Sen. Frank Lautenberg D-N.J. introduced legislation Tuesday that would make it illegal to manufacture or sell a magazine that contains more than 10rds

[UnrestrictedEnthusiastInVA 0]

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) introduced legislation Tuesday that would make it illegal to manufacture or sell a magazine that contains more than 10 rounds.

 

 

Limits on high-capacity magazines have been frequently discussed in the wake of the Newtown, Conn., shooting, and limits on magazines was one of the proposals that President Barack Obama made last week.

 

 

The limit on magazines would renew an element of the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004. Since then, it has become legal to produce and sell high-capacity magazines. Support for renewing the assault weapons ban has received tepid response, even in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

 

 

Lautenberg’s bill has sixteen cosponsors in the Senate, all Democrats. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) has filed a companion bill in the House.

 

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2013/01/lautenberg-introduces-ammo-bill-154907.html

[NicePants 58]

Rev up those fingers guys, time to rapidfire mail every single person in the house and senate. Anybody know of a site or program that'll let me get every last one in one fell swoop?

[Underdog 1,593]

I think they should pass a law as to the term limits of the morbidly idiotic, self-serving, hypocritical and pathetic politicians that continue to infest our public buildings. I might trade magazine limits for term limits.

[CageFighter 236]

wait until Booker puts him into RETIREMENT!

[SJG 253]

Booker is anti-gun also. Need Republican Senator

[AS350Driver 56]

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) introduced legislation Tuesday that would make it illegal to manufacture or sell a magazine that contains more than 10 rounds.

 

Well, when they're manufactured and sold they contain zero rounds, so there's nothing to worry about.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jamesbod 0]

liberals were wrong.

conservatives don't want to cling to their guns.

they want to cling to their magazines

[Candide 0]

Does this guy do anything but introduce gun bill after gun bill? Cmon man. Do something else. How do these assclowns get reelected?

[johnp 45]

Booker is anti-gun also. Need Republican Senator

 

I agree a Republican senator might help our hobby, a little. Booker has made some comments that seem intelligent and not as much a gun grabber as the mummy.

[Silent Service 7]

This is juvenile, but I just gotta say it;

 

I'm gonna mail him a 30 page nudie magazine ripped down to 10 pages, that should make him slip on that bannana peel.

[SJG 253]

56. S.33 : A bill to prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] (introduced 1/22/2013) Cosponsors (16)

Committees: Senate Judiciary

Latest Major Action: 1/22/2013 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

57. S.34 : A bill to increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of firearms or the issuance of firearms and explosives licenses to known or suspected dangerous terrorists.

Sponsor: Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] (introduced 1/22/2013) Cosponsors (10)

Committees: Senate Judiciary

Latest Major Action: 1/22/2013 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

58. S.35 : A bill to require face to face purchases of ammunition, to require licensing of ammunition dealers, and to require reporting regarding bulk purchases of ammunition.

Sponsor: Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] (introduced 1/22/2013) Cosponsors (6)

Committees: Senate Judiciary

Latest Major Action: 1/22/2013 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

[NicePants 58]

56. S.33 : A bill to prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.

Sponsor: Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] (introduced 1/22/2013) Cosponsors (16)

Committees: Senate Judiciary

Latest Major Action: 1/22/2013 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

57. S.34 : A bill to increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of firearms or the issuance of firearms and explosives licenses to known or suspected dangerous terrorists.

Sponsor: Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] (introduced 1/22/2013) Cosponsors (10)

Committees: Senate Judiciary

Latest Major Action: 1/22/2013 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

58. S.35 : A bill to require face to face purchases of ammunition, to require licensing of ammunition dealers, and to require reporting regarding bulk purchases of ammunition.

Sponsor: Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. [NJ] (introduced 1/22/2013) Cosponsors (6)

Committees: Senate Judiciary

Latest Major Action: 1/22/2013 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

 

Oh boy! Get ready for those knocks on the door by the police when you buy two bricks of .22! Whoopee!

[Hooligan 0]

Why won't this fossil retire to a gun-free golf course somewhere and leave us alone?

[NJCK 5]

Why won't this fossil retire to a gun-free golf course somewhere and leave us alone?

 

He can't retire. There's no place that wants him... So he'll continue to haunt the Senate halls for all eternity apparantly...

[NicePants 58]

He can't retire. There's no place that wants him... So he'll continue to haunt the Senate halls for all eternity apparantly...

 

That's the one thing I fear. What if he's actually an immortal demon?

[Hooligan 0]

We thought it was just a harmless puzzle box...

 

"The box... you opened it. We came." - Sen. Lautenberg

[ruger9 0]

Does this guy do anything but introduce gun bill after gun bill? Cmon man. Do something else. How do these assclowns get reelected?

 

So-called "social programs"... when the tax CONSUMERS outnumber the tax PAYERS, it's over.

[Candide 0]

 

 

So-called "social programs"... when the tax CONSUMERS outnumber the tax PAYERS, it's over.

 

Ok, but thats not whats happening. The tax consumers are not outnumbering the tax payers.

 

That doesn't answer how he gets reelected time after time.

[bhunted 887]

There's a place for him.... it is called Purgatory...

 

 

He can't retire. There's no place that wants him... So he'll continue to haunt the Senate halls for all eternity apparantly...

[RubberBullets 65]

Is he implying that the military will also be dumbing down to 10rnd mags if they cannot be legally manufactured?

[ruger9 0]

Ok, but thats not whats happening. The tax consumers are not outnumbering the tax payers.

 

That doesn't answer how he gets reelected time after time.

 

In the state of NJ, the number of VOTING tax consumers DOES outnumber the VOTING tax payers. You might add low-information voters (the ones who always vote for the incumbent, or the ones who watch CNN), and there you have it.

[70gto 142]

How about a real coordinated effort to flood their offices with emails , letters calls etc, also to Chris Christie.

[SJG 253]

Menendez is just as bad, he co-sponsors all Lautenbergs bills and is also just as anti-gun

[Candide 0]

 

 

In the state of NJ, the number of VOTING tax consumers DOES outnumber the VOTING tax payers. You might add low-information voters (the ones who always vote for the incumbent, or the ones who watch CNN), and there you have it.

 

Incorrect. Show me the numbers of the people on welfare or want not vs the working/taxpaying people.

[ruger9 0]

Incorrect. Show me the numbers of the people on welfare or want not vs the working/taxpaying people.

 

It's not just about welfare. Social security. Obamacare. Unemployment. Disability. Medicare/Medicaid. People want stuff, and they don't want to pay for it. As Margaret Thatcher said, (I paraphrase) "socialism works great until you run out of other people's money."

 

There are more uninformed voters who think the "government pays" for all this stuff than there are those who actually pay for it. it's the only explanation. And if you think another explanation could be that people actually agree with Lautenberg's policies, please see previous sentences. Because it's the same people.

[jrfly3006 42]

Lautenbergs stock is falling faster than ENRON..nobody want to deal with the crypt-keeper anymore..hopefully this bill gies DOA just like him

[jm1827 284]

I still think it wouldn't hurt to keep sending him emails, letters and phone calls telling him that if he keeps sponsoring these bills that we will vote for someone else even Booker. Not that I voted for him in the first place but just to make a statement.

 

He keeps pushing the fact that he wants to leave on his own terms, and that Corey Booker can't just walk in and have his job. Let's just keep reminding him that if he continues pushing these bills that he won't have a choice and will be voted out.

[Candide 0]

 

 

It's not just about welfare. Social security. Obamacare. Unemployment. Disability. Medicare/Medicaid. People want stuff, and they don't want to pay for it. As Margaret Thatcher said, (I paraphrase) "socialism works great until you run out of other people's money."

 

There are more uninformed voters who think the "government pays" for all this stuff than there are those who actually pay for it. it's the only explanation. And if you think another explanation could be that people actually agree with Lautenberg's policies, please see previous sentences. Because it's the same people.

 

I agree with you on the uninformed voters but the tax payers still outnumber the recipients.

[remixer 1,645]

Now you know the reason my NRA card looks like this:

 

Not a joke, that is my NRA card

[ruger9 0]

I agree with you on the uninformed voters but the tax payers still outnumber the recipients.

 

Again- in case you didn't understand my whole point: voting tax consumers and low-information voters outnumber tax payers and high information voters. There's no other possible reason. And AGAIN- if dems outnumber repubs, it's for the exact same reasons I have already stated- these are all the same people.