and attention.

"We" (the forum) previously discussed this 3 years ago here:
 

 

He’s down from New Hampshire on his book signing tour? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a start to have the current list of manufacturers, but what if the manufacturer went out of business and is no longer licensed?  But was licensed in the year YOUR gun was manufactured?  How will we confirm that? I'd hate to get rid of some older shotguns and rifles just because we cannot confirm they had a licenese in 1968, or 70, or 80?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, JerseyMak said:

It is a start to have the current list of manufacturers, but what if the manufacturer went out of business and is no longer licensed?  But was licensed in the year YOUR gun was manufactured?  How will we confirm that? I'd hate to get rid of some older shotguns and rifles just because we cannot confirm they had a licenese in 1968, or 70, or 80?

 

"They" don't care because "they" don't want us to have firearms.  Look at the shit legislation that's currently being tried in court.  "They" throw shit against the wall hoping that it will stick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/29/2023 at 8:23 AM, Xtors said:

https://gun.lawyer/episode-135-largest-gun-ban-in-usa/

So, this law, this absurd law, is turning uncountable numbers of New Jersey citizens, honest law-abiding citizens into potential felons....

Isn't that the entire rationale for PRNJ state government? While I do find this somewhat concerning, it also seems like the probabiliity for an ultimately favorable ruling in the post-Bruen court system is overwhelming. How many firearms had serial numbers in 1789 nor 1791?

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • In a ruling that had both proponents and opponents of the Second Amendment do a curious double take, a federal judge has ruled that an illegal immigrant was wrongly banned from possessing firearms. U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman ruled on March 8 that the defendant, Heriberto Carbajal-Flores, who is residing in the United States illegally, had his Second Amendment right’s violated when prosecutors originally charged him with 18 U.S.C § 922, which bars illegal immigrants from carrying guns or ammunition. “The noncitizen possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5), violates the Second Amendment as applied to Carbajal-Flores,” Judge Coleman wrote in her ruling. “Thus, the court grants Carbajal-Flores’ motion to dismiss.” The defense team for Mr. Carbajal-Flores had argued in their recent motion that the government could not show the law referenced was “part of the historical tradition that delimits the outer bounds of the right to keep and bear arms.” In 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that the government must show that each regulation “is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” The precise wording of the high court’s decision was enough for the defense to argue successfully in favor of dismissal. “Lifetime disarmament of an individual based on alienage or nationality alone does not have roots in the history and tradition of the United States,” Mr. Carbajal-Flores’ lawyers said. “The government argues that Carbajal-Flores is a noncitizen who is unlawfully present in this country. The court notes, however, that Carbajal-Flores has never been convicted of a felony, a violent crime, or a crime involving the use of a weapon. Even in the present case, Carbajal-Flores contends that he received and used the handgun solely for self-protection and protection of property during a time of documented civil unrest in the Spring of 2020,” Judge Coleman wrote. The ruling has promoted a large range of reactions across the legal and Second Amendment community. Writing on The Reload, attorney Matthew Larosiere agreed with the decision saying that even those in the country illegally are part of “the people” the Framer’s mention in the Second Amendment. “To find that illegal immigrants are outside of ‘the people’ protected by the Second Amendment, you must believe that the Framers were talking about a different ‘people’ in the First, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments,” he wrote. What Say You.....
    • Get rid of 'em all!
    • They get by with a little help from their friends. Like five years of increase. Here are the Republicans that voted to raise New Jersey's gas tax (nj1015.com)
    • So...  1) The CNJFO didn't exist back then. IT is currently operated by people who were just as angered by the dysfunctional spate of 2a advocacy groups NJ has been saddled with since the 91 AWB. There existence seems to have ushered in cooperation and coordination at both the state level and with national entities.  2) The ANJRPC isn't the turd of an organization it used to be. It genuinely seemed to exist solely to waste everyone's time while the NRA mothership used us to drive fundraising elsewhere. It seems to have moved away from that.  Currently I give to those two groups locally, and to FPC, GOA, and SAF nationally. Although I have to say that SAF is on the bubble. They do good work, but are way too comfortable chipping away slowly at things on a single front.  Basically I set aside the price of a case of ammo each year. Around Christmas they each get $25. Then hand out the rest of the funds as I see things I want to back and or fight. 
    • Unless I'm reading things wrong, I believe we can carry almost anywhere.  I think our glass is more than half full. 
×
×
  • Create New...