Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A girl I work with has a brother who has his fid card. He recently applied for his first permit to purchase and the Bayonne police went to his neighbor's house and started asking questions about him (if he lived there etc...no mention of guns). He didn't put the neighbor down as a reference. Is this normal for bayonne pd?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think for my initial FID they did that but not since. Might be a one time thing when you first apply.

 

They contacted my neighbor a few times, but not every time.

Well maybe they should be educated on what the guidelines are, and what IS and IS NOT required and/or allowed..

 

everyone makes up their own little rules, it's all about job security my friend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just be aware that "THEY" are on this forum.

 

Welcome, boys!

 

If you guys will look around--especially at some of the stickies regarding ACTUAL N.J. firearms laws, you'll have a frame of reference for how you're really supposed to handle the FID/P2P process.

 

Sincerely,

 

Scott ("the letter-writer") from Evergreen Street

 

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they merely doing the background investigation to verify that you live where you say you live--no mention of guns or anything of a personal/confidential nature.

Granted there are less intrusive and less costly ways to do this, but I do not see why it would not be allowed. It is not like they are asking you for additional references, or asking you extraneous questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its mostly for verification i believe. Why take someone on what they put down. People dont always live where they say they do. I have no issues with fact checking. When they came for me they made no mention of firearms. I spoke with the same people they did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Checking every so often seems fair. People may be hesitant to change their FID if they move because of how long ot could take.

 

checking for what?

 

does it really matter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

checking for what?

 

does it really matter?

 

Yeah, I don't get it. What's "fair" about it? It is unnecessary and not called for in any of the many onerous firearms ownership laws and regulations we already have to put up with in this state. Their time would be better spent expediting the existing process we have for FID/P2P, instead of wasting their time on fishing expeditions to people's homes, asking for two "neighborhood references" in addition to the two you have to provide with original application, and their insisting on mailing out a form letter to your employer, telling them that you have applied to purchase and own firearms.

 

Enough's enough, man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it took 2 weeks to get the address change then this wouldn't be a problem. When I moved in 08 it took 5 friggen months and they spent my first name wrong on the card. How can you spell R-A-Y-M-O-N-D wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back in the late 80's I lost my wallet in Jersey City. After replacing the DL, SS card, etc., I went down to police headquarters and told them I needed a replacement FID. The late Detective Joe Heaney brought me into BCI, took my prints, brought some paperwork to then-COP Tony Visone and sent me on my way with the duplicate card, which I still have to this day and which looks like my dog chewed on it. I don't care what it looks like as I am NEVER gonna put myself at the mercy of those guys down there nowadays. If all the information is the same, and all you would need to do is (possibly)) get new fingerprints, then why should it take any longer than it took Heaney to do it back in the day?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't get it. What's "fair" about it? It is unnecessary and not called for in any of the many onerous firearms ownership laws and regulations we already have to put up with in this state. Their time would be better spent expediting the existing process we have for FID/P2P, instead of wasting their time on fishing expeditions to people's homes, asking for two "neighborhood references" in addition to the two you have to provide with original application, and their insisting on mailing out a form letter to your employer, telling them that you have applied to purchase and own firearms.

 

Enough's enough, man.

I really do not have a problem with the PD verifying the information I put on the form--assuming the form is legit. That being said, I think the whole process is ridiculous and probably unconstitutional. I don't fault the LPD for due dilligence--now there are far easier ways to verify where I live, but maybe Bayonne PD rolls old school. Residence verification seems like a minor inconvenience compared to fingerprinting and notarized release forms.

 

I just received a "character" reference for a friend and they ask "what kind of person is he?" What the heck kind of question is that? I really did not know what they were looking for, so I just put "U.S. Citizen" but I have not verified that. Then they ask if he has ever committed or been convicted of a crime. How am I supposed to know that? This is the Police asking me, shouldn't they know if the guy is a criminal? I just put that I do not know for everything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...