njpilot 671 Posted January 23, 2014 Hmm my town is still requiring an information waiver. Now how do I prove that my police chief received... certified mail with a return receipt? No...I'd say email, but I don't know how I'd prove the attachment's contents. I'm sure he will not comply. He's quite an obnoxious, pretentious, and condescending fellow. Offical misconduct would suit him well. Jeremy, thank you for your time, patience, money spent, and faith for this cause. Donation to help fight the good fight will be sent out. Hey Chris, what about talking to your mayor? Do you think he's the type that would tell the chief to follow the law? Maybe a threat to bring suit against the town for not complying with a judges order. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CMJeepster 2,777 Posted January 23, 2014 If I were in this situation, I'd request a face-to-face meeting with the CLEO. Go in with the correct attitude. (Be nice!!!! You catch more flies with honey than you do with shit...) Start off by saying something like, "I'd like to discuss the additional documents that you require..." If the CLEO gets defensive or insists that it's law or policy, maintain the nice attitude. Bring two hard copies (printouts) of the ruling for you two to discuss. If that's not enough, ask them who you should talk to next like the chief municipal administrator or the mayor. Don't be an ass and be prepared to walk away. Be courteous and make sure to thank them for their time!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Worn_Holster 2 Posted January 23, 2014 Has anyone else noticed that the opinion of the court is no longer located here? http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a0498-12.pdf Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CMJeepster 2,777 Posted January 23, 2014 I noticed that a few minutes ago when I was composing my last post. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Malsua 1,422 Posted January 23, 2014 Has anyone else noticed that the opinion of the court is no longer located here? http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/a0498-12.pdf It works fine for me but it's a different decision. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
siderman 1,137 Posted January 23, 2014 Hmmm, the case of the missing case? Lucky its still quoted in the first post. Or is it?http://www.scribd.com/doc/197319250/Jeremy-Perez-vs-Patterson-NJ-for-a-Firearms-Purchaser-Identification-Card Actually you can still view it via the Ammoland link above Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryan_j 0 Posted January 23, 2014 It's also on google cache. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
raz-0 1,259 Posted January 23, 2014 anyone got the .pdf? I'm not real keen on signing up for yet one more service simply to download it. On the up side, if someone wants to send me a copy, I'll put it up and post a link unencumbered by any signup requirement so folks cna print it out at whim. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JeremyP 0 Posted January 24, 2014 anyone got the .pdf? I'm not real keen on signing up for yet one more service simply to download it. On the up side, if someone wants to send me a copy, I'll put it up and post a link unencumbered by any signup requirement so folks cna print it out at whim. Attached. 197319250-Jeremy-Perez-vs-Patterson-NJ-for-a-Firearms-Purchaser-Identification-Card.pdf Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Worn_Holster 2 Posted January 26, 2014 Not suppose to be published without approval of the court, internet posting may be included in that restriction. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryan_j 0 Posted April 17, 2014 Update from the Nappen firm - Jeremy Perez received his FID. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryan_j 0 Posted April 17, 2014 Not suppose to be published without approval of the court, internet posting may be included in that restriction. That doesn't mean that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
msokad 3 Posted April 18, 2014 The wife and I took the first steps course at Gun for hire beginning of March. At the beginning of class we introduced ourselves. We were lucky enough to have Jeremy in out class. Thank you for taking a stand. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JeremyP 0 Posted April 19, 2014 Update from the Nappen firm - Jeremy Perez received his FID. Yup. You'd figure waiting 2 years for FID and permits I'd have an idea of what my first firearm would be, still have no idea. The wife and I took the first steps course at Gun for hire beginning of March. At the beginning of class we introduced ourselves. We were lucky enough to have Jeremy in our class. Thank you for taking a stand. You're welcome. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryan_j 0 Posted April 19, 2014 Yup. You'd figure waiting 2 years for FID and permits I'd have an idea of what my first firearm would be, still have no idea. You're welcome. Hey congrats man! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
siderman 1,137 Posted April 19, 2014 Yup. You'd figure waiting 2 years for FID and permits I'd have an idea of what my first firearm would be, still have no idea. You're welcome. Thats pretty funny, lol-thanks for hanging in there and making a stand. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quikz 34 Posted April 20, 2014 Each respective NJ town will just arbitraily keep, this grid of common sense regulatory matrix of sensible regulations in place still due to long standing public safety interests, so they can still overule judge. Ohhh......judge smudge. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sota 1,191 Posted April 20, 2014 Jeremy: I have a couple HKs and a Ruger SR22 you're welcome to come try. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reddog87 0 Posted April 21, 2014 Denied, they said there has to be justifiable need to hear the case. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
