Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
BlueLineFish

How to ship firearms

Recommended Posts

Must ship to an FFL via FedEx or UPS,

These carriers will require you to ship 2nd day air, and do so from a "hub"

I couldn't find a "Storefront"UPS and FedEx location that would accept a handgun.

Private individuals cannot ship handguns via USPS.

Honestly your best bet is have an FFL with whom you're friendly ship for you, even if they charge you a fee, it'll probably work out to be less than what you'll pay UPS/FedEx.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Must ship to an FFL via FedEx or UPS,

These carriers will require you to ship 2nd day air, and do so from a "hub"

I couldn't find a "Storefront"UPS and FedEx location that would accept a handgun.

Private individuals cannot ship handguns via USPS.

Honestly your best bet is have an FFL with whom you're friendly ship for you, even if they charge you a fee, it'll probably work out to be less than what you'll pay UPS/FedEx.

incorrect, fedex & ups will only ship next day on handguns, even though federal law says 2 days. depending where your shipping to & insurance coverage, average through those carriers will run you around $70 each

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

incorrect, fedex & ups will only ship next day on handguns, even though federal law says 2 days. depending where your shipping to & insurance coverage, average through those carriers will run you around $70 each

 

Cite please? I don't think there is any federal requirement, this is just the carrier's policy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why cant u sell them here?

 

Rule 4. No selling for anyone else. No listing weapons that your dad, brother, friend are trying to get rid of.

 

Of course, one could be circumventing this rule by posting twice that one can not sell for another., and by receiving and sending PMs to what one's friend is selling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not that...they really don't know the rules nor want to be bothered. It's not the three dollars. Plus who is going to buy from somebody whose first post is a classified and participates in nothing else. They are realists and not big into firearms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

incorrect, fedex & ups will only ship next day on handguns, even though federal law says 2 days. depending where your shipping to & insurance coverage, average through those carriers will run you around $70 each

 

That is if he is shipping them himself. My ffl only ships 2nd day and cost is about $15 because he has a fedex account..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a few problems with selling guns for someone else...

 

One, we don't want to encourage people to conduct illegal transfers by acting as a middleman for a deal.

 

Two, if someone doesn't wish to contribute to the forum, why should they get some benefit from it? There are plenty of forum FFLs who can legally broker deals that you can turn friends to.

 

Three, members don't want to get strung along by talking to multiple people while trying to buy something. It is a pain in the ass to make an offer to one person, and then wait while he/she brings that offer to the owner, gets an answer, and then provides that answer to the prospective buyer. The same issue crops up when asking questions about an item.

 

For these reasons, we have the rules that we do. For your specific situation, BLF, I would recommend forwarding your friends to any of our supporting FFLs in order to have them take the guns on consignment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Field strip guns. Ship serialized parts UPS. Declare them "machine parts" and ship whatever speed you like. Put remaining parts in USPS flat rate box for <$5. Ship away.

 

Which would be okay for everything but the frame. IIRC Federal law requires you to declare a firearm to a common carrier when shipping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you post a link to that federal law? I have never seen such a law and would not want to do something wrong.

 

18 U.S.C. 922(a)(2)(A), 922(a) (3), 922(a)(5) and 922(e), 27 CFR 478.31 and 478.30

 

And,

 

§ 478.31 Delivery by common or contract carrier.

(a) No person shall knowingly deliver or cause to be delivered to any common or contract carrier for transportation or shipment in interstate or foreign commerce to any person other than a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector, any package or other container in which there is any firearm or ammunition without written notice to the carrier that such firearm or ammunition is being transported or shipped.

 

And,

 

May a nonlicensee ship a firearm through the U.S. Postal Service?

A nonlicensee may not transfer a firearm to a nonlicensed resident of another State. A nonlicensee may

mail a shotgun or rifle to a resident of his or her own State or to a licensee in any State. The Postal Service recommends that long guns be sent by registered mail and that no marking of any kind which would indicate the nature of the contents be placed on the outside of any parcel containing firearms. Handguns are not mailable. A common or contract carrier must be used to ship a handgun.

[18 U.S.C. 1715, 922(a)(3), 922(a)(5) and 922 (a)(2)(A)]

 

And,

 

May a nonlicensee ship a firearm by common or contract carrier?

A nonlicensee may ship a firearm by a common or contract carrier to a resident of his or her own State or to a licensee in any State. A common or contract carrier must be used to ship a handgun. In addition, Federal law requires that the carrier be notified that the shipment contains a firearm and prohibits common or contract carriers from requiring or causing any label to be placed on any package indicating that it contains a firearm.

[18 U.S.C. 922(a)(2)(A), 922(a) (3), 922(a)(5) and 922(e), 27 CFR 478.31 and 478.30]

 

And,

 

May a nonlicensee ship firearms interstate for his or her use in hunting or other lawful activity?

Yes. A person may ship a firearm to himself or herself in care of another person in the State where he or she intends to hunt or engage in any other lawful activity. The package should be addressed to the owner. Persons other than the owner should not open the package and take possession of the firearm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...