diamondd817 823 Posted January 18, 2013 From Right Denied to Shall Issue! There is hope people. Bill (HB01540 was introduced on 11- Jan – 2013 Synopsis As Introduced Creates the Family and Personal Protection Act. Provides that the Department of State Police shall issue a license to carry a loaded or unloaded handgun to an applicant that meets specified qualifications, has provided the application and specified documentation, and has submitted the requisite fees. Provides that a license to carry a handgun entitles a licensee to carry a loaded handgun, either concealed or openly, on or about his or her person or in a vehicle, except in certain prohibited locations. Provides that the license shall be issued by the Department of State Police within 45 days of receipt from a sheriff and shall be valid throughout the State for a period of 5 years from the date of issuance. Provides for renewal of licenses. Establishes qualifications for licensees, certified firearms instructors, and instructor trainers. Provides for home rule preemption. Provides that the provisions of the Act are severable. Amends the Freedom of Information Act. Prohibits from inspection and copying information about applications for licenses to carry a handgun and about license holders contained in the database created by the Family and Personal Protection Act, except as authorized by that Act. Amends the State Finance Act and the Criminal Code of 2012 to make conforming changes. Effective immediately. This Bill will also amend the following: 5ILCS 140/7.5 30 ILCS 105/5.826 (NEW) 720 ILCS 5/21-6 from Ch.38, par 21-6 720 ILCS 5/24-2 This was filed with the Clerk by Rep. David Reis Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wikkie2204 0 Posted January 18, 2013 From Right Denied to Shall Issue! There is hope people. Bill (HB01540 was introduced on 11- Jan – 2013 hall issue a license to carry a loaded or unloaded handgun to an applicant that meets specified qualifications, has provided the application and specified documentation, and has submitted the requisite fees. I hate to be THAT guy, but I wonder if they are going to adopt the "justifiable need" criteria. If not, go IL!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lunker 274 Posted January 18, 2013 Provide for home rule preemption. That is the sticking point. Illinois will become a patchwork quilt State where you can carry in some towns and cannot and many others. Obviously Chicago and almost all of Cook County will be a big no no. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RubberBullets 65 Posted January 18, 2013 Provide for home rule preemption. That is the sticking point. Illinois will become a patchwork quilt State where you can carry in some towns and cannot and many others. Obviously Chicago and almost all of Cook County will be a big no no. Then the gun owners of IL have every right to challenge the law stating it is still hamstringing the court's ruling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diamondd817 823 Posted January 18, 2013 All shall issue states have specified qualifications. You meet them, you get the permit. Not like the wishy washy may issue bs. Don't read too much into that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lunker 274 Posted January 18, 2013 Michigan is a shall issue State that also provides for local preemption, so there is a precedent. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mipafox 438 Posted January 18, 2013 All shall issue states have specified qualifications. You meet them, you get the permit. I would like clarification on what you mean by that. Because I think that is not true in most shall issue states. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crusher 0 Posted January 18, 2013 So tell me why the pro 2A politicians don't hold out and simply allow the court ordered time to run out and have constitutional carry. I know this would be a huge change for IL, but why give in now? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diamondd817 823 Posted January 18, 2013 I would like clarification on what you mean by that. Because I think that is not true in most shall issue states. LIke: 1. Can't be a felon or prohibited persons 2. Need to take a basic safety course (Florida CCW requirement) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mipafox 438 Posted January 19, 2013 <p> LIke: 1. Can't be a felon or prohibited persons 2. Need to take a basic safety course (Florida CCW requirement) 1 - Not really. You can't possess a firearm if you are a felon (I think there are exceptions) or prohibited so that is not really a specified qualification. 2 - No. Not all shall issue states require a course or any training at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diamondd817 823 Posted February 2, 2013 New shall issue CCW bill for IL = HB0097 Introduced 1/29/13 This bill also inlcudes universal reciprocity and allows non-residents to get a IL ccw. Preemption and OC protection is covered. The bill looks good. http://ilga.gov/legi...ecSess== Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrjam2jab 9 Posted February 6, 2013 I don't see "universal reciprocity". The Department shall enter into reciprocal agreements with any other state whose requirements to obtain a license or permit is substantially similar to those requirements contained in Section 85. With Section 85 being training: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Candide 0 Posted February 6, 2013 Thats all done within a year and yet we are working on fighting against them lowering mag capacity to 5? Good for them, pathetic for nj. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites