Call Gov. Christie to VETO A2006/S993 @ 609-292-6000

[Tallday 10]

Call Gov. Christie to VETO A2006/S993 @ 609-292-6000

 

 

[boo 6]

I just called and they were far more polite and professional than I was expecting. But then again, I had low expecations

[JT Custom Guns 957]

I called - they again, were very polite!

Just wish I had his cell phone number................. lol

[Teky0101 6]

How much longer do we have for him to veto it?

[HBecwithFn7 296]

How much longer do we have for him to veto it?

 

07/07/2014

[jm1827 284]

I just called as well

[Shane45 807]

I called, as for others they were polite. There have been a ton of calls. Don't let up right to the last day!!!!!

[boo 6]

What suprised me is she asked to clarify my position as if she wanted to be sure she was recording it correctly. I was expecting more of a "kthxbai" type response by now.

[jtd771 18]

Called and polite as well.

[Theron 5]

Done. Polite lady.

[Newtonian 453]

Did somebody remove my post? 

[HBecwithFn7 296]

Well, CC was busy today, apparently. 

 

Chris Christie courts the Religious Right. at "Faith Freedom Summit."

 

I don't know, precisely what this means. It might mean he's still putting out feelers, but we'll see.

[67gtonut 847]

Did somebody remove my post? 

 

Yes.... I did....

 

Rude and uncalled for....

[chris327 30]

Ive been calling and never had an unpleasant experience they are always very polite on the phone.

[Newtonian 453]

Yes.... I did....

 

Rude and uncalled for....

It was neither rude nor uncalled for. It's called HUMOR. Nothing worse than you'd hear on the Tonight Show.

 

Too bad for people with no sense of humor.

 

Hey why don't you give me a second strike? Or did you?

[vladtepes 1,060]

07/07/2014

 

 

this has gone far closer to the wire than I expected.. 

[45Doll 5,877]

July 3 at 5:00 PM.

[HBecwithFn7 296]

this has gone far closer to the wire than I expected.. 

 

Well, either he's waiting until the legislature goes on vacation for the 4th of July to veto, or he's going to let it lapse and pass automatically. I would have thought that if he wanted to "sign into law," he'd have done it by now. I can't believe he hasn't made a decision yet... What, is he still waiting on the "best deal possible?" I also wonder if he's thinking that if he lets it "lapse into law" it won't have the same political effects as if he actively "signs into law..."

 

Not from my perspective....

[70gto 142]

For what its worth, letting it lapse into law is being just as culpable as signing it himself, no excuse for me at least.  I will call Monday and get at least 3 more to call.

[DSD1026 48]

this has gone far closer to the wire than I expected.. 

i disagree..  i expected nothing less.  He will not show his cards too early..  longer it goes on, the less people remember it.. news faded with time.  if he vetoed it right away, the Dems would have been all over it..  wait a while, let it fade, and while the pro 2A people are paying attention, everyone else is gone on to something else at this time.  then he vetoes it, and the pro 2A people applaud the veto, and it causes a minor stir with the anti;s (who expect him to veto it anyway)..

 

at least, thats how i see it..

[HBecwithFn7 296]

i disagree..  i expected nothing less.  He will not show his cards too early..  longer it goes on, the less people remember it.. news faded with time.  if he vetoed it right away, the Dems would have been all over it..  wait a while, let it fade, and while the pro 2A people are paying attention, everyone else is gone on to something else at this time.  then he vetoes it, and the pro 2A people applaud the veto, and it causes a minor stir with the anti;s (who expect him to veto it anyway)..

 

at least, thats how i see it..

 

Let us all truly hope that's how *he* sees it....

[Reddog87 0]

No one likes a man of inaction.

[DSD1026 48]

No one likes a man of inaction.

Christie is anything but a man of inaction.  Everything he does is calculated.  If he hasnt vetoed it yet, its been for a reason. 

[voyager9 3,434]

Christie is anything but a man of inaction. Everything he does is calculated. If he hasnt vetoed it yet, its been for a reason.

On the flip side: if he hasn't signed it yet it us for a reason.

 

My opinion is there is more to be gained from waiting and veto vs waiting and sign. If was truly for this, he could sign right away and take advantage of existing wave of media attention. Waiting to veto lets this wave subside before he acts.

[voyager9 3,434]

Anyone remember how long he waited to veto the bills last year? I thought he waited a while to veto the big one.

[jrfly3006 42]

Only the end result means anything...people dont care if he takes 3 or 30 days

[Wolfy 51]

Best bet is for out of state family and friends to contact the gov and let him know he will never make it through the primaries if he allows this to become law .

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Underdog 1,593]

If he vetos it, can he do it on the 4th?  OR will that be after the time limit?

[voyager9 3,434]

If he vetos it, can he do it on the 4th? OR will that be after the time limit?

It's before the limit, but I believe the state offices are closed.

[raz-0 1,259]

Well, either he's waiting until the legislature goes on vacation for the 4th of July to veto, or he's going to let it lapse and pass automatically. I would have thought that if he wanted to "sign into law," he'd have done it by now. I can't believe he hasn't made a decision yet... What, is he still waiting on the "best deal possible?" I also wonder if he's thinking that if he lets it "lapse into law" it won't have the same political effects as if he actively "signs into law..."

 

Not from my perspective....

It's budget time. Sitting on it keeps it from becoming a negotiating point with budget issues? Then you get to bury any feigned outrage from the Ds in the holiday weekend.

 

That's the theory anyway.