Jump to content
Purple Patrick

My first handgun! S&W 686+ content

Recommended Posts

Check and see if it has the quick release front sight.  If so, I really like the replacement fiber optics that are available.

 

From the picture I can see that it is a pinned front sight, not the DX interchangeable one. Not a biggie, as that also can be changed out to a FO - just a little more hassle. Some Smith front sight blades are integral with the base and cannot be changed unless you do a lot of machining.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice!

 

How does it fit in the holster?

Fits great. I was slightly worried because they didn't have an option for the plus model, it's the same size but the flutting is different but they said it should still fit. Slides in tight but smooth and retention is great. It disappeared under a sweatshirt despite the size

 

 

This signature exceeds the 15 character capacity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She resides bedside loaded with some .38 +p critical duty...

 

Any reservations about using a gun with an internal lock for home defense purposes? There are accounts of them spontaneously locking up on people.  Some say this is a myth, but I've heard enough stories and have seen enough videos/pictures of guns where the lock completely jammed up that I believe it.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any reservations about using a gun with an internal lock for home defense purposes? There are rare but confirmed accounts of them spontaneously locking up on people.

 

 

 

Nope not one bit

 

 

This signature exceeds the 15 character capacity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope not one bit

 

 

This signature exceeds the 15 character capacity

 

Well, that's good.  I love the 686 and am seriously considering getting one but these complaints are definitely something that concerns me.  I'm sure it's rare but the fact that it happens at all is bothersome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that's good. I love the 686 and am seriously getting one but these complaints are definitely something that concerns me. I'm sure it's rare but the fact that it happens at all is bothersome.

Since I just got it today and haven't shot it yet I can't personally attest to it's reliability but if I put a few hundred rounds thru it every couple weeks and it doesn't fail then I don't think it will on the cylinder I may possibly have to defend myself with. Seeing as many guns as they sell daily and the low number of failures i don't see it as an issue and don't expect mine to fail unless I neglect if

 

 

This signature exceeds the 15 character capacity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I took this bad girl home tonight, thanks again Steve! Here's some pics. She resides bedside loaded with some .38 +p critical duty. I will be shooting her tomorrow!a6asu7a4.jpg

 

 

This signature exceeds the 15 character capacity

 

Wow you took it right home and gun porned it LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that's good.  I love the 686 and am seriously considering getting one but these complaints are definitely something that concerns me.  I'm sure it's rare but the fact that it happens at all is bothersome.

 

The internal lock can be removed in a matter of minutes, Personally - I just remove the flag that would make contact with the hammer to lock it. But there are guys out there that remove the whole "key" section as well and plug the hole with a matching piece of metal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The internal lock can be removed in a matter of minutes, Personally - I just remove the flag that would make contact with the hammer to lock it. But there are guys out there that remove the whole "key" section as well and plug the hole with a matching piece of metal.

FWIW Massad Ayoob feels this is a bad idea...

 

"I did not remove the internal lock, for the simple reason that I’ve seen a prosecutor raise hell about a deactivated safety device when trying to establish the element of recklessness that is a key ingredient in a manslaughter conviction. “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the defendant was so reckless that he DEACTIVATED A SAFETY DEVICE ON A LETHAL WEAPON, and so arrogant that he thought he knew more about the gun than the factory that made it!” That’s a mountain I’d rather not have to climb in court, nor debate in front of twelve jurors selected in part by opposing counsel for their lack of knowledge of firearms."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW Massad Ayoob feels this is a bad idea...

 

"I did not remove the internal lock, for the simple reason that I’ve seen a prosecutor raise hell about a deactivated safety device when trying to establish the element of recklessness that is a key ingredient in a manslaughter conviction. “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the defendant was so reckless that he DEACTIVATED A SAFETY DEVICE ON A LETHAL WEAPON, and so arrogant that he thought he knew more about the gun than the factory that made it!” That’s a mountain I’d rather not have to climb in court, nor debate in front of twelve jurors selected in part by opposing counsel for their lack of knowledge of firearms."

 

 

At which point my lawyer would cue the countless youtube videos of the lock randomly engaging during use rending the firearm useless.

 

I'd rather have to have that argument, then have my firearm jam up when I need it most. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If that wasn't a "performance center" version (meaning its been altered from original) I might be worried. I'm sure it has happened to a couple factory 686's also. But what you don't see is thousands of videos of people shooting their s&w internal lock revolvers without issues. That would just be boring.

 

I have 3 s&w's, including the 686+, that all have the internal lock. I have shot a lot of rounds through all 3 and never had one lock up. I would say the odds are in my favor. I have a 642 airweight with the internal lock and would not hesitate to use it a primary carry piece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If that wasn't a "performance center" version (meaning its been altered from original) I might be worried. I'm sure it has happened to a couple factory 686's also. But what you don't see is thousands of videos of people shooting their s&w internal lock revolvers without issues. That would just be boring.

 

I have 3 s&w's, including the 686+, that all have the internal lock. I have shot a lot of rounds through all 3 and never had one lock up. I would say the odds are in my favor. I have a 642 airweight with the internal lock and would not hesitate to use it a primary carry piece.

 

I'll agree that the likelihood of it locking up is extremely small, but it's just that... small odds of it maybe happening, or maybe not.... Why not eliminate ALL chances of it ever happening by removing the lock.

 

All it does is go from " ehhh, I doubt it'll ever happen " to " Now i KNOW it wont happen "

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll agree that the likelihood of it locking up is extremely small, but it's just that... small odds of it maybe happening, or maybe not.... Why not eliminate ALL chances of it ever happening by removing the lock.

 

All it does is go from " ehhh, I doubt it'll ever happen " to " Now i KNOW it wont happen "

I have absolutely no doubts my revolvers would work. The thought doesn't even cross my mind. I have a beter chance of hitting the lottery. That reminds me, need to pick up some tickets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow you took it right home and gun porned it LOL

Your right the first thing I did was take it hind and take 20 pictures of it, it's very photogenic. 2nd thing was wear if iwb for the rest of the night and it was surprisingly comfortable

 

 

This signature exceeds the 15 character capacity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't even have to remove the "flag". For those that are into aesthetics, removing the flag leaves a space next to the hammer. All that has to be done is to remove the flag, file off the "D" shaped lug and then replace the flag. All external appearances remain the same. It is the lug on the flag that engages a recess in the hammer that locks the gun.

 

Most instances of failure occur in light, high-recoiling guns. I have no doubt that some 686's may have experienced it too, but that is more a matter of numbers - there are so many of them that the pool of potential malfunctions makes it more likely to happen. If expressed as a failure rate per 1000 guns, I would expect it to be very low.

 

Adios,

 

Pizza Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...