Jump to content
D. Stallone

Quick Question Before Starting My AR Build.

Recommended Posts

In the next week or two, I am going to have my dad order a lower for me. Only reason is because he can get the one I want for cheaper. My question is, or really making sure I follow the "rules", even though the lower will be under my dads name, do I still need to follow the rules to keep it Jersey legal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I am 25 and I do have my FID. I only asked because I will be building it at my dads and I wanted to know what I would need to do to it to make it jersey legal in case I wanted to bring it back here and shoot it at the range.

 

And yea, I probably should have added this to the first post.

 

Now that I think about it, if I`m building it there, and I want to bring it here, I should just look at the laws for the this state..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess your dad is out of state? Where?

 

Better question, what's preventing YOU from buying it from the place your dad will get it from? If the vendor is out of state, buy it with your money and have the vendor ship it to a NJ FFL and go through NICS with your info.

 

If not, your dad can buy the lower he wants to get for his build, you can help him build it if he's not familiar with the process including it making it compliant for someone in NJ to purchase. Then if he decides to sell it and you like the AR, maybe you can buy it following normal processes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the next week or two, I am going to have my dad order a lower for me. Only reason is because he can get the one I want for cheaper. My question is, or really making sure I follow the "rules", even though the lower will be under my dads name, do I still need to follow the rules to keep it Jersey legal?

 

What you're describing is a straw purchase.

 

Legal: Your dad buys a lower, does the BGC, and gifts it to you. 

Illegal: Your dad buys a lower, does the BGC, you pay him, he gives you the lower.

 

Federally speaking, anyway.  Not being a NJ FFL, I can't say I'm familiar enough to say there isn't anything at the state level that you'd be running afoul of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the next week or two, I am going to have my dad order a lower for me. Only reason is because he can get the one I want for cheaper. My question is, or really making sure I follow the "rules", even though the lower will be under my dads name, do I still need to follow the rules to keep it Jersey legal?

 

How much money are you actually saving? For a few dollars more, buy it yourself through a NJGF Vendor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Irrespective of the rifles origin, if you plan on bringing it to NJ, even as a non-resident, it must be compliant. Lowers aren't that expensive that the savings could be worth much never mind running afoul of federal gun laws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the next week or two, I am going to have my dad order a lower for me. Only reason is because he can get the one I want for cheaper. My question is, or really making sure I follow the "rules", even though the lower will be under my dads name, do I still need to follow the rules to keep it Jersey legal?

 

Don't do it, for all the reasons above. Lowers are cheap, buy it yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that to make it a straw purchase, he must be ineligible to purchase said lower.  He said he has an FID card, which makes him eligible to purchase the lower.  So, what makes this a straw purchase?

 

I hate to cite Wikipedia, however it was linked earlier.  Pulled straight from the link.

 

 

 

Straw purchases are legal except in cases where the ultimate receiver of goods or services uses those goods or services in the commission of a crime with the prior knowledge of the straw purchaser, or if (depending on recent rulings of the USSC) the ultimate possessor is not legally able to purchase the goods/services.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I very seriously doubt this has anything to do with terrorism.    1) Harbor pilots are VERY seriously vetted, and highly trained. Not to mention extremely well paid. My experience knowing a few of them, and knowing how they are recruited and screened tells me that there is a slim to highly unlikely chance that a harbor pilot would have participated in anything like that.    2) Maintenance of foreign flag ships is well known to be dubious. Especially these days. These were NOT US flag, Jones act sailors. It was (to my understanding) a largely Indian crew on that ship, with a Ukrainian Captain. Indian crews are not exactly known for being stellar.    3) The bunkers (fuel) these ships use is ‘Bunker C’, which is a heavy, dirty fuel oil that can, and usually is, pretty contaminated. This stuff ain’t your car grade gasoline or diesel fuel. It’s nasty.   It requires nearly constant filter changes and maintenance to the engine/generators. The ship took on fuel prior to departing port, which would stir up all kinds of shit in the fuel tanks, which would contribute to particulates in the fuel lines/filters.    4) I’d say the posting of the chief engineer for Maserek above was pretty spot on as far as chain of events.    This was a shitty accident, with horrible timing and outcome. Not a terror attack. 
    • I saw Lara's interview on Bannon's War Room, and that gave me pause for thought. Her conjecture depends primarily on the veracity of her sources. Regardless, if it's not applicable in any way to this ship disaster, the methods described seem valid to me. And worthy of consideration for the future. As I said before, IMO something is coming. Death by a thousand cuts? Lara Logan Provides Comprehensive Baltimore Update: Experts in Behavioral Analytics, Counter-Terrorism, and National Security Analyze Recent Incident | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
    • Another big windfall for governments'. The 'winner'? Not so much. Mega Millions $1.13 billion winner is facing mega tax bill. The amount is staggering. - nj.com
×
×
  • Create New...