Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
njpilot

Great Statement by a Former Supreme Court Justice

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately, everyone including our justices don't give a wit about our Constitution or the Bill of Rights.

 

Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954): "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My dear late friends, the "framers" (or "patriots" as my wife used to call them, before the term became common, and they really did run a framing shop), used to say that the difference between a democracy and a republic was that in the latter your rights are not subject to vote. Whereas a democracy was "two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...