Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2C:39-2. Presumptions

a. Possession of firearms, weapons, destructive devices, silencers, or explosives in a vehicle. When a firearm, weapon, destructive device, silencer, or explosive described in this chapter is found in a vehicle, it is presumed to be in the possession of the occupant if there is but one. If there is more than one occupant in the vehicle, it shall be presumed to be in the possession of all, except under the following circumstances:

 

(1) When it is found upon the person of one of the occupants, it shall be presumed to be in the possession of that occupant alone;

 

(2) When the vehicle is not a stolen one and the weapon or other instrument is found out of view in a glove compartment, trunk or other enclosed customary depository, it shall be presumed to be in the possession of the occupant or occupants who own or have authority to operate the vehicle; and

 

(3) When the vehicle is a taxicab and a weapon or other instrument is found in the passenger's portion of the vehicle, it shall be presumed to be in the possession of all the passengers, if there are any, and if not, in the possession of the driver.

 

http://www.state.nj.us/njsp/about/fire_ag2.html and follow the relevant links

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It works the same for drugs, if no one claims possession it is guilty by association. They add this BS so there is always someone or someone's to charge, they don't care who is right or who is wrong. One of my friends was a DD one night we went out to party, on her way home she was dropping friends off and got pulled over, she explained she was sober and the DD for the night, they didnt care, pulled her from the car and searched it for no reason, the passengers were intoxicated needless to say. Upon searching the car they found a bag of coke under the back seat, her friend had tried to hide it, no one claimed the coke and she was charge with possesion. They said anything in her car was her responsibility, even though she did not know about it. She took a drug test at the station and came up clean. Charges stood and she went on probation for a year. So i guess NJ expects you to either have stand up friends, or perform a strip search for each person getting into your car.

 

Even more so, if someone brings a firearm into your car with out your knowledge you could be charge with illegal possession and transport of a firearm. NJ law was made so they don't have to do any real police work, i'm sure many police officers out there would agree for better or worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading the above, I'd say that in the eyes of NJ statutes most of us are criminally liable...

It's illegal to even touch a spouse's firearm in one's own home...even if she/he is in the same room?!?

This is absolutely crazy.

 

Also, not true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No legal way to transfer it, no legal way to possess a firearm in NJ without transfer.

 

I wish I could find the Nappen editorial where he went over this - but I can't craft a search that doesn't get buried under Aitken results.

 

FWIW, if you're using google, just put -aitken

 

it will eliminate any result with aitken in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No legal way to transfer it, no legal way to possess a firearm in NJ without transfer.

 

I wish I could find the Nappen editorial where he went over this - but I can't craft a search that doesn't get buried under Aitken results.

You are referring to only the temporary transfer at specific locations other than what is exempted under the law.

 

NJS 2C:39-5b

Any person who knowingly has in his possession any handgun, including any antique handgun, without first having obtained a permit to carry the same as provided in N.J.S.2C:58-4, is guilty of a crime of the third degree if the handgun is in the nature of an air gun, spring gun or pistol or other weapon of a similar nature in which the propelling force is a spring, elastic band, carbon dioxide, compressed or other gas or vapor, air or compressed air, or is ignited by compressed air, and ejecting a bullet or missile smaller than three-eighths of an inch in diameter, with sufficient force to injure a person. Otherwise it is a crime of the second degree.

 

 

NJS 2C:39-6e

Nothing in subsections b., c. and d. of N.J.S.2C:39-5 shall be construed to prevent a person keeping or carrying about his place of business, residence, premises or other land owned or possessed by him, any firearm, or from carrying the same, in the manner specified in subsection g. of this section, from any place of purchase to his residence or place of business, between his dwelling and his place of business, between one place of business or residence and another when moving, or between his dwelling or place of business and place where such firearms are repaired, for the purpose of repair. For the purposes of this section, a place of business shall be deemed to be a fixed location.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was eliding. In this case, it wouldn't be the possession that was illegal per se (as you point out, it is an exemption to possess at home); it's the (temporary) transfer. I expect that this wouldn't come up much, due to not being under observation by a cop, but... I seriously wasn't expecting the judge to tell the jury to ignore the "moving" exemption prior to the Aitken case, either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FID doesn't help you if it's a handgun. And I doubt it will stop the arrest for a longarm. And even so, a motivated prosecutor could nail you for illegal transfer...

 

You're not required to have the pistol purchase permits with you. Even the FPID isn't a legal requirement. They're both purchase permits. Not ownership ones.

 

Think of a scenario where the cops will pull you over or talk to you at the range. They have no legal right to ask you to provide paperwork for owning the firearm as long as you are transporting and using the firearm within the exceptions laid out in the law.

 

In fact: what about people who own guns but do not have FPIDs or PPPs? Then what?

 

The cops will never know, and they probably won't give a damn as long as your in the exceptions zone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clearly the cops did give a damn for someone who was in an exception zone - see Brian Aitken. A cop who is feeling cranky will arrest and let the prosecutor settle the matter...

 

The reason I mentioned the FID is that the law forbids possession of a longarm unless the possessor has obtained a FID, except under the exemptions. So, yes, a FID is relevant to possession of a longarm.

 

"The New Jersey Supreme Court has a bias against guns and gun owners. In a famous decision they said, 'When it comes to firearms, the citizen acts at his own peril.'" Until that changes, assume the law is the enemy and plan accordingly...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said, I saw an editorial by Nappen where he mentioned a judge being prosecuted for illegal transfer in his living room...

 

Scott Bach editorial. If you search back to here http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/14723-using-someone-elses-gun-at-cherry-ridge-getting-it-there/page__view__findpost__p__197135 we've had a similar conversation before.

 

http://blog.nj.com/njv_scott_bach/2008/01/stop_on_your_way_to_target_pra.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...