Jump to content
GrumpyOldRetiree

Carrying on trains, busses and in transit terminals

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, CMJeepster said:

Yes, thanks. Maybe I'm being a little stunad, but could you point me to the part that answers my question? I can see the terminals being off-limits IF they are considered "transportation hubs", but I don't see anything that addresses trains & busses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GRIZ said:

I think any station might be considered a transportation hub.

Once again the vagueness of NJ law.

During the oral argument for the PI this topic came up. The State's side said in their view a transportation hub is where 2 or more modes of public transport come together. E.g. Penn Station would be a hub because bus and rail are both present. They explicitly stated just a bus stop is not a hub. However, if you rode the bus into Newark Penn Station while carrying, you would be in violation of the law as you entered Penn Station. You would be OK along the route up to that point.

It is beyond dumb. They are just trying it on in as many places as possible to make carrying as hard as possible because they are control freaks.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Mr.Stu said:

However, if you rode the bus into Newark Penn Station while carrying, you would be in violation of the law as you entered Penn Station. You would be OK along the route up to that point.

Maybe they will make a new rule that the bus can stop before it enters the hub and all those that carry can get off to stay legal :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bklynracer said:

Maybe they will make a new rule that the bus can stop before it enters the hub and all those that carry can get off to stay legal :)

 

I am sure they will go out of their way to make our lives easier!:unsure:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a very evil man, nothing short of him vanishing the earth would be good enough. He destroyed many lives from Nursing home deaths to killing small businesses that invested their life savings into their businesses.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/30/2023 at 1:00 PM, GrumpyOldRetiree said:

Yes, thanks. Maybe I'm being a little stunad, but could you point me to the part that answers my question? I can see the terminals being off-limits IF they are considered "transportation hubs", but I don't see anything that addresses trains & busses.

 

On 5/30/2023 at 1:48 PM, GRIZ said:

I think any station might be considered a transportation hub.

Once again the vagueness of NJ law.

what he said. think about it. you're standing at the lindenwold speedline station. that technically speaking is a transportation hub.. same would go for greyhound bus stations, or any other station where people are congregating for travel to another destination.

On 5/31/2023 at 6:58 AM, GrumpyOldRetiree said:

Hey, not fair! You're supposed to show him with his new "I'm gonna run for president" hair style.

i wouldn't have voted for christie when he ran before...unless forced to. and i kinda sorta liked the guy. if it came down to being between this douchecanoe or christie? christie gets the vote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/30/2023 at 3:01 PM, Mr.Stu said:

During the oral argument for the PI this topic came up. The State's side said in their view a transportation hub is where 2 or more modes of public transport come together. E.g. Penn Station would be a hub because bus and rail are both present. They explicitly stated just a bus stop is not a hub. However, if you rode the bus into Newark Penn Station while carrying, you would be in violation of the law as you entered Penn Station. You would be OK along the route up to that point.

It is beyond dumb. They are just trying it on in as many places as possible to make carrying as hard as possible because they are control freaks.

Transportation hub is not codified in NJ law.  Stretching the State's definition a small train station could be termed a "Transportation Hub" if a bus stops there.

Your post shows how the current administration just wants to make the law up as they go along.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Downtownv said:

You may not like the answers..... Searched "What is the legal definition of a transportation Hub?"

Yes I read some of those definitions.  

To my experience, if something isn't defined under state law, a judge might go to federal law for a definition.  A liberal judge might define a parking lot as a transportation hub.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...