Jump to content
joejaxx

SAF v NJ (MULLER et al v. MAENZA et al)

Recommended Posts

who the hell is solicitor general?

 

The attorney who goes before SCOTUS to represent the Government. 

 

On a side note, Paul Clement, the attorney who won Peruta was a former solicitor general who has appeared 70+ times before the Supreme Court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He does. He's not mayor anymore, back at the company running the board.

Bloomberg law has nothing to do with him or his ideas, it's a service they provide to gather law info, bills etc..

 

My point being, I can't imagine anyone being allowed to use his name for any product or service that isn't subject to his scruitiny or mindset or, otherwise, doesn't have his *spin* on it, whether he actually  runs it or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My point being, I can't imagine anyone being allowed to use his name for any product or service that isn't subject to his scruitiny or mindset or, otherwise, doesn't have his *spin* on it, whether he actually  runs it or not.

 

Thats not really the case. Bloomberg news for example publishes lots of things Bloomberg himself might disagree with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They should change there name. I won't watch or support in anyway anything that uses the bloomberg name even if he's not involved. That name is poison to me and my family.

. I assume you don't own any stocks then? Because most places probably get a feed from bloomberg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love it:  "But just as the struggle for racial equality did not end with Brown v. Board of Education,11 the effort to establish the Second Amendment as a normal part of the Bill of Rights was never going to unfurl a “Mission Accomplished” banner just because the Supreme Court declared that the Second Amendment was a fundamental individual right on par with the others."

 

Don't forget to also read this one:  http://harvardlawreview.org/2014/04/good-cause-requirements-for-carrying-guns-in-public/  "If a public-carry licensing regime operates like a ban, it should be evaluated as such."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...