Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Still 404'ing for me, in two different browsers.

 

Sorry - it looks like my post was a bit confusing.  What I meant in my post was that InFamous probably had the page cached and that was why he was actually able to see something other than 404.  With a refresh, he should (and did, apparently) get the same 404 the rest of us are getting since the server is down.  Intentional or unintentional?  We're not sure, but it's a bit fishy that it goes down right when he stops posting updates here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - it looks like my post was a bit confusing.  What I meant in my post was that InFamous probably had the page cached and that was why he was actually able to see something other than 404.  With a refresh, he should (and did, apparently) get the same 404 the rest of us are getting since the server is down.  Intentional or unintentional?  We're not sure, but it's a bit fishy that it goes down right when he stops posting updates here.

 

This is correct. I loaded it back up and all links were giving me the 404...as soon as I refreshed the main page it too gave me the 404 error.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible that the powers-that-be came up with a radical solution to the RICO lawsuit, and pulled a "pinochet'?

Personally, I wouldn't put it past them to create a new class of subjects here in the Glorious Peoples Republik of New Jerseystan - the DESAPARECIDOS

 

We have a winner.

Several legal websites list the case number as 3:2015cv03534 with the New Jersey District Court.

I have been unable to check the status of that case number online with the New Jersey District Court website.

Who will be next to disappear?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a winner.

Several legal websites list the case number as 3:2015cv03534 with the New Jersey District Court.

I have been unable to check the status of that case number online with the New Jersey District Court website.

Who will be next to disappear?

Wtf?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

only those vetted worthy of their efforts have been let in on their Dark Ops. Recent up-dates:

MONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2015- Tomorrow Nick will pull the trigger on the next step referenced below. We have prepared a Writ of Mandamus which will be filed in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. We will post that entire document, which spells out and details to the upper court the shenanigans, delays and possible collusion between the Defendants and the District Court in Trenton. Please note that at this time, the Writ does not accuse Judge Shipp of any complicity, nor wrong doing in those proceedings. However it's quite clear that if he was not aware of the goings on, they were happening right under his nose.

We will upload the Writ of Mandamus here, after the Third Circuit Court has been served. It will also be posted on the SAPPA document page. It is important to know that this Writ is not the anticipatedAppeal concerning Purpura v. Christie, which will occur when and if Judge Shipp rules in favor of a Dismissal, or if he rules that the Defendant are in default. (at which time the state will appeal) That appeal is mostly prepared and ready to go. This Writ is a new petition in that it requests that the upper court begin a serious investigation into the lower one.

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2015 - Having not received information from the District Court Chief Judge concerning our request for an investigation into the activities of the Trenton based court it was decided to take the next step we discussed earlier. On December 7, 2015 we prepared a letter to Judge Shipp informing him in a subtle, but definitive affirmation that his lack of rulings and communication with Nick was not acceptable nor will Mr. Purpura stand around and allow it to continue without taking steps to halt these protracted and no doubt, intentional delays. See that letter here: December 7, 2015 Letter to Shipp

 

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2015- Following the letter to Chief Judge Simandle several phone calls were made to his office inquiring as to the status of Nick's request for him to look into the proceedings of this case. Typical and not unexpected, no one there would make a commitment to any statement as to whether the Chief Judge had even seen the letter yet. We will continue to call them and will update any information we get, when we get it.

Where did you receive the updates?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

only those vetted worthy of their efforts have been let in on their Dark Ops. Recent up-dates:

 

MONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2015- Tomorrow Nick will pull the trigger on the next step referenced below.  We have prepared a Writ of Mandamus which will be filed in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.  We will post that entire document, which spells out and details to the upper court the shenanigans, delays and possible collusion between the Defendants and the District Court in Trenton.  Please note that at this time, the Writ does not accuse Judge Shipp of any complicity, nor wrong doing in those proceedings.  However it's quite clear that if he was not aware of the goings on, they were happening right under his nose.

 

We will upload the Writ of Mandamus here, after the Third Circuit Court has been served.  It will also be posted on the SAPPA document page.  It is important to know that this Writ is not the anticipatedAppeal concerning Purpura v. Christie,  which will occur when and if Judge Shipp rules in favor of a Dismissal, or if he rules that the Defendant are in default. (at which time the state will appeal) That appeal is mostly prepared and ready to go.  This Writ is a new petition in that it requests that the upper court begin a serious investigation into the lower one.

 

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2015 - Having not received information from the District Court Chief Judge concerning our request for an investigation into the activities of the Trenton based court it was decided to take the next step we discussed earlier.  On December 7, 2015 we prepared a letter to Judge Shipp informing him in a subtle, but definitive affirmation that his lack of rulings and  communication with Nick was not acceptable nor will Mr. Purpura stand around and allow it to continue without taking steps to halt these protracted and no doubt, intentional delays.  See that letter here:  December 7, 2015 Letter to Shipp

 

 

TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2015- Following the letter to Chief Judge Simandle several phone calls were made to his office inquiring as to the status of Nick's request for him to look into the proceedings of this case.  Typical and not unexpected, no one there would make a commitment to any statement as to whether the Chief Judge had even seen the letter yet.  We will continue to call them and will update any information we get, when we get it.

The link enclosed in this post worked for me.  I was able to read the letter to Shipp just fine.  I must say...  I like it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is just server/internet issues.  I know Dwight personally and I have spoken to Nick on the phone and have taken some time to research him and his past.  Neither one of them seem to be the type of guy that would just quit on this.  No way!  I say just be patient and they will get their server or internet issues worked out and everyone will be able to see what is going on once again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible they are having internet issues?

 

The link to the letter is hosted someplace else. The problem everyone is complaining about is with the tpath site. 

 

Despite the sinister musings, it could be something as simple as they went to update the site and broke it. Or that their host gave them warnings about needing ot update something for security, they didn't, and they got their site yanked until they do so. Or that the host did a hardware move and everything was supposed to work fin e but didn't. 

 

Most sinister thing that is actually likely is they had a crap host who folds like oragmi for anything DMCA related and someone from the state's side of things made a DMCA claim against posted content as being property of the court or something and reproduced without permission. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is just server/internet issues. I know Dwight personally and I have spoken to Nick on the phone and have taken some time to research him and his past. Neither one of them seem to be the type of guy that would just quit on this. No way! I say just be patient and they will get their server or internet issues worked out and everyone will be able to see what is going on once again.

Thank you for the info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats the big deal here? they said the site got hacked and its not the first time- it happens. Why does anything get hacked and by whom?.... So, the hacking took place and your guess is as good as theirs (altho working on it) or you think they arent telling the truth...Your choice.This group has put a lot time/effort into their agenda and are knee deep inthe legal process even tho it seems very one sided so far. i may not agree with everything they are doing but its a lot more than any other group is doing at least publicly and certainly intriguing. So some of you go ahead and belittle a worthy effort but I will be watching the progress of this lawsuit on our behalf. Below is the PM response relevent to the site being down from Dwight. I'm sure he wont mind-

 

Hi Guys,
It looks like we are on someone's radar.
They are continually hacking my website.

I have been in contact with GoDaddy and they say they don't know where the hack is coming from.

But they have helped in that when I notice it's down and call them, they get it back up.

They said they are going to monitor my ip address and see if they can catch whoever is doing this.

I was out putting in some new lighting for my daughter today. When I got to my emails I saw they were at it again.

I believe it is back up now. Let me know at [email protected] if you can't get on

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Siderman, could not agree with you more.  Many bitch about our plight in NJ (me included), but these guys are actually doing something that

is well-planned out and persistent.  I have met both Nick and Dwight, and I will tell you that they are solid guys who are passionate about this cause.

Thanks for the update from Dwight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats the big deal here? they said the site got hacked and its not the first time- it happens. Why does anything get hacked and by whom?.... So, the hacking took place and your guess is as good as theirs (altho working on it) or you think they arent telling the truth...Your choice.This group has put a lot time/effort into their agenda and are knee deep inthe legal process even tho it seems very one sided so far. i may not agree with everything they are doing but its a lot more than any other group is doing at least publicly and certainly intriguing. So some of you go ahead and belittle a worthy effort but I will be watching the progress of this lawsuit on our behalf. Below is the PM response relevent to the site being down from Dwight. I'm sure he wont mind-

 

Hi Guys,

It looks like we are on someone's radar.

They are continually hacking my website.

 

I have been in contact with GoDaddy and they say they don't know where the hack is coming from.

 

But they have helped in that when I notice it's down and call them, they get it back up.

 

They said they are going to monitor my ip address and see if they can catch whoever is doing this.

 

I was out putting in some new lighting for my daughter today. When I got to my emails I saw they were at it again.

 

I believe it is back up now. Let me know at [email protected] if you can't get on

I's still getting a 404 here

 

http://www.tpath.org/sappa-news-and-reports.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By 124gr9mm
      Received this last night.
      Sent a message to all the contact names on the list they provided at the link:
       
       HONEST GUN OWNERS TREATED
      THE SAME AS MURDERERS FOR
      INADVERTENT, TECHNICAL LAW VIOLATIONS   No Violent Crime Required Rot in Jail for Years While Awaiting “Trial”
      Tell Lawmakers to Fix or Oppose This Poorly-Crafted Bill
      On Monday, March 14 at 1:00 p.m., the New Jersey Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee is scheduled to consider A2426 – an apparently well-intentioned but badly botched piece of legislation whose intended purpose appears to be to throw the book at violent gun criminals – which law-abiding gun owners actually support.
        But as written, the bill does not distinguish between violent criminal behavior and innocent technical infractions for the draconian presumption against bail to apply.  Law-abiding gun owners who inadvertently violate NJ’s thicket of hyper-technical firearms possession laws would be treated exactly the same as murderers—thrown in jail to rot for years without bail while they await trial someday for their “crimes.”
      This is not an imagined concern, as the Garden State has a well-documented track record of throwing the book at honest gun owners for innocent technical infractions.  As written, this bill adds insult to injury and would throw honest gun owners in the gulag for years while they await trial for “infractions” like:
      -Stopping for food, fuel, going to the bathroom, or medical treatment on the way to or from the target range.
      -Transporting firearms to or from one’s place of business, a gun store, hunting, fishing, target shooting competitions, target ranges, re-enactments, gun buyback events, vacation homes or other destinations.
      -Widows or widowers turning in firearms of their deceased spouses.
      -Possession of antique and black powder firearms (even these firearms could trigger the draconian penalties under this bill).
      PLEASE IMMEDIATELY CLICK HERE TO EMAIL EVERY ASSEMBLY MEMBER AND TELL THEM TO EITHER FIX OR OPPOSE A2426.  The law should distinguish between MERE POSSESSION of firearms by honest gun owners, vs. MISUSE of firearms by violent gun criminals, and draconian penalties like presumptive denial of bail should only apply to violent criminals who misuse firearms, and not to innocent mistakes of honest gun owners like technical possessory infractions where no violent misconduct is present.  Honest gun owners should not be treated the same as murderers!  Throw the book at the bad guys but take extreme care not to lump the good guys in with the bad.  The bill can easily be amended to make it clear that its penalties apply only to persons accused of violent criminal behavior.
       
       
    • By NJGF
      Judge Kavanaugh and the Second Amendment
      http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/07/judge-kavanaugh-and-the-second-amendment/
      "....Kennedy sided with his more conservative colleagues in finding a Second Amendment right to have a handgun in the home, and there is no reason to believe that Judge Brett Kavanaugh, if confirmed, is likely to disagree"
      "....We know from his recorded dissents from the denial of review that Thomas would vote to review and overturn some existing gun laws, and we know that Gorsuch – at least to some extent – agrees with him. But it takes four votes to grant review in a case, and we do not know whether Roberts and Alito also agree with Thomas but have opted not to say so publicly, or whether they instead are content to leave the court’s gun-rights jurisprudence as it is."
      ".... just this week, the 9th Circuit struck down Hawaii’s ban on carrying weapons openly outside of the home; even if the case goes to the full 9th Circuit, the losing party is almost certain to ask the Supreme Court to weigh in."
    • By NJGF
      Second Amendment challenge to New York state stun gun ban
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/12/07/second-amendment-challenge-to-new-york-state-stun-gun-ban/?utm_term=.8affecbeea72&wpisrc=nl_volokh&wpmm=1
       
      A law suit was filed that challenges New York's stun gun ban based on second amendment issues.
       
      The filing is here:
      http://14544-presscdn-0-64.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/New-York-sued-in-federal-court-over-Taser-ban.pdf
       
      The suit cites Heller, McDonald, and the more recent Caetano v. Massachusetts decision.
       
      If NY falls then maybe NJ will be next.
       
    • By NJGF
      Don Kates, the father of the modern Second Amendment revival, has died
       
      https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/11/04/don-kates-the-father-of-the-modern-second-amendment-revival-has-died/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_term=.c54f683896c7
       
      Don wrote “Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment,” 82 Mich. L. Rev. 204 (1983), the first modern article in a major law review arguing for the individual-rights view of the Second Amendment.
       
    • By JibbaJabba
      http://www.gunssavelife.com/?p=11186
       
       
      Gun confiscation is one step closer in Connecticut. The mainstream media spins it as “one more chance” for non-compliant gun owners who failed to register their scary guns before the January 1 deadline.
       
      In reality, these letters - 106 to rifle owners, and 108 more to residents with standard capacity magazines – are the first step in the Connecticut State Police beginning to round up guns arbitrarily made illegal last year in that state. These guns include America’s favorite rifle, the AR-15 and magazines over 10 rounds, which include the standard capacity magazines made for that America’s favorite rifle.
       
      Failure to register is now a felony now in Connecticut.
       
      How long will it be before there is bloodshed over this law? We’re not sure, but we’re confident it is coming unless the law is rescinded or struck down by the courts.
       
      Mike Vanderboegh of the edgy Sipsey Street Irregulars released an open letter a couple of weeks ago, warning of what’s coming to Connecticut. The Connecticut State Police aren’t listening. Yet.
       
      We suspect attitudes may change after the first few rounds of bloodshed.
       
      As it stands right now, the best estimates are that 4% of newly-regulated guns and magazines in The Nutmeg State have been registered, leaving a hundred thousand or more newly classified potential felons looking over their shoulder.
       
      Editor’s note: We’re not going to link to the article because they are hiding most of the content behind a paywall and we won’t drive thousands of readers to their website.
       
      One more chance for gun owners
       
      Posted: Monday, February 24, 2014 3:35 pm | Updated: 3:36 pm, Mon Feb 24, 2014.
       
      Manchester, CT (Journal Inquirer) – When state officials decided to accept some gun registrations and magazine declarations that arrived after a Jan. 4 deadline, they also had to deal with those applications that didn’t make the cut.
       
      The state now holds signed and notarized letters saying those late applicants own rifles and magazines illegally.
       
      But rather than turn that information over to prosecutors, state officials are giving the gun owners a chance to get rid of the weapons and magazines.
       
      This entry was posted on February 24, 2014 at 5:55 pm and is filed under Blog. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
       
      -------------------------------
      100 letters don't seem like much, but it might be their strategy to tackle a little at a time when it comes to the overall 100k non-compliant gun owners. I'm giving strong consideration to the idea of making future purchases outside state lines.
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...