Jump to content
brucin

NJ man facing charges

Recommended Posts

This guy made the wrong choice. He should have contacted UPS and had them return to pick up the package.

 

http://nj1015.com/ups-screwup-delivers-lots-of-guns-to-nj-mans-house-now-hes-facing-charges/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess he thought that the "Finders Keepers" rule applied.

 

Sent from an undisclosed location.

Not in the PRNJ it doesn't!!! Even if he had called the police after receiving the package he probably would still have been charged with something!!! Hey! This is Jersey!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read this page the guy may have a defense if he hires a really good lawyer.

 

http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0181-unordered-merchandise

 

NJ law says otherwise though. Perhaps he'll get lucky and successfully argue that he didn't "know" the owner, but most likely the package (if he opened it) had paperwork that said who the owner and/or intended recipient was.

 

 

NJSA 2C:20-6 Theft of property lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake:

 

A person who comes into control of property of another that he knows to have been lost, mislaid, or delivered under a mistake as to the nature or amount of the property or the identity of the recipient is guilty of theft if, knowing the identity of the owner and with purpose to deprive said owner thereof, he converts the property to his own use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read this page the guy may have a defense if he hires a really good lawyer.

 

http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0181-unordered-merchandise

 

Not only does the post above show that in NJ that might not apply, but also there is the issue of coming into the possession of firearms by non-legal means. This isn't just an NJ thing, it is a federal thing as well, as it involves cross state line acquisition of handguns which must involve FFL's in your home state.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he got the package by mistake, threw it in his garage UNOPENED, made NO social media posts or phone calls announcing it or advertising guns for sale/loan/etc., and then went on a business trip or a planned vacation and planned on dealing with it AFTER he returned home, that's one thing.  He then has "proof" of no intent to commit a crime.  As soon as he opens the box, discovers a Bill of Lading and/or an invoice, he's bound to notify the shipper or intended recipient.  Finders / Keepers doesn't apply, lol!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bought a house as is (stupid, I know). While cleaning the house, found a "rifle", 22 I guess. Could have been a BB. This was way before I knew anything about firearms. Called PD, they came, picked it up. And I am still here.

 

In short, if the guy called PD or NJSP or a lawyer, he wouldn't be sitting on bail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not only does the post above show that in NJ that might not apply, but also there is the issue of coming into the possession of firearms by non-legal means. This isn't just an NJ thing, it is a federal thing as well, as it involves cross state line acquisition of handguns which must involve FFL's in your home state.

 

I'm not saying the guy is right. He should have called UPS to come and pick up the package as soon as he figured out what he received was not for him. With an expensive attorney he could play the "stupid card" I saw it on a government website to get his charges reduced.

 

Depending on what he tried to do with the contents the gun possession charges will probably be dropped as they are for almost all criminals and the theft charge reduced to possession of stolen property.

 

Provided he can pay several grand for a competent attorney. A public defender is not getting him out of this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's my understanding all firearm shipments require signature. If this guy signed for it I can't imagine how he thought he'd get away with it.

 

Well. the things were repackaged, who knows if the original signature requirement was still there. Also sometimes they just drop off packages without signatures, including guns. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the wrong label was put on the box, there would be no signature, unless his original package had it also.

Alright. Let's assume the re-labeling was a total screw-up, and that no signature required. The package is dropped off.

 

Then, someone with a devious intention should have spirited the entire package off to an undisclosed location. And when other parties came calling said "What package? Those front porch thieves must have made off with it."

 

Still dumb. And of course, illegal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright. Let's assume the re-labeling was a total screw-up, and that no signature required. The package is dropped off.

 

Then, someone with a devious intention should have spirited the entire package off to an undisclosed location. And when other parties came calling said "What package? Those front porch thieves must have made off with it."

 

Still dumb. And of course, illegal.

The problem is the cops recovered the guns. If they couldn't recover them and he played stupid he may have gotten away with it. I'm sure there was a search warrant. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorry, both are SPF.  Being picked up this week. Win M22  22 LR SPF to Ringwoodfrank.
    • Yup I see. Looks like right now you can only purchase the 2023-2024 permit still. I assume won't be able to purchase 24-25 season permit until July.
    • Just a heads-up for anyone who might also be in this situation. I joined USLS mid-April of 2022. Some time after renewing for 2023, I changed email providers, and dutifully reflected my new address on my account page. So, I have been anticipating renewal alerts at my new address, but those never arrived. I logged in to my account the other day, and was surprised to see that my subscription expired that same day. I went to my account main information page, confimed that my email address was correct, then went to the billing page, which showed my previous two payments, but which did not give me any apparent way to pay up for the new year. I requested support using the Customer Service form on the web site, but received no reply. Today I called their support number. Apparently changing the email address from my view of my account page did nothing to change the address that they use internally for billing purposes, including expiration notifications. Maybe they also use that address for replies to the support form, even if a different email address is entered there. Also, my account was set up to auto-renew and charge my credit card without my intervention, but that setting did not show on my account page in any obvious way. So, if you have USLS and have changed your email address since you last renewed, you might want to give them a call to ensure that they send renewal information to your correct address. The prospect of having legal coverage lapse while carrying in NJ was, for me, a less that confidence inspiring experience. I will note that the telephone-based customer service was excellent.
    • F*n imbeciles. They know damned well (or should) that, even if passed by the Colorado Senate and signed into law, virtually that entire load of crap is certain to fail Bruen/Heller scrutiny, and probably sooner, rather than later (SCOTUS). What a monumental waste of time (of course, how much can a dip$h*t's time be worth, anyway?) and energy. I passed through Colorado a few times in the 70s, and visited some clients there in the 80's & 90's, and, even by the end of that period, I had the impression that it was politically fairly conservative (with a few exceptions such as Aspen). WTF happened?
×
×
  • Create New...