Jump to content
peterk2000

S&W Revolvers worth the premium?

Recommended Posts

While I favor S&Ws, I have a few Ruger tanks in my collection as well. Personally, I would take a 617 over the SP101 in .22 every day. For the .357Mag, if you're buying new production is goes either way. If you were talking a 686 CS-1 vs a GP-100, the CS-1 would win every day. Now if the option was an older M27 vs the GP-100, it would be the M27.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they worth the premium? no

 

A Ruger or Taurus will do the job at hand.

 

Now, if your going into gun games and want a gun specifically built for that purpose then the Smiths are the way to go hands down.

 

But, if your only using said firearm for range, home defense, CCW in Amurica or collecting then pick any of the 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you are cost sensitive or going to shoot a lot of 22lr, I would just skip the 22lr in favor of a 357 to shoot 38specials.

Then you can think about getting a 625 for 45acp or 629/redhawk for 44specials.

 

S&W finish quality is top notch. Ruger is also nice.

Talo series are awesome.

I prefer long barrels. There's something nice about pointing a 6" barrel at a target vs. 3".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Smith and Wesson Model #19 that I bought back in '77 with some HS graduation money. That was more than 35 years ago now. It's still in service, loaded with Federal Hydro Shock .38 Spl. +P's as I type this. Several other additional revolvers since then. Is it worth the difference? In a word, YES!

 

Dave

Wheelgunner Extraordinaire (lol)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another vote for the smith.

 

I own, and have owned various ruger revolvers, while they are built like tanks, work very well.... I still prefer my smiths.

 

Triggers are better out of the box, tons more " aftermarket" parts as far as upgrades.

 

s&w will also hold it's resale value better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer smiths as the trigger are better. Just personal preference. Rugers are tanks and shoot great.

 

I did however feel the trigger on a Ruger 3" gp100 with a bobbed hammer. Had the best trigger on a Ruger I have eve felt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer smiths as the trigger are better. Just personal preference. Rugers are tanks and shoot great.

 

I did however feel the trigger on a Ruger 3" gp100 with a bobbed hammer. Had the best trigger on a Ruger I have eve felt.

 

With a little bit of money and elbow grease you can improve the trigger on both smiths, and rugers tremendously, but again - I feel smiths are easier to modify

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

43 Years shooting revolvers here. Mostly Colts and S&W with one Dan Wesson with interchangeable barrels for different lengths and one Taurus. As one poster said, my best .22lr is a S&W 617. My Ruger LCR .22lr locks up with any hot .22lr loads like CCI Mini Mags. However the Ruger LCR in .22 mag and .357 mag works just fine and has a better trigger out of the box than a regular S&W snub nose. Over the last few years I have owned a lot of S&W revolvers all the way from a 11 oz. .357 mag. to a .327 mag to a 7 shot 686 and the 617 as well as many others.

 

Just last year I decided to try a Ruger for the first time when they came out with the LCR .38 +P. At first it looked odd but it functioned perfectly, had better grips than any stock S&W and its cam operated trigger was better than any of my stock snub noses in my collection. Emboldened by that I then purchased a GP100 in .357. Built like a tank and the trigger was not bad at all. A little odd looking also but a very good gun. From there I saw a special edition Wiley Clapp GP100 with a 3" barrel, melt job, champhered chambers and a taped cylinder so that holstering is easier. Fiber optic front and Noval all black rear sights. $65 trigger job which was already worked on for this edition made the trigger the smoothest that I own. Then I started buying the SA guns and now I have 3 LCR's with the .22 mag being the newest.

 

So after so many revolvers over so many years I have come to the conclusion that it depends. It depends on the model and the use. Rugers are cheaper, built like tanks to last and in general handle the most powerful loads. For instance, my Ruger Alaskan .44 mag could handle hotter loads than the S&W 629. There are some very nice performance center S&W guns that I would like to own. However, in general, for home defense and range shooting you cannot go wrong with a Ruger. They are even simplier to take apart and do your own trigger job on as well as change springs. The pricing on S&W is getting ridiculous. I think I paid close to $800 for my 617 .22lr. That is a lot for a .22. You can get tha SA 10 shot Ruger gun for a few hundred less and it is a fine shooter.

 

If you have the money and like the looks of a S&W, then go for it as they are all fine guns. However if you plan on shooting hot loads, go with the Ruger. As, I said, it depends. Here is my Wiley Clapp gun:

 

GP100-Wiley-Clapp.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they are worth the "premium" price tag. I have a 686 and although I'm not really a wheelgunner per se, it is the funnest gun I own. I love shooting it even though I can't hit anything with it. The trigger is a good bit better than any of the Rugers out of the box that I played with.

 

Good luck in your choice.

 

C

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...