Black Ops 1 Posted January 16, 2013 Apparently includes national 10 round magazine limit as well as AWB - http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/obama-guns-plan-to-include-trafficking-law-86260.html?hp=t1_3. Here come impeachment proceedings... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mattio41 0 Posted January 16, 2013 Shaking my head.... But you know, if we dont do something, then they will just ram it down our throats.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blake 50 Posted January 16, 2013 well if that's what the pres actually comes out with tom say goodbye to being able to find anything in stock for the foreseeable future. i really don't think they will get an awb or mag capacity law through congress but that won't stop ppl from buying everything they possibly can until his bill gets voted down. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blake 50 Posted January 16, 2013 Shaking my head.... But you know, if we dont do something, then they will just ram it down our throats.... also completely agree with letting the politicians know THIS IS NOT WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NicePants 58 Posted January 16, 2013 Apparently includes national 10 round magazine limit as well as AWB - http://www.politico....60.html?hp=t1_3. Here come impeachment proceedings... It'd be nice, but I doubt he'd get impeached over this. It'll be challenged no doubt, by states greater than the one we live in, but I have a feeling we're stuck with him for the long run. Best start to rev up that borscht, comrade! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
H.M. Murdock 0 Posted January 16, 2013 Interesting Curious about background check database and wording on anti-trafficking law I guess I'll find out when I wake up Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yukongt2000 3 Posted January 16, 2013 The NY guys are gonna really PANIC buy now! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EchoMirage 137 Posted January 16, 2013 Interesting Curious about background check database and wording on anti-trafficking law I guess I'll find out when I wake up i have a bad feeling the 'anti-trafficking' will be worded to ban simple transporting of guns from state to state, curtailing anyone moving to a free state that publicly denounces these anti-constitutional moves Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Ops 1 Posted January 16, 2013 This is it: http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/555653/white-house-gun-proposals.pdf Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Handyman 5,682 Posted January 16, 2013 Maybe we can get NICS checks taken out of NJ's hands and moved to the federal level. Cut out the middleman. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Ops 1 Posted January 16, 2013 Maybe we can get NICS checks taken out of NJ's hands and moved to the federal level. Cut out the middleman. Nice idea, but NJ state police enforce 30 day rule by overseeing the NICS checks. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jamesbod 0 Posted January 16, 2013 hey hey we still got our 15 rounds, right? sorry new yorkers. feel really sorry for the upstate families who were sold out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Metalflames 0 Posted January 16, 2013 As of today 15 rounds next week who knows. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DngrZne 0 Posted January 16, 2013 Screw 15, we should be pushing for 30+. 15 is already unconstitutional. Just because they are pushing for 10, or 7, or 5, doesn't mean we should accept any of them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jokerman 2 Posted January 16, 2013 Just one question: Precisely how would any of the things BHO proposed today have prevented the evil piece of dung who did the shooting in Ct. from doing it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueLineFish 615 Posted January 16, 2013 Just one question: Precisely how would any of the things BHO proposed today have prevented the evil piece of dung who did the shooting in Ct. from doing it?maybe this kid would have been instituionalized.that's a big maybe but most gun laws really don't solve the problem. What I would support is federal charges for individuals using ILLEGALLY obtained firearms in a crime with stiff federal penalties. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JacksonLee 4 Posted January 16, 2013 Just one question: Precisely how would any of the things BHO proposed today have prevented the evil piece of dung who did the shooting in Ct. from doing it? Of the executive actions? Exactly 0 of them would have prevented or lessened what happened. If congress passes the AWB and magazine capacity restriction like he wants, well then he would have had to used a AR15 without a flash suppressor and collapsible stock (assuming they don't ban the AR platform entirely, in which case he would have used one of the 2 handguns he also had), and would have to reloaded a few more times.... This all would have made the tragedy much less tragic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVisHome 0 Posted January 16, 2013 Just one question: Precisely how would any of the things BHO proposed today have prevented the evil piece of dung who did the shooting in Ct. from doing it? We all know the answer to that. Let's hope the anti's are satisfied and back off. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVisHome 0 Posted January 16, 2013 ... This all would have made the tragedy much less tragic. Is this genuine, or tongue in cheek? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JacksonLee 4 Posted January 16, 2013 Is this genuine, or tongue in cheek? Tongue firmly in cheek Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bob2222 316 Posted January 16, 2013 JIC Chris Christie wakes up some morning and decides on Presidential seppuku, I inventoried to make sure I had 10 round mags for everything. I would be more than annoyed if NJ followed in NY's path and I woke up some morning to find my 13 round mags would make me a felon in 30 days, but nobody had gotten around to manufacturing 7 round (or 2 round) mags yet. I wonder if the WH had a "heads up" about the Sandy Hook report and it places much of the responsibility on a massive failure of the Connecticut mental health laws. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jokerman 2 Posted January 16, 2013 One more question: Is it just me or is there, since about Day 3 after the shooting, an almost complete absence of any news or information about the shooter coming from the media? (I know, if it doesn't fit the narrative...which is guns, guns, guns...they don't have any interest in it.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Black Ops 1 Posted January 16, 2013 Of the executive actions? Exactly 0 of them would have prevented or lessened what happened. If congress passes the AWB and magazine capacity restriction like he wants, well then he would have had to used a AR15 without a flash suppressor and collapsible stock (assuming they don't ban the AR platform entirely, in which case he would have used one of the 2 handguns he also had), and would have to reloaded a few more times.... This all would have made the tragedy much less tragic. An evil nut can find a way to maximize mayhem - just use your imagination... throw gasoline bombs into classrooms and shoot anyone trying to escape with a 7 round handgun, for example Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueLineFish 615 Posted January 16, 2013 An evil nut can find a way to maximize mayhem - just use your imagination... throw gasoline bombs into classrooms and shoot anyone trying to escape with a 7 round handgun, for example or use commonly available items to blow up a federal building...oh wait..that already happened Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pizza Bob 1,488 Posted January 16, 2013 The NY guys are gonna really PANIC buy now! Too late Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Metalflames 0 Posted January 16, 2013 So when do the proposals go to the Senate? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EchoMirage 137 Posted January 16, 2013 One more question: Is it just me or is there, since about Day 3 after the shooting, an almost complete absence of any news or information about the shooter coming from the media? (I know, if it doesn't fit the narrative...which is guns, guns, guns...they don't have any interest in it.) youre not alone Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DirtyDigz 1,811 Posted January 16, 2013 youre not alone Also noticed this. I'm dying to know if the shooter's mother had the guns locked up or not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EchoMirage 137 Posted January 16, 2013 Also noticed this. I'm dying to know if the shooter's mother had the guns locked up or not. my theory....she had them firmly and securely locked in an appropriate safe. but, that will never see the light of day, because it goes against bHos agenda of painting every gun owner as simply leaving loaded ARs on the coffee table next to your potentially unstable son Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Metalflames 0 Posted January 16, 2013 my theory....she had them firmly and securely locked in an appropriate safe. but, that will never see the light of day, because it goes against bHos agenda of painting every gun owner as simply leaving loaded ARs on the coffee table next to your potentially unstable son +1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
